Vatican City, Mar 24, 2018 / 09:11 am (CNA/EWTN News).- At the end of a week-long meeting held at the Vatican, young people from around the world have urged the Church to be more authentic, modern and creative not only in the way it interacts with young people, but also in addressing current hot-button issues.
“We want to say, especially to the hierarchy of the Church, that they should be a transparent, welcoming, honest, inviting, communicative, accessible, joyful and interactive community,” the youth said in the final document for this week’s pre-synod meeting in Rome.
“A credible Church,” they said, “is one which is not afraid to allow itself be seen as vulnerable.”
At the start of the meeting, several youth voiced the need for more role models, and said they wanted to be engaged in discussion on hot-button topics such as sexuality and the role of women. These concerns were also reflected in the document.
In general, youth were divided on the issues of sexuality, such as abortion, homosexuality and cohabitation. They also deadlocked on the topic of and migration and the male priesthood, failing to reach a consensus on any of these issues.
However, they were united in their desire for more role models, both inside and outside of the Church, and voiced a unanimous desire for a Church that is more credible and transparent, particularly on the issues of financial accountability and sex abuse.
They also voiced their desire to create more space for women in the Church and in society, and asked the Church to specify what the role of women is and how women can be promoted.
The document, released March 24, is the product of a week-long discussion with some 300 young people from different cultural and religious backgrounds, who gathered in Rome for a March 19-24 pre-synod meeting, which is a precursor to the October synod of bishops on “Young People, the Faith and the Discernment of Vocation.”
Youth were divided into 20 different languages groups, in which they reflected on a several questions throughout the week. Those who weren’t able to attend the meeting took part via social media, specifically through six different Facebook groups in different languages, which were moderated by other youth and discussed the same topics addressed in the Rome gathering.
Between the Rome gathering and social media participation, some 15,300 young people took part in the discussion. Drafting groups were tasked with taking the conclusions of the 26 different groups and compiling them into one comprehensive text.
An initial draft was written and presented to the group Thursday, and several of the youth participants made comments. Adjustments were made and the final draft was approved Saturday morning. It will be given to Pope Francis during his March 24 Palm Sunday Mass, which also marks the diocesan celebration of World Youth Day.
The 16-page document is divided into three sections: the challenges and opportunities of young people; faith, vocation, discernment and accompaniment and the Church’s formative and pastoral activities.
According to the document’s introduction, it’s not intended to be “a theological treatise” and nor was it written “to establish new Church teaching.” Rather, it’s meant to serve as “a compass” for bishops in their October discussion as they seek to understand the reality of youth today.
Throughout the text youth said they wanted to be listened to and taken seriously, and noted that they often seek communities that are supportive and which “empower them,” giving them a sense of identity and belonging.
Regarding the Church in particular, the youth noted that for some religion is now “a private matter,” and said that at times, it seems that “the sacred appears to be something separated from our daily lives.”
“The Church oftentimes appears as too severe and is often associated with excessive moralism,” they said, adding that “sometimes, in the Church, it is hard to overcome the logic of ‘it has always been done this way.’”
Rather, youth said “we need a Church that is welcoming and merciful, which appreciates its roots and patrimony and which loves everyone, even those who are not following the perceived standards.”
Young people, they wrote, “are deeply vested in and concerned about topics such as sexuality, addiction, failed marriages, broken families as well as larger-scale social issues such as organized crime, human trafficking, violence, corruption, exploitation, femicide, all forms of persecution and the degradation of our natural environment.”
However, one paragraph mentioned that there was clear divergence on certain “controversial” Church teachings dealing with issues such as contraception, abortion, homosexuality, cohabitation, the permanency of marriage, and the male priesthood.
The paragraph noted that many don’t understand Church teaching on these issues, and that of those who do, not all of them are in agreement. Young people “may want the Church to change her teaching as a result, or at least have access to a better explanation,” they said, but “even so, they desire to be part of the Church.”
Youth also disagreed on the topic of migration, but converged on the need to promote social justice, saying “although we acknowledge our common call to care for the dignity of every human person, there’s no consensus on the question of welcoming migrants and refugees.”
They also pointed to specific challenges such as globalization, an increase in secularism, racism, the difficulties faced by people in countries where Christianity is a minority, and the increasing number of Christian martyrs.
“As we grapple with these challenges,” they said, “we need inclusion, welcome, mercy and tenderness from the Church – both as an institution and as a community of faith.”
On new technologies, they outlined both the benefits and the risks, noting that while there are endless possibilities for increased connection, education and knowledge, there is also the danger that technology leads to “isolation, laziness, desolation and boredom.”
They also pointed to poor uses of technology such as online pornography, which “distort a young person’s perception of human sexuality” and creates a “delusional parallel reality that ignores human dignity.”
In this regard, the document at one point makes two key suggestions, first encouraging the Church to view technology, particularly the internet, as a “fertile place for the new evangelization.” Reflections on this point, they said, “should be formalized through an official Church document.”
Secondly, they requested that the Church “address the widespread crisis of pornography, including online child abuse, and the toll it takes on our humanity.”
On the role of women, the youth said women are still not given equal spaces neither in the Church, nor in society, and questioned how and where women can “flourish” in these environments. They said the role of women often isn’t clear, and asked the Church to specify what this role entails.
The document stressed that youth want to be taken seriously, and that despite often being accused of not having a vision for life, young people do envision a better future for themselves.
“Sometimes, we end up discarding our dreams,” the said, adding that “we are too afraid, and some of us have stopped dreaming. At times, we have not even had the opportunities to keep dreaming.”
Young people, the document read, “value the diversity of ideas in our global world, the respect for others’ thoughts and freedom of expression.” At the same time, youth want to preserve their cultural identity and “avoid uniformity and a throw-away culture.”
They said that many youth frequently feel “excluded for being Christians in a social environment that is adverse to religion,” and highlighted the need to “encounter ourselves and others” in order to form deep bonds.
False images of Jesus – that he is out-of-date, distant or rigid – often make young people unattracted to him, making Christian ideals seem “out of reach to the average person,” they said. “Therefore, for some, Christianity is perceived as an unreachable standard.”
Others, however, “accept these teachings and find in them a source of joy. They desire the Church to not only hold fast to them amid unpopularity but to also proclaim them with greater depth of teaching.”
Scandals within the Church damage the confidence young people have in it, the document said, but stressed that the Church can still play a “vital role” in ensuring that youth are accepted, and no longer marginalized.
In terms of vocation, youth said the concept is still “abstract” to many, and therefore doesn’t cross their minds.
“Young people understand the general sense of bringing meaning to life and being alive for a purpose, but many do not know how to connect that to vocation as a gift and call from God,” they said, and voiced their desire for mentors who are able to accompany them with wisdom and without judgment.
Oftentimes vocation is limited to just a functional role, they noted, saying they want the Church to be “a solid reference point” capable of helping them find their vocation “not only in a religious sense, but a broader sense.”
Youth also voiced their desire for more authenticity, transparency and openness in the Church’s life and structures, saying at one point that “a credible Church is one which is not afraid to allow itself be seen as vulnerable.”
“We want to say, especially to the hierarchy of the Church, that they should be a transparent, welcoming, honest, inviting, communicative, accessible, joyful and interactive community,” they said, adding that the Church should also be “sincere in admitting its past and present wrongs, that it is a Church made up of persons who are capable of error and misunderstanding.”
The document encouraged the Church to be firm in condemning scandals such as sex abuse and the “mismanagement” of power and wealth. If the Church does this with humility, they said, it will “undoubtedly raise its credibility among the world’s youth people.”
Youth also voiced their desire for a Church that is capable of spreading its message through modern means of communication and which is also able to answer young peoples’ questions in a way that isn’t “watered-down” or “per-fabricated.”
Rather, “we the young Church, ask that our leaders speak in practical terms about controversial subjects such as homosexuality and gender issues, about which young people are already freely discussing without taboo.”
The document underlined the desire for youth to become leaders in their communities, and asked young leaderships programs offering continual formation and development be established. Specific mention was made of a lack of young female role models in the Church, who also with to contribute with “their intellectual and professional gifts.”
Youth said they want to be “met where they are,” stressed the need for the Church to find “new and creative” ways of encountering people outside of the usual setting, such as in bars, coffee shops, gyms, stadiums or cultural centers.
They asked the Church to engage with “the right instruments,” which the document listed in bullet-point format as having a multimedia approach; service in movements or charities; beauty and the arts; adoration and contemplation; testimonies and the synod process itself.
However, going beyond practical, functional and institutional decision-making roles, youth said that ultimately, they wanted to be “a joyful, enthusiastic and missionary presence within the Church.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
I am fed to the teeth with the view that somehow “youth” is just so wise that we really should be listening to them about anything.
“several youth voiced the need for more role models.” Fine, give them a copy of Butler’s Lives of the Saints. And a book about, for example, Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati.
“In general, youth were divided on the issues of sexuality, such as abortion, homosexuality and cohabitation. They also deadlocked on the topic of and migration and the male priesthood, failing to reach a consensus on any of these issues.”
In other words, “In general, youth weren’t sure whether or not they should accept what the Church teaches.” And the whole priestesses thing has already been settled.
“They also voiced their desire to create more space for women in the Church and in society, and asked the Church to specify what the role of women is and how women can be promoted.”
There is already more than enough “space for women” in the Church, to the point that men are being crowded out. And if by “promoted” they mean “moved into positions of power,” since when is power the goal of Christianity?
“The Church oftentimes appears as too severe and is often associated with excessive moralism.” In translation: “We want to do whatever we want without anybody telling us it’s wrong.”
“We want to say, especially to the hierarchy of the Church, that they should be a transparent, welcoming, honest, inviting, communicative, accessible, joyful and interactive community.” Oh, barf. Anybody using all those annoying, trendy buzzwords should be ignored.
What a bag of garbage. Yes, I’m being testy, and with good reason.
The perfect NGO. What did they expect them to say? They’re products of the problem.
I agree that the negative points presented are clearly non catholic but also clearly a product of our culture…OUR CULTURE! How many Catholic adults today are Pro Contraception for example? How many voted for the pro-abortion candidate in the last presidential election?…almost 50%.
Culture change begins with the youth and our youth need those in our churches to lead them through example. My friends…in the West that example is severely lacking. Step up all. We must live and fight through this and listening to the youth is part of that fight. Would it be better if we simply sent them away?
The 60s cult of the youth needs to end; the youth are there to be formed and should be treated as adults. But do we have initiations for men? No. And the sacrament of confirmation should not be used as such.
At best they can reveal the failings of bishops and priests, and this document probably is clear as to what they are, even though many of these were unknown to the youth. One example: the triumph of feminism in the mindset of Catholic youth.
“On the role of women, the youth said women are still not given equal spaces neither in the Church, nor in society, and questioned how and where women can “flourish” in these environments. They said the role of women often isn’t clear, and asked the Church to specify what this role entails.”
Instead of a document or a synod, what the bishops should have done is re-examine their role as pastors of the local Church, spent time with their flocks and had a talk with them in openness and honesty. (I heard that Roman Catholics of Boston were given an opportunity to talk to the cardinal archbishop for 1 minute!?!) Maybe then they would be inspired by the Holy Spirit to understand that these days they act more as bureaucrats than as teachers and leaders, or rose, what they teach and lead is some form of the heresy of liberalism.
I should say the youth should be treated as adults-in-training
Nothing that could not have been predicted. Without a good Catechism in a strong faith-filled family, the disaffected youth want the Church to follow the culture…preferably as an app on their cell.
Cardinal Arinze once characterized bustling modernity as “organized noise.” And faced with such an amnesiac world, nearly a century ago G.K. Chesterton already concluded that it is the Church that is truly young: “We might sometimes fancy that the Church grows younger as the world grows old” (The Everlasting Man).
Did anyone else notice that the opinions given by the youth are extraordinarily similar to those expressed by Pope Francis in the past. It’s almost as if the Pope wrote the document himself.
…and that whole thing was a media event to promote the agenda.
“Youth”. Exactly what age bracket constitutes youth, and what specific age bracket was at this pre synod?
A big question: Why were non-Catholic “youth” included?
Who are these ‘young people’? Delegated by whom? The local modernist bishop? Besides not looking very young, to me, they appear by body language to be all too cozy, too familiar with the man in white, the Supreme Pontiff, the successor of St Peter.
No need to wonder why the youth theme is so often exploited by political opportunists and charlatans with miracle snake oil to purvey? Truly, there’s a sucker born every minute.
All rather pathetic, anti-intellectual and ultimately poisonous to the system whether it be religious, cultural or social.
A desire for mentors who are able to accompany them with wisdom and without judgment…
Viewing technology, particularly the internet, as a fertile place for the new evangelization. Reflections on this point, they said, should be formalized through an official Church document…
Youth said they want to be met where they are, stressed the need for the Church to find new and creative ways of encountering people outside of the usual setting, such as in bars, coffee shops, gyms, stadiums or cultural centers.
This article almost reads like something from The Babylon Bee. I’d like to say I simply can’t take a Synod on Youth seriously… but of corse I know Rome will, so I brace myself.
As a former youth, and wiser adult, I regret the attitudes I had then and would cringe if someone tried to give them any weight.
Because of course the most important thing to know is how the youth of the world feel about gay marriage and women priests (as if you really need a million dollar project to know). By all means church teaching and practice should be determined by the worst catechized generation ever in the history of the church.
I want…
I want…
I want….and I want it now.
Anything unclear, Holy Father?
More gibberish from the Tide pod eating generation. And, of course, they said exactly from Francis and his minions want to hear.
This papacy is: laugh- a -bull.