Round-up: Bishops respond to Notre Dame's invitation to Obama Print E-mail

Web Exclusive - UPDATED 

By Catherine Harmon

Since the University of Notre Dame announced on March 20 that President Barack Obama would be the speaker at their 2009 commencement and would receive an honorary degree from the university, Catholic communities across the country—as well as many of their bishops—have voiced their opposition, citing the president’s virulently pro-abortion views and actions. An online petition to Notre Dame president Father John Jenkins, C.S.C. was quickly drafted and touted across the Internet on Catholic blogs and websites; two weeks after the university’s announcement that Obama would speak, the petition decrying that decision had been signed by more than 230,000 individuals.

In addition to those signing the petition—which was initiated by the Cardinal Newman Society and is hosted on a website set up specifically to protest the Obama invitation—many US bishops have also criticized the university’s decision. Most of these critiques, while made available to the public, have been addressed directly to Father Jenkins, and many take issue with the university president’s assertion that Obama’s appearance at Notre Dame would be “the basis of an engagement” with Obama on issues such as abortion and embryonic stem-cell research.

Bishop John D’Arcy of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana—the diocese in which Notre Dame is located—on March 24 issued a statement expressing his disappointment in the university’s decision and announcing his decision not to attend the commencement ceremonies. “I wish no disrespect to our president, I pray for him and wish him well,” D’Arcy said in his statement. “But a bishop must teach the Catholic faith ‘in season and out of season,’ and he teaches not only by his words—but by his actions.” D’Arcy also called into question the university’s motives in honoring Obama: “As a Catholic university, Notre Dame must ask itself, if by this decision it has chosen prestige over truth.”

After D’Arcy’s statement, those of Cardinal Francis George—president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and shepherd of the neighboring Chicago archdiocese—have been the most significant rebuke of Notre Dame’s commencement decision. Speaking at a conference hosted by the archdiocese’s Respect Life and Evangelization offices, George brought the university’s Catholic identity and its related responsibilities to the forefront: “Whatever else is clear, it is clear that Notre Dame didn’t understand what it means to be Catholic when they issued this invitation…. So quite apart from the president’s own positions, which are well known, the problem is in that you have a Catholic university—the flagship Catholic university—do something that brought extreme embarrassment to many, many people who are Catholic.” George also called concerned Catholics to action, encouraging them “to do what you are supposed to be doing: to call, to email, to write letters, to express what’s in your heart about this: the embarrassment, the difficulties.”

In addition to the US bishops who have criticized the university’s move, prominent Notre Dame faculty members Ralph McInerny and Charles Rice have also done so, as have leading scholars James V. Schall of Georgetown University, Hadley Arkes of Amherst College, George Weigel of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and Francis Beckwith, professor at Baylor University and visiting fellow at the Center for Ethics and Culture at Notre Dame.

Bishops’ statements on Notre Dame’s invitation to Barack Obama:

Bishop John D’Arcy, Fort Wayne-South Bend
Cardinal Francis George, Chicago
Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Galveston-Houston
Archbishop Timothy Dolan, New York 
Archbishop John Nienstedt, St. Paul-Minneapolis 
Archbishop Eusebius Beltran, Oklahoma City
Bishop Edward Slattery, Tulsa
Archbishop John Myers, Newark
Archbishop Alfred Hughs, New Orleans
Bishop Joseph Martino and Auxiliary Bishop John Dougherty, Scranton
Bishop Thomas Doran, Rockford, Ill.
Bishop Thomas Olmsted, Phoenix
Bishop Gregory Aymond, Austin
Bishop Robert Lynch, St. Petersburg
Bishop R. Walker Nickless, Sioux City
- (Paul Schenck, on behalf of) Bishop Kevin Rhoades, Harrisburg, Pa.
Bishop William Lori, Bridgeport, Conn. 
Bishop George Murry, S.J., Youngstown, Ohio 
Bishop Anthony Basil Taylor, Little Rock  
Archbishop Jose Gomez and Auxiliary Bishop Oscar Cantu, San Antonio  
Bishop Alexander Sample, Marquette, Mich.  
Bishop Jerome Listecki, LaCrosse, Wis. 
Bishop William Higi, Lafayette, Ind.  
Bishop Samuel Aquila, Fargo, ND  
Archbishop Edwin O'Brien, Baltimore  
Archbishop Daniel Buechlein, Indianapolis  
Bishop Robert Baker, Birmingham, Ala.  
Bishop Gerald Barbarito, Palm Beach, Fla.   
Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz, Lincoln, Neb.   
Bishop Richard Stika, Knoxville, Tenn.  
- Bishop Robert Finn, Kansas City-St. Joseph
Bishop Thomas Wenski, Orlando
- (Dan Andriacco, on behalf of) Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk, Cincinnati
Bishop George Lucas, Springfield, Ill.
Bishop Leonard Blair, Toledo
Bishop Gerald Gettelfinger, Evansville, Ind.
Bishop Joseph Latino, Jackson, Miss.
Bishop Paul Coakley, Salina, Kan.
Bishop Robert Vasa, Baker, Ore.
Bishop Victor Galeone, St. Augustine, Fla.
Bishop David Zubik, Pittsburgh
Bishop Paul Loverde, Arlington, Va.
- Bishop John LeVoir, New Ulm, Minn.
- Bishop Joseph Naumann, Kansas City, Kansas
- Cardinal Justin Rigali, Philadelphia
Bishop Joseph Galante, Camden, N.J.
Bishop Peter Jugis, Charlotte, N.C.
Bishop Glen John Provost, Lake Charles, La.
Archbishiop Charles Chaput, Denver
Bishop James V. Johnston, Springfield-Cape Girardeau, Mo.
Bishop John McCormack, Manchester, N.H.
Bishop Bernard Harrington, Winona, Minn.
Bishop Michael Warfel, Great Falls-Billings, Mont.
Bishop Robert Morlino, Madison, Wisc.
- (Susan Gibbs, on behalf of) Archbishop Donald Wuerl, Washington, D.C.
Bishop Michael Jackels, Wichita, Kan.
Bishop William Murphy, Rockville Centre, N.Y
Bishop Raymundo Pena, Brownsville, Texas
Bishop Edward Cullen, Allentown, Pa. 
Bishop Robert Hermann, St. Louis, Mo.  
Bishop George Thomas, Helena, Mont.   
Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, Philadelphia (emeritus)   
Bishop Lawrence Brandt, Greensburg, Pa.  
Bishop David Ricken, Green Bay, Wisc.   
Bishop Sam Jacobs, Houma-Thibodaux    
Bishop John Smith, Trenton, N.J.     
Bishop Roger Gries, Cleveland, Ohio      
Bishop John Gaydos, Jefferson City, Mo.       
Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio, Brooklyn, N.Y.        
Bishop Joseph Adamec, Altoona-Johnstown, Pa.         
Bishop Frank Dewane, Venice, Fla.          
Bishop John Yanta, Amarillo, Texas (emeritus)             
Auxiliary Bishop James Conley, Denver         
Bishop Donald Trautman, Erie, Pa.            
Archbishop-elect Robert Carlson, St. Louis, Mo.             
Bishop Michael Sheridan, Colorado Springs, Colo.

Catherine Harmon is managing editor of Catholic World Report.

 

Comments
Add New Search
charles smith  - md   |2009-04-03 22:06:09
Am from San Diego and have not yet heard from Bishop Brom on the Notre Dame/Obama situation.Perhaps he has his plate full with the questions surrounding the catholicity of his own University of San Diego???
Anonymous   |2009-04-13 12:41:50
I agree the universirty is quite liberal in its way of thinking. (SAD)
NewOrleansPuma  - No Interest in Engagement   |2009-04-04 15:19:38
Barack Obama is neither open to or interested in an engagement on the issue of abortion. Where was Fr. Jenkins during the campaign?

When asked by a fundamentalist preacher re the issues surrounding children in utero ...Obama cited how that question is beyond his pay grade...

Catholics who voted for man will increasingly see what a major error they have made and not just on this issue.
Kirk   |2009-04-04 18:57:23
This nonsense about engagement is such a canard. No need to invite him to Notre Dame for Commencement to engage on the issues. Invite him to Notre Dame to debate the most articulate defenders of the Catholic position on the life issues. See if he comes then.
Anonymous   |2009-04-13 12:43:34
good point. he will need his teleprompter
charles smith  - mdThe   |2009-04-05 15:26:46
The ND grads will get a discussion alright from Obama.......It will cover "social justice" issues such as fairness as defined by Richard Rorty, egalitarianism as defined by John Rawls all wrapped up in Liberation Theology code words as defined by James Coles and Jeremiah Wright.........AND MOST OF THEM WILL BUY IT!!!!!
CWR Reader   |2009-04-06 07:06:22
Karl Mauer reports that Bishop Robert Molino of Madison, Wisconsin remarked on the situation as well during remarks to a prayer breakfast sponsored by Catholic Citizens of Illinois: http://www.catholiccitizens.org/views/contentview.asp?c=49889.
Justin in Ohio  - Bishop Murry of Youngstown also responded   |2009-04-06 07:14:45
Bishop George Murry of the Diocese of Youngstown, OH has also weighed in and criticized Notre Dame:

http://www.cathexpo.org/articledetails.aspx?articleid=240
Notre Dame researcher   |2009-04-06 10:24:01

Prof. Freddoso is another faculty member who spoke at the Notre Dame prayer service on Palm Sunday.
His statement was posted by Francis Beckwith
http://romereturn.blogspot.com/2009/04/notre-dame-professor-fred-freddosos.html

Also Fr. John Cochran a law professor was interviewed about it in Rome and stated that the invitation/proposal of honorary doctorate was wrong and he sided with Bishop DÁrcy.
The priest acknowledged his concurrence with Bishop John D’Arcy of the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, who gave a public statement Tuesday on his decision not to attend the university's graduation ceremony.

Father Coughlin explained: "This action on the part of the university is inconsistent with the rules established by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that prohibit honors from being bestowed by Catholic institutions on public figures who have clear records that are contrary to the Church's fundamental moral teaching.

"There can be no question that the inviolable dignity of each human person and the defense of innocent human life are fundamental to the Church's teaching. One who publically opposes in word and action this truth should not be honored by a Catholic university."


See zenit:
http://www.zenit.org/article-25474?l=english[/b]
[/b]
Notre Dame researcher   |2009-04-06 10:25:31
Professor of Law
Father Coughlin explained: "This action on the part of the university is inconsistent with the rules established by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that prohibit honors from being bestowed by Catholic institutions on public figures who have clear records that are contrary to the Church's fundamental moral teaching.

"There can be no question that the inviolable dignity of each human person and the defense of innocent human life are fundamental to the Church's teaching. One who publically opposes in word and action this truth should not be honored by a Catholic university."


See zenit:
http://www.zenit.org/article-25474?l=english[/b]
[/b]
Mark Randall  - Catholic College President Also Speaks Out     |2009-04-06 10:35:43
Fr. Robert Cook, president of Wyoming Catholic College has also criticized Notre Dame over this issue.
Read his letter to Fr. Jenkins here:
http://www.wyomingcatholiccollege.com/Home/tabid/105/ctl/Details/mid/457/ItemID/101/Default.aspx?SkinSrc=[G]%2fSkins%2fWCC-Blue%2fDualContent&ContainerSrc=[G]%2fContainers%2fWCC-Blue%2fSwoosh-NoBorder
MJA   |2009-04-07 11:50:20
Bishop Robert J. Baker from Birmingham, Alabama has also spoken out against this.
Deo volente  - Archbishop Edwin O'Brien Supports Bishop D'Arcy     |2009-04-07 15:22:01
This story was reported on April 7th in the Catholic Review, the Archdiocesan paper of Baltimore.

[/color].aspx?action=5978' title='Visit http://www.catholicreview.org/subpages/storyarchnew.aspx?action=5978'>http://www.catholicreview.org/subpages/storyarchnew[color=black].aspx?action=5978
catherine kennedy  - NO go zone why obama shouldnt go to notre dame   |2009-04-10 13:11:48
We, AUSSIE KENNEDYS say well done to ALL the pro life USA Catholic Clergy and laity that have spoken out against the impending visit of President Obama to Notre Dame.Che bravos encore! Please keep up the good work pro lifers as you give heart to so many worldwide that believe in the right to life of all!

Now the University of Notre Dame can run all the excuses it likes, to justify the visit of Obama , but the bottom line always is that innocent preborn human life needs continual and UNASSAILABLE protection from both the pro - abortion forces and the pro abortion mindset that is running RANCID in the world!
It is self evident that any person planning to attend at Notre Dame commencement day would NOT be alive, not even a head of government if they had been aborted! but is this ever REFLECTED upon?Bet Not!

So pro abortion speakers should NOT be rewarded with any awards permanent as rewarding those that are pro choice may amongst other things serve to both undermine and dilute the Pro life message!
Pro choice/pro abortionists cant it have both ways ie openly work against the Catholic Church on such a fundamental issue and then accept awards from a prominent Church insitute such as Notre Dame! Where is the logic there and besides how can such acceptors feel comfortable about taking an award that has drawn so much controversy!
Wouldnt it be better for all if such a person desisted from attending!
The University should have thought twice before it issued such an inflammatory invitation! It should be rescinded!
Now if Australia could ban prominent pro abortion speakers* way back in 1972, then why cant the USA follow suit 37 years later! Suggestion get a pro life speaker to take Obama's place!

Now life is not just for the privileged, the planned, the perfect!
Protect the innocent vioceless defenceless unborn they are our future, the next generation!
Now, No one ever has the moral superiority to take an unborns life! and why do eg pro choice politicians that have had their own chance at life, then use their own lives to work so hard against the innocent preborn that have done these pro chioce politicains no harm ever where is the fairness here ! And how would these politicians feel if the situation was reversed and they the politicians were back in the womb fighting for their own life bet those pro choicers( high flyers or not) would all beg please oh please let us live!
So its just not right that Pro choice Obama is coming to Notre Dame and getting an award simple as that!
KENNEDYS, Melbourne Australia!

* Germaine Greer high profile academic was asked not to speak at her alma mater Star of the Sea Gardenvale Brighton Victoria 1972 becaus she Greer was pro abortion!
catherine kennedy  - no go zone no obama to NOTRE DAME   |2009-04-10 13:13:49
We, AUSSIE KENNEDYS say well done to ALL the pro life USA Catholic Clergy and laity that have spoken out against the impending visit of President Obama to Notre Dame.Che bravos encore! Please keep up the good work pro lifers as you give heart to so many worldwide that believe in the right to life of all!

Now the University of Notre Dame can run all the excuses it likes, to justify the visit of Obama , but the bottom line always is that innocent preborn human life needs continual and UNASSAILABLE protection from both the pro - abortion forces and the pro abortion mindset that is running RANCID in the world!
It is self evident that any person planning to attend at Notre Dame commencement day would NOT be alive, not even a head of government if they had been aborted! but is this ever REFLECTED upon?Bet Not!

So pro abortion speakers should NOT be rewarded with any awards permanent as rewarding those that are pro choice may amongst other things serve to both undermine and dilute the Pro life message!
Pro choice/pro abortionists cant it have both ways ie openly work against the Catholic Church on such a fundamental issue and then accept awards from a prominent Church insitute such as Notre Dame! Where is the logic there and besides how can such acceptors feel comfortable about taking an award that has drawn so much controversy!
Wouldnt it be better for all if such a person desisted from attending!
The University should have thought twice before it issued such an inflammatory invitation! It should be rescinded!
Now if Australia could ban prominent pro abortion speakers* way back in 1972, then why cant the USA follow suit 37 years later! Suggestion get a pro life speaker to take Obama's place!

Now life is not just for the privileged, the planned, the perfect!
Protect the innocent vioceless defenceless unborn they are our future, the next generation!
Now, No one ever has the moral superiority to take an unborns life! and why do eg pro choice politicians that have had their own chance at life, then use their own lives to work so hard against the innocent preborn that have done these pro chioce politicains no harm ever where is the fairness here ! And how would these politicians feel if the situation was reversed and they the politicians were back in the womb fighting for their own life bet those pro choicers( high flyers or not) would all beg please oh please let us live!
So its just not right that Pro choice Obama is coming to Notre Dame and getting an award simple as that!
KENNEDYS, Melbourne Australia!

* Germaine Greer high profile academic was asked not to speak at her alma mater Star of the Sea Gardenvale Brighton Victoria 1972 becaus she Greer was pro abortion!
catherine kennedy  - dont REWARD pro chioce behaviour   |2009-04-10 13:19:51
Rewarding those that are pro choice may amongst other things serve to both undermine and dilute the Pro life message!
Pro choice/pro abortionists cant it have both ways ie openly work against the Catholic Church on such a fundamental issue and then accept awards from a prominent Church insitute such as Notre Dame! Where is the logic there and besides how can such acceptors feel comfortable about taking an award that has drawn so much controversy!
Wouldnt it be better for all if such a person desisted from attending!
The University should have thought twice before it issued such an inflammatory invitation! It should be rescinded!
Now if Australia could ban prominent pro abortion speakers* way back in 1972, then why cant the USA follow suit 37 years later! Suggestion get a pro life speaker to take Obama's place!

Now life is not just for the privileged, the planned, the perfect!
Protect the innocent vioceless defenceless unborn they are our future, the next generation!
Now, No one ever has the moral superiority to take an unborns life! and why do eg pro choice politicians that have had their own chance at life, then use their own lives to work so hard against the innocent preborn that have done these pro chioce politicains no harm ever where is the fairness here ! And how would these politicians feel if the situation was reversed and they the politicians were back in the womb fighting for their own life bet those pro choicers( high flyers or not) would all beg please oh please let us live!
So its just not right that Pro choice Obama is coming to Notre Dame and getting an award simple as that!
KENNEDYS, Melbourne Australia!

* Germaine Greer high profile academic was asked not to speak at her alma mater Star of the Sea Gardenvale Brighton Victoria 1972 becaus she Greer was pro abortion!
catherine kennedy  - LIFE IS not Just NOT for the Planned, the perfect,   |2009-04-10 13:25:08
Now life is not just for the privileged, the planned, the perfect!
Protect the innocent voiceless defenceless unborn they are our future, the next generation!
Now, No one ever has the moral superiority to take an unborns life! and why do eg pro choice politicians that have had their own chance at life, then use their own lives to work so hard against the innocent preborn that have done these pro choice politicians no harm ever where is the fairness here ! And how would these politicians feel if the situation was reversed and they the politicians were back in the womb fighting for their own life bet those pro choicers( high flyers or not) would all beg please oh please let us live!
So its just not right that Pro choice Obama is coming to Notre Dame and getting an award simple as that!
KENNEDYS, Melbourne Australia!

* Germaine Greer high profile academic was asked not to speak at her alma mater Star of the Sea Gardenvale Brighton Victoria 1972 becaus she Greer was pro abortion!
Fr. Rodolfo D. Vasquez  - 39 Bishop's, where are the others?     |2009-04-10 17:54:11
Texas Commander at the Alamo drew a line in the sand for the men to declare whether they would stay to fight. The Notre Dame controversy demands the Bishop's declare which side of the fight they are on.

Dear Bishop's you must speak out now, or we will hold you accountable for the lack of your courage.
Anonymous   |2009-04-11 13:06:20
Deceiving Appearances

The Holy Roman Catholic Church will not fall if Mr. Obama decides to take the honor offered to him. Conversely, Notre Dame University will not cease to exist as a result of their decision. Yet, in scope of this, I would imagine that it would be wise for those who accept gifts not to bite the hand of the giver. The actions of both will prove what they both represent as both individuals and as an institution. Ultimately, the Church will have to attend to the matter and that decision will be final. This is how the Church handles situations, and is the reason it has survived, under the most dire of consequences and situations, for over 1500 years, and will continue to do so in the God given future. Let no one be deceived on this point.

However, it is my personal opinion that Notre Dame may suffer greatly by if the event actually occurs. It goes against everything that the University allegedly professes and is a slap in the face to all Catholics and past alumni of the University, respectively. They will have willingly given up their status in the scope of the Church, which is the representation of Christ on earth, and this, for a mere 30 pieces of silver. All this for a brief and fleeting vain prestige in the eyes of the world! Perhaps their idea of what constitutes someone to be bestowed certain honors is confused by blind ambition, pride, arrogance, liberalism or modernism of some sort.

I have always found it logical that persons should only accept honors in the light of their work, and wonder now if this logic has been abandoned at the University. The aspects of the ideas of plain respect, which is a seemingly thin word these days, seems to have also been abandoned, given the evidence of the possibility of the event even being considered to commence.

Logically, I can see few graduates, if any, with any moral scruples, or even a twinge of conscience will even be attending the ceremonies. If such an event occurs, it will in turn prove the mettle in which the graduates are made of. In any sense, there some of those in the public who will not be suprised at the outcome of it all. The clergy are absolutely correct in their actions in this and anyone who calls himself or herself truly Catholic will back them up without hesitation or fear in committing any error. They have made their stand, and we can only wait at this point. Some may think it is some sort of a game, but one should be reminded that it is not, as those it affects are unable to defend themselves,and the price is too high to ponder concerning the consequences in the future. It is time to make changes in a great deal of things today, and the Church never backs down in any challenge She faces or sells out to anyone or anything. Period.

It would do well for many to see the true reasons, which is the acquisition of vain honors and the self-promoting actions, by both parties, behind this and not so much the secular politics or personal interpretative biblical aspects, which contain only opinion and not reason. True, the Church involves Herself, but this is a moral necessity. There can be no other way.

The issue should not be so much about personal opinions in religion, but more on a moral level, which any heretic or heathen can possess, in some degree, albeit they be erroneous concerning certain elements of beliefs. The Church is responsible to take a stand against that which is wrong, for to ignore the issue is to condone the issue.

Plainly expostulated, one sees that a CATHOLIC university is proposing to invite an individual (I don't care what position they may be in) who professes one thing but does the other, and who may not be qualified, in order to boost their public image. It cheapens the whole idea of intellectual pursuit and the honor achieved through real and proven work. Additionally, it makes a farce out of the honor (and labour) of a law degree that should only be conferred after great study. This event, if it should take place, should prove very interesting in the future of all parties involved.

Jerald Franklin Archer (tartini)
Jerald Franklin Archer  - Decieving Appearances   |2009-04-11 13:10:22
occurs. It goes against everything that the University allegedly professes and is a slap in the face to all Catholics and past alumni of the University, respectively. They will have willingly given up their status in the scope of the Church, which is the representation of Christ on earth, and this, for a mere 30 pieces of silver. All this for a brief and fleeting vain prestige in the eyes of the world! Perhaps their idea of what constitutes someone to be bestowed certain honors is confused by blind ambition or arrogance of some sort. I have always found it logical that persons should only accept honors in the light of their work, and wonder now if this logic has been abandoned at the University. Respect, which is a seemingly thin word these days, seems to have also been abandoned, given the evidence of the possibility of the event even being considered to commence.
Jerald Franklin Archer  - Decieving Appearances   |2009-04-11 13:11:29
Logically, I can see few graduates, if any, with any moral scruples, or even a twinge of conscience will even be attending the ceremonies. If such an event occurs, it will in turn prove the mettle in which the graduates are made of. In any sense, there are those in public who will not be suprised at the outcome of it all. The clergy are absolutely correct in their actions in this and anyone who calls himself or herself truly Catholic will back them up without hesitation or fear in committing any error. It is time to make changes in a great deal of things today, and the Church never backs down in any challenge She faces or sells out to anyone or anything. Period.
Jerald Franklin Archer   |2009-04-11 13:12:33
It would do well for many to see the true reasons, which is the acquisition of vain honors and the self-promoting actions, by both parties, behind this and not so much the secular politics or personal interpretative biblical aspects, which contain only opinion and not reason. The issue should not be so much about personal opinions in religion, but more on a moral level, which a heretic or heathen can possess, in some degree, albeit erroneous concerning certain elements. The Church is responsible to take a stand against that which is wrong, for to ignore the issue is to condone the issue.

Plainly expostulated, one sees that a CATHOLIC university is proposing to invite an individual (I don't care what position they may be in) who professes one thing but does the other, to boost their image. This event, if it should take place, should prove very interesting in the future of all parties involved.

Jerald Franklin Archer (tartini)
josediaz63@gmail.com  - Am I Somewhat Unclear   |2009-04-12 07:22:27
Even my closest relations who merely express private beliefs which are in my heart morally unacceptable, I find difficult not to distance myself from and I find challenged to even maintain candid exchange. To publicly bestow honor to a person who not just confides but concretizes what I feel is profoundly unjust and demolishing of my very self and everyone else, may I never be so alienated to myself that I can even defend giving such a honorariums.
Sharon  - Rescind that invitation - Go Irish!   |2009-04-13 06:21:21
God works in mysterious ways. When have you seen Catholics pull together as much as this Notre Dame issue has promoted? There were over 50% of Catholics that voted for the pro abortionist, Obama. Could it be that the majority of those people did not know about Obama's pro abortion record when they voted? If that is the case then what better way to bring it into focus than to have Obama in the middle of a scandal which highlights his record? Do you really think that if Obama was running today that he would get any where near the number of Catholic voters? Who knows maybe this scandal is doing some good after all. Perhaps a Hail Mary pass (by way of rescinding the invitation)with seconds remaining (as in just before graduation) is the perfect play for the sacred football school of Our Lady! What better way to get the crowd on their feet in support of Catholicism everywhere!
suzyscone   |2009-04-13 12:01:14
Fr. Jenkins and his board should resign. Shame on them!
Louis T Luca Jr   |2009-04-13 14:04:51
After all the scandals the Church has gone through, the Magisterium should recognize that
they should jettison these so-called catholic
universities. Better a small Catholic church than a corrupted one. It will be easier for a camel to go thru the eye of a needle than for these so-called catholics who go to communion as apostates. How quaint for a Bishop to explain why they don't refuse these politicians the Eucharist, because 'they're my friend.' Sound like St. Paul to you.
Judy  - To invite is to condone to the world   |2009-04-14 03:44:26
I add my anger and disappointment to the letters that have been sent. Such a terrible example for a Catholic college to honor, and with this honor, condone the beliefs of a man that must be truly an example of today's satan. He seems to have a golden tongue that entices people into believing he can walk on water.
Ruben Pradier   |2009-04-23 06:17:16
A Catholique u niversity musn't invit a pro abortion person even if he is the president .
John J Heary  - MORE BISHOPS NEED TO DIRECT COMMENTS TO UNIVERSITI     |2009-04-23 07:58:49
Currently there are three universities that need to hear from more bishops. Georgetown covered the Cross when President Obama spoke there last week and the school law journal is giving an award to Vice President Biden. In Philadelphia, St. Joseph's University has invited Chris Matthews, a pro-abortion network journalist, to speak at their commencement, and then there is Notre Dame.

I am so hurt by those bishops who have not responded. This is still the Pauline year and we need to be more like him, otherwise it will be the same as it was 2000 years ago.

I am sending an empty red envelope to Fr. Jenkins to remind him of one more abortion that the commencement invitation has caused. I have a large collection of ND memorabilia that I can no longer display/wear, so I am sending it back. I expect book store sales might drop.
smcirish  - Send back your Notre Dame memorabilia   |2009-04-26 20:02:31
John J Heary,

That is a great idea! Anyone with Notre Dame memorabilia, send it all back to President Father Jenkins' office. Here is his address:

Fr. Jenkins - President
317 Main Building
Notre Dame, IN 46556


Fr. Robert Sirico returned a statue of Lladro Blessed Mother that Notre Dame gave to him as a gift. See LifeSiteNews article:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09040907.html
Dan B.  - THE REAL POINT   |2009-04-25 17:52:16
The reason for the Notre Dame Commencement drama is fairly simple and straightforward. Most are missing the point.

1. Obama was invited by Notre Dame to be its Commencement speaker and to receive an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree. The ultimate choice for Obama as speaker is the responsibility of Fr. Jenkins as President of the University.

2. Father Jenkins did not seek the approval of his local Bishop - John D'Arcy regarding the choice of Obama - a choice that most would agree may have been problematic for the University as well as many lay Catholics.

3. Upon hearing the news, Bishop D'Arcy objected to the selection of Obama and here is the reason. There is a Directive issued in 2004 by the USCCB (the American Bishops) providing guidance especially for Catholic Institutions when engaging people that have views (particularly moral views) that differ from the Catholic Church. The Directive is entitled Catholics in Political Life and can be found here: (http://www.usccb.org/bishops/catholicsinpoliticallife.shtml)

The key paragraph in this Directive is as follows: [u]"The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions."

The key words are "awards" and "platforms". Obama is clearly being given a platform - Commencement speaker. There is also no doubt that he is getting an award - Honorary Doctor of Laws.

Bishop D'Arcy's objection to the selection of Obama has since been supported vocally by as many as 50 additional US Bishops many of whom have written directly to Fr. Jenkins voicing their objection.

Fr. Jenkins continues to distance himself from the right and just authority of the Bishops as he continues to search for wiggle room and a way around the 2004 Directive.

4. Either the Catholic Church is governed by its Bishops tasked with enforcing its teachings as promulgated by the Magisterium as well as its own local Directives or it is not so governed.

5. If it is, Fr. Jenkins is in clear violation of the Directives and is also disobedient to the Canonical authority of his local Bishop - John D'Arcy.

6. Though many Catholics and ND Alums object to the thought of President Obama being anywhere near campus let alone its 2009 Commencement speaker, very many Catholics rightly objecting as explained above would not have objected if Fr. Jenkins would have simply set aside his own arrogance and done things according to Catholic protocol, with the approval of his local Bishop and not in violation of any USCCB Directives.

7. Father Jenkins should have sought the advice and guidance of Bishop D'Arcy regarding UND offering to engage in constructive dialogue with President Obama. Though Bishop D'Arcy would have ruled out participation in Commencement as the platform for engagement, he may have suggested many other venues at UND that would have been quite appropriate and well within all Catholic guidelines governing invitations and engagements to people with differing views from Catholics.

8. Most Catholics are open to the thought of dialogue with those not sharing traditional Catholic views on today's important topics. However, most lay Catholics love and support their local Bishops while trying to adhere to the true teachings of the Church. It is this love and support of the Bishops that Fr. Jenkins has greatly underestimated and for this reason, he bears full responsibility for the drama now unfolding at his University.
smcirish  - What are a Bishop's Disciplinary Options?   |2009-04-26 20:32:39
http://home.earthlink.net/~frrob/docs2/CatInst4.rtf

Check out the article above by Fr. Robert Johansen. It give the best information I have seen on what a Bishop's disciplinary options are for Catholic Institutions in their diocese.

Great references from Canon law, and Apostolic constitution "Ex Corde Ecclesiae".

See this real life example where Bishop Paul S. Loverde of Arlington strips Notre Dame Academy of their Catholic Identity.
http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=30734
Tom Lavin  - Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee Silent     |2009-04-28 06:40:17
After having written to Bishop John H. Ricard twice over the last 3 weeks, we still haven't heard his position on the ND issue. I have been trying to contact Bishop Ricard via webmaster@ptdiocese.org
since no other E-mail was listed for him at his web site:

http://www.ptdiocese.org/

or related

http://www.thefloridacatholic.org/pt/pthp.php

Please help the parishoners of the PT Diocese to learn of their Bishop's PUBLIC POSITION.
John J Heary  - My Letter of Today - Fr. Jenkins     |2009-05-01 12:52:56
May 1, 2009


Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., President
Notre Dame University
400 Main Building
Notre Dame, IN 46556


Dear Father Jenkins:

In my entire life, I never thought I would see the day I am giving up my support for Notre Dame. What has been a point of pride for me, as a Catholic, has crumbled into a sorry image. Sadly, you tarnished the image of the Blessed Mother, for whom the university is named.

Today begins the month of Mary, our Mother. It is the day of May processions to honor the Mother of our beloved Savior. It is during this month Notre Dame will stoop to the lowest level in the school’s history when it gives recognition to a pro-abortion politician, the president of the United States.

In addition to Notre Dame, you too have personally sustained major damage to your reputation. It is so depressing that so many people have stepped forward to condemn your actions and comments, however you deserve this condemnation. Your bishop has had to reprimand you about your failure to follow required procedures and your failure seek his counsel before moving ahead with this most egregious of errors. It is tragic that a bishop has to tell his priest that he scandalized many Catholics and other people of good will. It is no wonder your bishop is among many that advocates your resignation.

My faith teaches me that, if I influence others to commit sin, I too have committed sin. Your failure to defer to your bishop for instruction and your influence of Catholics in favor of abortion, by giving recognition and an award, leads me to believe you have committed sin. In last Sunday’s readings (1 St. John, 2.4 & 2.6), you will find: “He, who says that he knows him, and does not keep his commandments, is a liar and the truth is not in him…… He, who says that he abides in him, ought himself also to walk just as he walked”. You have not walked the walk or talked the talk.

Priests and bishops are refusing Communion to individuals who support these abortion murders. In February 2009, Bishop Martino formally ordered all ministers of Holy Communion as follows: "Those whose unworthiness to receive Holy Communion is known publicly to the Church must be refused Holy Communion in order to prevent sacrilege and to prevent the Catholic in question from committing further grave sin through unworthy reception.". This leaves me to believe that if you violate the bishops directives relating to grievous sin, then you too, have committed sin, and should not receive Communion.

Your recent comments that “…..President Obama coming to this campus has been a little clouded by that controversy” is shameful. It is an insult to Catholics, in particular, when you know 344,000 people have signed the Cardinal Newman Society petition, and 53 bishops have signed on to protest your disgraceful actions. You are in denial and the unborn and murdered infants are suffering. I say this because you are in defiance of the 2004 bishops’ statements and that of the Holy Father, who gave a directive one year ago while visiting the U. S. when he told universities to be more Catholic and follow the faith.

Sadly, you are not alone, for Georgetown has demonstrated recently that they are less Catholic when they covered symbols of our Christianity at the directive of the Obama administration while he gave a speech. St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia has decided to disregard the Pope as well, for they will permit a pro-abortion network news personality to speak at their commencement and award him during Mary’s month.

When you give this recognition to the US president, it will be during the Jubilee Year of St. Paul. The Church has proclaimed the great challenges facing St. Paul in converting people far and wide, yet your actions are contrary to St. Paul by convincing some Catholics that Notre Dame approves of abortions. You will receive under separate cover an empty red envelope from me as a reminder of another murder of an infant by your actions. Remember this US president voted in favor of legislation that would murder infants who are actually born after a botched abortion. He was the only one who voted in favor of such a horrific procedure.

How shameful that you have prevented Mary Ann Glendon, the U. S. ambassador to the Vatican, from receiving the Laetare Medal at the commencement. Of course, she has refused to attend. As she noted, the tragedy is that the graduating students and family suffer a loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1     |2009-05-01 13:03:24
It is so depressing that so many people have stepped forward to condemn your actions and comments, however you deserve this condemnation. Your bishop has had to reprimand you about your failure to follow required procedures and your failure seek his counsel before moving ahead with this most egregious of errors. It is tragic that a bishop has to tell his priest that he scandalized many Catholics and other people of good will. It is no wonder your bishop is among many that advocates your resignation.

My faith teaches me that, if I influence others to commit sin, I too have committed sin. Your failure to defer to your bishop for instruction and your influence of Catholics in favor of abortion, by giving recognition and an award, leads me to believe you have committed sin. In last Sunday’s readings (1 St. John, 2.4 & 2.6), you will find: “He, who says that he knows him, and does not keep his commandments, is a liar and the truth is not in him…… He, who says that he abides in him, ought himself also to walk just as he walked”. You have not walked the walk or talked the talk.

Priests and bishops are refusing Communion to individuals who support these abortion murders. In February 2009, Bishop Martino formally ordered all ministers of Holy Communion as follows: "Those whose unworthiness to receive Holy Communion is known publicly to the Church must be refused Holy Communion in order to prevent sacrilege and to prevent the Catholic in question from committing further grave sin through unworthy reception.". This leaves me to believe that if you violate the bishops directives relating to grievous sin, then you too, have committed sin, and should not receive Communion.

Your recent comments that “…..President Obama coming to this campus has been a little clouded by that controversy” is shameful. It is an insult to Catholics, in particular, when you know 344,000 people have signed the Cardinal Newman Society petition, and 53 bishops have signed on to protest your disgraceful actions. You are in denial and the unborn and murdered infants are suffering. I say this because you are in defiance of the 2004 bishops’ statements and that of the Holy Father, who gave a directive one year ago while visiting the U. S. when he told universities to be more Catholic and follow the faith.

Sadly, you are not alone, for Georgetown has demonstrated recently that they are less Catholic when they covered symbols of our Christianity at the directive of the Obama administration while he gave a speech. St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia has decided to disregard the Pope as well, for they will permit a pro-abortion network news personality to speak at their commencement and award him during Mary’s month.

When you give this recognition to the US president, it will be during the Jubilee Year of St. Paul. The Church has proclaimed the great challenges facing St. Paul in converting people far and wide, yet your actions are contrary to St. Paul by convincing some Catholics that Notre Dame approves of abortions. You will receive under separate cover an empty red envelope from me as a reminder of another murder of an infant by your actions. Remember this US president voted in favor of legislation that would murder infants who are actually born after a botched abortion. He was the only one who voted in favor of such a horrific procedure.

How shameful that you have prevented Mary Ann Glendon, the U. S. ambassador to the Vatican, from receiving the Laetare Medal at the commencement. Of course, she has refused to attend. As she noted, the tragedy is that the graduating students and family suffer a loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p3   |2009-05-01 13:09:03
and the truth is not in him…… He, who says that he abides in him, ought himself also to walk just as he walked”. You have not walked the walk or talked the talk.

Priests and bishops are refusing Communion to individuals who support these abortion murders. In February 2009, Bishop Martino formally ordered all ministers of Holy Communion as follows: "Those whose unworthiness to receive Holy Communion is known publicly to the Church must be refused Holy Communion in order to prevent sacrilege and to prevent the Catholic in question from committing further grave sin through unworthy reception.". This leaves me to believe that if you violate the bishops directives relating to grievous sin, then you too, have committed sin, and should not receive Communion.

Your recent comments that “…..President Obama coming to this campus has been a little clouded by that controversy” is shameful. It is an insult to Catholics, in particular, when you know 344,000 people have signed the Cardinal Newman Society petition, and 53 bishops have signed on to protest your disgraceful actions. You are in denial and the unborn and murdered infants are suffering. I say this because you are in defiance of the 2004 bishops’ statements and that of the Holy Father, who gave a directive one year ago while visiting the U. S. when he told universities to be more Catholic and follow the faith.

Sadly, you are not alone, for Georgetown has demonstrated recently that they are less Catholic when they covered symbols of our Christianity at the directive of the Obama administration while he gave a speech. St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia has decided to disregard the Pope as well, for they will permit a pro-abortion network news personality to speak at their commencement and award him during Mary’s month.

When you give this recognition to the US president, it will be during the Jubilee Year of St. Paul. The Church has proclaimed the great challenges facing St. Paul in converting people far and wide, yet your actions are contrary to St. Paul by convincing some Catholics that Notre Dame approves of abortions. You will receive under separate cover an empty red envelope from me as a reminder of another murder of an infant by your actions. Remember this US president voted in favor of legislation that would murder infants who are actually born after a botched abortion. He was the only one who voted in favor of such a horrific procedure.

How shameful that you have prevented Mary Ann Glendon, the U. S. ambassador to the Vatican, from receiving the Laetare Medal at the commencement. Of course, she has refused to attend. As she noted, the tragedy is that the graduating students and family suffer a loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p4   |2009-05-01 13:11:48
It is an insult to Catholics, in particular, when you know 344,000 people have signed the Cardinal Newman Society petition, and 53 bishops have signed on to protest your disgraceful actions. You are in denial and the unborn and murdered infants are suffering. I say this because you are in defiance of the 2004 bishops’ statements and that of the Holy Father, who gave a directive one year ago while visiting the U. S. when he told universities to be more Catholic and follow the faith.

Sadly, you are not alone, for Georgetown has demonstrated recently that they are less Catholic when they covered symbols of our Christianity at the directive of the Obama administration while he gave a speech. St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia has decided to disregard the Pope as well, for they will permit a pro-abortion network news personality to speak at their commencement and award him during Mary’s month.

When you give this recognition to the US president, it will be during the Jubilee Year of St. Paul. The Church has proclaimed the great challenges facing St. Paul in converting people far and wide, yet your actions are contrary to St. Paul by convincing some Catholics that Notre Dame approves of abortions. You will receive under separate cover an empty red envelope from me as a reminder of another murder of an infant by your actions. Remember this US president voted in favor of legislation that would murder infants who are actually born after a botched abortion. He was the only one who voted in favor of such a horrific procedure.

How shameful that you have prevented Mary Ann Glendon, the U. S. ambassador to the Vatican, from receiving the Laetare Medal at the commencement. Of course, she has refused to attend. As she noted, the tragedy is that the graduating students and family suffer a loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p5   |2009-05-01 13:15:50
When you give this recognition to the US president, it will be during the Jubilee Year of St. Paul. The Church has proclaimed the great challenges facing St. Paul in converting people far and wide, yet your actions are contrary to St. Paul by convincing some Catholics that Notre Dame approves of abortions. You will receive under separate cover an empty red envelope from me as a reminder of another murder of an infant by your actions. Remember this US president voted in favor of legislation that would murder infants who are actually born after a botched abortion. He was the only one who voted in favor of such a horrific procedure.

How shameful that you have prevented Mary Ann Glendon, the U. S. ambassador to the Vatican, from receiving the Laetare Medal at the commencement. Of course, she has refused to attend. As she noted, the tragedy is that the graduating students and family suffer a loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p6   |2009-05-01 13:18:14
loss of what would have been a joyous day. She pointed out that it is not a forum to engage two people with opposing views. Notre Dame has released talking points that having the president and Mary Ann Glendon on the stage to present and hear each others comments would somehow balance the event. This is incomprehensible. This is not in a debatable or compromising issue. This is your faith and the faith on which the university was built. This is not a step toward solution that Archbishop Chaput had in mind when he said “In the United States in 2008, abortion is an acceptable form of homicide. And it will remain that way until Catholics force their political parties and elected officials to act differently.”

Enclosed with this letter, I am sending all of my Notre Dame memorabilia. It includes the following: Can opener that sings ND fight song; CD - Here Come The Irish; book -Talking Irish; videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p7   |2009-05-01 13:20:04
videos – football highlights, Knute Rockne Life Story, Rudy, Wake Up The Echoes; football ticket stub for September 30, 2006; three “T” shirts, including football game day shirt; three sweatshirts including monogrammed shirt with six grandchildren names; baseball cap; replica of sign “Play Like A Champion Today”; set of six glasses; travel mug; seat cushion; nine photo album pages from a visit of September 2006; one book store plastic bag. There are many photos of the religious sites at Notre Dame, including the replica of the Lourdes grotto where our Blessed Mother appeared. The university’s dedication to her is a major reason I was loyal to Notre Dame. However, you have desecrated her name and I can not accept that. I will not support Notre Dame by purchasing any trademark products or make any financial contributions to the university.

I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.



Sincerely,


John J. Heary
John J Heary  - Continuation of Fr. Jenkins Letter of 5/1 p8   |2009-05-01 13:22:43
I urge you to take the brave step and cancel the award and invitation to the president to speak at the commencement. Short of that, please do what so many have pleaded with you. Resign.

Sincerely, John J. Heary
Michael Teissere   |2009-05-04 13:07:58
Would not even one Cardinal, Archbishop, or Bishop from California say something! Bishop Cordelione (please excuse spelling) has it in him, to his credit, probably would say something. Out of all the Bishops, not one has come to the defense of Obama the usurper!
Chris   |2009-05-06 11:19:51
When we see the confusion, embarrasement, uproar, and very specific conflicts this has caused, from the bishop of that archdiocese not attending graduation to the Laetare Award unable to be bestowed on anyone (because who could accept it now after all this), we know we must be dealing with only one entity: the evil one. Satan is delighted, and we will see more of this as the so-called "anointed one"(Mr. Obama)wends his way and his laws through our world. And, of course, since the time of Christ there has only been one way to stop the evil one in his tracks: Prayer and fasting. So get on it, starting with prayers for Fr. Jenkins. This is spiritual warfare now. Know the enemy.
agape   |2009-05-08 18:44:55
Perhaps this all happened when President Obama's staff proposed that ND invite the President to come and deliver the address. i would not discount this possibility that it was not really proposed by ND.

Caught-up in the moment of enthusiastic pride, perhaps the good Father Jenkins sold the board on the matter of simple institutional interests.

Additionally, it became a teaching moment to show ND's ecumenical openness and un-biased objectivity. Gross Institutional pride may have become an occasion of sin.

Pride goeth before many falls.

In the end, it may become an even greater teaching moment to us all, quite different than planned by either party, from Rome to Indiana and most parishes in-between.
plain joe  - re:   |2009-05-10 18:39:59
suzyscone wrote:
Fr. Jenkins and his board should resign. Shame on them!


More than that Fr. Jenkins, ND & a lot of other Catholic universities are schismatic & it MUST be addressed by the Magisterium.
KM   |2009-05-15 04:35:18
On May 6th. Aux. Bishop James Conley (Denver) wrote a "personal and confidential" letter to Fr. Jenkins concerning Pres. Obama's presence at Notre Dame's commencement.
He does not want to reveal the contents of the letter but said I could let you know that he did send one so you could add him to the list of those opposing Obama's presence at ND.

I think there must be other Bishop's who have also written to Fr. Jenkins personally. For various reasons they prefer to weigh in on this issue privately for the time being.

Thanks to all who are supporting the student's at Notre Dame especially those students who have worked tirelessly for ND Response. My daughter is a sophomore at ND and said it was difficult to deal with this issue as well as term papers and finals. But she said they had no choice except to ignore it or deal with it and with Bishop D'Arcy's complete support they have put together a great commencement weekend program.
Please keep the students in your prayers this weekend!
Debbie Whitlock  - A Catholic Comment on Notre Dame   |2009-05-16 12:19:34
The truth is that a Roman Catholic and a person who supports abortion cannot be the same person supporting both oppositions at the same time. These sides are eternally polarized, and seriously schizophrenic in nature is the person who promotes otherwise anywhere, in any position in the world. There cannot be any possible truth in their statements or their actions. If any Roman Catholic, no matter who you are, President of a nation, Speaker of the House, VP of the US, Archbishop of the world's largest city.
If any person or institution, in a world-wide forum, denounces their Creator and his teachings to the world, they should be permanently and publicly excommunicated from the Church for the adverse and irreversible harm they are inflicting against the Church, the faithful members who suffer from their actions, and most of all, the grievous offense these individuals have taken against the Lord himself, not to mention the blood of millions of innocent lives their own hands make them accountable for.

The US Catholic Church and their "leaders, the bishops, archbishops, priests and leaders - have failed miserably to develop & sustain a strong backbone and united voice, and prompt action against all those who have directly attacked the Church and did NOTHING to stop it for many decades now. And now, after years of disgracing the Church, allowing Notre Dame ultimately to disgrace the Catholic Church in this way is unconciousable because you were called by the Lord Himself for this mission.
This is one faithful Catholic who is "mad as hell" at the whole lot of you.
As Abraham Lincoln once told one of his many Union generals, "If you are not going to use your own army, give it to me."

This is not just "a difference of opinion" where we can just all come together as President Obama would have you believe. This is a government and President who directly choose to take the matter of dictating death into his own hands, the business of self-appointment of a god who decides the right of which (type, color, age) of human being will be able to live or die, enacting law mandating that innocent life can be terminated at any time. He can say, “You African-American can live, and you Native-Amercian must die.”

To drive this home to those who do not understand the magnitude of this horrific offense. [This is presented from the Church’s side]. It is like asking a Nazi ruling leader (who lawfully mandated death by extermination at Auschwitz to Jews, or “undesirables”), to be asked by a descendent of Auschwitz, to be its commencement speaker, invited by blind Auschwitz descendents who refuse to acknowledge the great horror and offense of this leader’s country’s actions because the Auschwitz of today is unseen and occurs in safe environments – like a hospital surgery room or an out clinic. And the words regarding it are guilely crafted making it seem like something completely different than what it is.

The descendents want the leader to come because he is “offering the world good in other areas."
But what he is doing (even unknowingly) is grievously evil.
David S   |2009-05-17 02:59:26
While it is nice to see - perhaps for the first time - a unity of some of the bishops in this country....
1] two thirds are silent...shame on them
2] letters are a weak start. The bishops should be there side by side with Fr Pavone and the Catholics who have the guts to be heard, to be seen, and to be Catholic
Gloria Serpa  - Re: Obama at Notre Dame for an honorary degree     |2009-05-17 10:59:37
The Michigan Catholic newspaper, May 15, 2009 edition states that, "Shortly after the honor was announced, Abp. Allen Vigneron voiced his disapproval."
It further states that he sent a letter privately to Fr. Jenkins which "...expressed his disappointment and disagreement with the school's decision." "Abp. Vigneron stands in solidarity with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on this matter..."
KM   |2009-05-17 13:19:52
Bishop D'Arcy made himself very clear to Fr. Jenkins and I'm sure he's grateful for the support of so many Bishops standing with him both in public and privately. But I don't think it's imperative that they all be there in person. South Bend is his diocese and I can't imagine a whole flock of Bishops descending on any diocese without an invitation to do so by the Bishop of that diocese.

I also think it's really sad that protestors with no connection to Notre Dame have used ND as a platform for a radical protest, including getting arrested, even for a good cause. The students worked hard to put together a peaceful and prayerful alternative to the main commencement and I have yet to see much coverage of it. Just the President and people getting arrested. Am I looking in the wrong place?

As my daughter (a rising junior at ND) reminded me though, attention is NOT what the whole alternative commencement program was about. It was a time to pray and affirm the sanctity of life. The ND students listened to their Bishop when they planned their demonstrations and they urged others to "respectfully and constructively demonstrate their disapproval."

"I am supportive of all efforts by NDResponse or any other prayerful and dignified demonstrations by Notre Dame students."
- Bishop J. M. D'Arcy

Many non students chose to do their own thing, even coming in busloads, and went against the wishes of the Bishop and the students and of course the media always loves a dirty fight!

I know many of the students who planned and participated in the events that began on campus last night with the Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament and Adoration and continued today with Mass and a Rosary. Their prayers will wing their way to Heaven and into the hearts of the those who are unsure of whom they can safely turn to in their time of need. God bless them!

The others will sit in jail for awhile and then go find somewhere else to protest and get arrested. I doubt young, scared, pregnant women will turn to people pushing bloodied dolls in baby strollers or holding up graphic signs. God grant peace to those they frighten!
RICARDO NEWBALL   |2009-07-10 16:36:25
I AM NOT DISSAPOINTED AT NOTRE DAME'S ACTIONS BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN THIS COMING FOR YEARS SINCE HIS HOLINESS JOHN PAUL ii WROTE THE MANDATUM WHICH ONLY A HANDFUL IF ANY RESPECTS. AS A HISPANIC CATHOLIC I BEIEVE CATHOLICISM IN THIS COUNTRY LACKS THE MORAL COURAGE TO SATND UP FOR THE PRINCIPLES OF THE CHURCH THIS FOLLOWS IN THE PATHETIC LEADERSHIP OF THE MAJORITY OF THE BISHOPS IN THIS COUNTRY.. THEY SHOULD REMEMBER JEREMIAH 23:1-4
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 

Syndication

Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Joomla Templates by Joomlashack