Vatican City, Jul 4, 2017 / 03:22 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The London hospital where Charlie Gard is living his last days has refused a transfer request from the Pediatric hospital Bambino Gesu in Rome for legal reasons.
“This is sad news,” said Mariella Enoc, President Bambino Gesu, often referred to as the “Pope’s Hospital.” The hospital had offered to transfer Charlie to their facilities from Great Ormond Street Hospital in London (UK), where the child and his family are currently staying.
London and and European courts have ruled that Charlie must be pulled from life support and that he will not be allowed to die at home.
Charlie Gard is a 10-month old suffering a rare, terminal, genetic illness. His parents have lost several legal battles in the fight to prolong the life of their son, including a request to send him to the United States for experimental treatment.
Enoc told Italian media on July 4 that he had offered the transfer after being contacted by Charlie’s mother, Connie Yates.
He added that he wanted to offer the family his support especially because of the Pope’s backing of the family.
On Sunday, July 2, the Holy See Press Office director Greg Burke issued a statement in which Pope Francis called for respect for the will of Charlie Gard’s parents.
“The Holy Father follows with affection and emotion the story of Charlie Gard and expresses his own closeness to his parents,” read a July 2 statement issued by Vatican spokesman Greg Burke.
“He prays for them, wishing that their desire to accompany and care for their own child to the end will be respected.”
On June 30, the day the Charlie’s life support was initially scheduled to be disconnected, the Pope also used his Twitter account to send a clear pro-life message in the infant’s favor.
The hospital in London agreed to allow Charlie’s life support to continue for a few more days, to allow the family more time with their son.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
What legal reasons? Did the UK hospital offer no explanation? The UK hospital claims that Charlie should die and that treatment would do him harm. If that is true how could they allow him to stay on life support “for a few more days to allow the family more time with their son”? If they truly believe keeping him alive is harmful, why are they doing that? They obviously know that keeping him alive is not harmful. Their judgments and rulings have nothing to do with what is best for the child or the parents and family.
The experimental treatment is the one deemed harmful, he’s on life support, which isn’t treatment. It’s a way to prolong life artificially so treatment can take place, and the court deemed on the evidence that he can’t be cured by medicine. It’s frankly disappointing how Catholic outlets are all in on the legal issues but I saw nothing on social media about people praying for a miracle.
Plenty of my fb sites are praying for this child and his family as well as me.Amen!
Well, the pope’s comments were about as powerful as the local weather forecast.
Why would he expect a bunch of pagans from the abortion loving, death panel socialist EU to act any differently. (it’s not about which hospital is involved, the child must die because they said so…and that is the end of it)
And this is the world so many people (Obama, Hillary, Pope Francis…etc) want US to emulate and impress and placate. Sick!! Disgusting!!
So the ishes of the Parents become meaningless? When did Government take over our lives and why do we not protest.
Well, when they started handing out money for everything, when they took over healthcare, when they became the fairness enforcers and the thought police…..