Washington D.C., Apr 6, 2018 / 05:14 pm (CNA).- “The Church, from the very beginning, has always recognized the special and unique role of Peter,” said Cardinal Donald Wuerl at the closing Mass of a Catholic University of America symposium on the 50th anniversary of papal encyclical Humanae Vitae.
The role of Peter – as an authoritative teacher of faith and morals – was reaffirmed, Wuerl believes, by the US bishops’ response to initial controversy over Humanae Vitae.
During the Mass, celebrated in the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, Wuerl spoke of his personal experience as a young priest at the time of Humanae Vitae’s promulgation. He noted that he was taken aback by negative attitudes towards the encyclical.
“As a newly-ordained priest, I came very quickly in ministry to recognize that not every encyclical or apostolic exhortation meets with immediate acceptance,” he said, to laughter among the congregation.
Having begun his first priestly assignment just the year before, Cardinal Wuerl said that he was “surprised” by the “vehement rejection” of the encyclical, particularly in the archdiocese he now leads.
The Archdiocese of Washington, he said, was “one of the largest flashpoints of opposition.”
“I remember attending a lecture on this very campus [The Catholic University of America] in which it was explained to us that the teaching of Paul VI was his own personal views, and that it was not truly a part of the papal magisterium,” said Wuerl.
However, the dissent was far from universal, he said. Priests who agreed with the document and supported the pope as the “universal shepherd” were assisted by the United States Catholic Conference (a precursor to the USCCB) in writing a pastoral letter to help better explain and support the teachings outlined in Humanae Vitae. This letter, titled “Human Life In Our Day,” was published about four months after the encyclical was released.
Wuerl said this experience helped to confirm his beliefs in the importance of the teaching ministry of the pope, in addition to the overall teachings of the document.
“I was impressed then with the alacrity of the response in defense of the teaching office of Saint Peter and therefore the validation of the teaching of Humanae Vitae,” explained Wuerl.
“But there was another lesson that I saw confirmed in those days of dissent from Humanae Vitae – the importance of the teaching role of Peter. The issue was not just what was said, but also who said it.” The pope, regardless of which pope, is “Peter” and has the role of Christ’s vicar, Wuerl said.
Wuerl conceded that there is still much to be done in terms of implementing the teachings of Humanae Vitae for the good of the faithful.
“One half century later, we continue to set forth the teaching of Blessed Pope Paul VI concerning the proper regulation of the propagation of offspring, and over these five decades we have learned that it is not sufficient simply to announce the teaching and repeat the words of the encyclical.”
To assist with this endeavor, the cardinal suggested that this 50th anniversary be viewed as “a call to [….] whom we go out, announce, engage, and walk with as we try to help them grasp and appropriate the teaching of this encyclical.”
“Today then, dear brothers and sisters in Christ, as we commemorate the encyclical letter, Humanae Vitae, we renew our own fidelity to the Vicar of Christ. It is his voice that gives us assurance of the truth of what we profess.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
God bless our Holy Father with strength and stamina.
The Cardinal ? is using HV to affirm all Popes and thus Pope Francis? The Cardinal and literate Catholics should read Romanus Pontifex ( mid fourth large paragraph) by Pope Nicholas V which is the ground work for misery unprecedented in both Americas as it re-turbocharged Portuguese slave trading and property stealing in 1454:
“We [therefore] weighing all and singular the premises with due meditation, and noting that since we had formerly by other letters of ours granted among other things free and ample faculty to the aforesaid King Alfonso — to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit —”
Spain then in 1493 then joined in those rights via Pope Alexander VI ( Spanish) and his Inter Caetera….and the rest is history …and mostly dysfunctional nations wherever Iberia went.
Pope Paul III, the brother of one of Alexander VI’s mistresses, wrote against all four pro slavery Popes in 1537…in Sublimus Dei…. “ whatever may have been or may be said to the contrary, the said Indians and all other people who may later be discovered by Christians, are by no means to be deprived of their liberty or the possession of their property”.
He would have helped the honesty of the Church history much more if he had named the four pro slavery Popes he was alluding to…which even Pope Leo XIII was oblivious of when he later did a short one sided history of the Church and slavery.
But no…every Pope is not sterling silver because other Popes were sterling silver.
Wuerl is one of Francis’ most loyal paladins. Has anyone else noticed that the allies of Francis, who has done more than any Pope since Leo X, to attack Church Tradition which is the basis for Papal authority in favor of some kind of synod-chaos, now demand obedience to the Pope. Bergoglio’s policies have trampled on Church thought and practice in so many ways (and the worst is coming with the Youth Synod)that they are impossible to defend as having continuity with other 20th/21st century Popes and Church Tradition. I’m sure Wuerl knows perfectly well that Humanae Vitae is in the cross hairs: it’s part of that moralism that “Youth” find so oppressive in the Church. If HV survives at all it will only be in the form of some kind of “ideal” which is unreachable by today’s Catholics and can be ignored after some discernment. What is striking about listening to men like Wuerl, Parolin or Cupich is how how vague and double handed are their arguments. Indeed there is a kind of “Francis-speak” that we find in the Church in which down means up: Orwell introduced us to it in 1984.
Pray for the Church.