Lincoln, Neb., Oct 11, 2018 / 04:30 pm (CNA).- The message of Humanae vitae is “good news” and a guide for rebuilding family and society Bishop James Wall of Gallup, New Mexico, has said. He made the remarks during a talk on the famous encyclical and the legacy of Pope Paul VI.
Humanae vitae presents a “blueprint” for a happy marriage, the bishop told listeners, and that ignoring it had led to the breakdown of the family seen in recent decades. Wall said the Church could not be silent about the lessons of the last fifty years, and what the Church had to teach about them.
“When we speak about human life, it means it’s addressed to everyone,” he said.
Wall delivered his talk, entitled Humanae vitae and the Wisdom of Pope Paul VI, Oct. 3 as part of an ongoing series organized by the Diocese of Lincoln.
“A society where contraceptive mentality is the norm, we know, is not a society based on love,” Wall said. “And we know that that will eventually implode on itself, because we know that that is a selfish society.”
Humanae vitae was promulgated July 25, 1968, by Blessed Pope Paul VI, who will be canonized in Rome Oct. 14.
The landmark encyclical was a central part of the Church’s response to the cultural changes in the West during the 1960s, and particularly the widespread liberalization of sexual mores. While it presented the Church’s consistent ethic of life and human sexuality, it has become most closely associated with its affirmation of the Church’s teaching against the use of artificial contraception.
Wall noted the many symptoms of cultural decline which had been foreseen by Pope Paul, including large increases in cohabitation, divorce, and infidelity, and underscored the fundamental damage done to relations between men and women over the last fifty years.
Men had been given license to use women to “feed their selfish pleasure,” he said, both in personal relationships but also across popular culture, most especially in the multi-billion dollar pornography industry.
“This one we have seen in spades, over and over and over again,” Wall said. “If I am looking at the other, who is created in the image and likeness of God…and I am looking at her and I see her as purely an object, then I am going to use her for my own selfish purpose, my own selfish reasons.”
Wall said that Humanae vitae was first and foremost “good news,” and the “remedy for us to help to overcome the culture of death.”
“This is really where we see the prophetic wisdom of Paul VI,” Wall said.
“When a couple is using contraception, it becomes the husband, the wife, and the pharmaceutical company,” he said. “And what we do when we include the pharmaceutical company is we push God out.”
Wall said during his time doing marriage prep as a parochial vicar, couples would often be reluctant to pray together, even if they were receiving the sacraments. He said he would teach the couples a simple form of prayer, in which one of the members of the couple prays for the intentions of the other, and vice versa. This helps to develop the “spiritual personalities” of a husband and wife, and makes prayer an integral part of marriage.
“The greatest way that a husband and wife can love their children is by first loving each other,” Wall told the audience. “Couples who are faithful to the Church’s teaching, couples that are faithful to their own vocation, it spills out onto their children, so their children have a greater understanding of discerning their own vocation.”
Paul VI wrote Humanae vitae following the so-called sexual revolution of the 1960s. The advent of oral contraceptives for women, ‘the pill,’ caused many to wonder if the Church would reconsider its traditional opposition to artificial contraception, even among married couples.
Paul VI established a commission, made up of both clergy and laypeople, to examine the issue.
The conclusion of many of the commission’s members was to recommend that the Church declare it licit for married Catholics to use contraception in some circumstances. Subsequent leaks to the press built pubic expectations of a change, Wall said.
Many were surprised by the eventual contents of the encyclical, which disappointed those who wanted to see the Church adapt to the morals of the era. But, Bishop Wall suggested, no other conclusion was possible for the pope since it would have meant leading the Church into error.
Wall reminded listeners that the authority Christ invested in the Church, and in the popes, protects the Church from error in the areas of faith and morals.
“It’s not the Church of St. Peter, it’s not the Church of the Apostles, it’s not your Church, it’s not my Church, but Jesus says this is my Church, I will establish my Church,” Wall said.
“And so no matter how dark or difficult things can become, we always want to make sure we remain in the Barque of St. Peter, that we remain in the Church that Jesus Christ founded.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
The Church has moral error at times. Pope Nicholas V and three succeeding Popes were all for perpetual slavery of newly discovered Indians who resisted the faith. Then Pope Paul III in 1537 reversed their written permissions to Portugal and Spain along those lines. Usury was a huge issue for centuries…now it makes a tiny appearance in Vat.II and the catechism because no one really knows for sure what it is. Vix Pervenit forbade the smallest interest on personal loans but in 1830 the Vatican permitted moderate interest on same which was Calvin’s position centuries prior. And of course in morals, now we have the capital punishment mistake (I’ll spare you) and fifty years of silence on wifely obedience in Vatican II, in pulpits and in the catechism. And then there is Amoris Laetitia. What can I say about it that has not already been said about hurricane Michael. Humanae Vitae was good but prophetic? No. No fault divorce combined with modern affluence combined with silence on wifely obedience was the another major force in divorce. Nineteenth century France had trouble with Catholic husbands using coitus interruptus and wives objecting to no avail but divorces didn’t happen because no fault divorce didn’t exist. If Paul VI was a prophet, how is it he didn’t predict the sex abuse scandal which was taking place during his reign in the largest numbers. He was Pope from 1963 to 1978…the peak years. He was not a prophet. He seemed so nice that let’s hope he really knew nothing about it…or he thought foolishly that silence and therapy were sufficient. Jail is sufficient not therapy. Morals are infallible when e.g. a Pope goes to the trouble to make that plain as St. John Paul II did three times in Evangelium Vitae on abortion, killing the innocent, and euthanasia wherein he polled all Bishops who agreed with him on those three and consequently he used a verbal formula similar to the Assumption encyclical but with slight differences. Prior…those three were condemned in the universal ordinary magisterium but the Pope saw that multitudes were not ranking that source of infallibility highly ever since the Assumption’s clarity.
The nonobservance of Humanae Vitae probably made JPII move abortion from the uom to a use of the extraordinary magisterium but he failed to advertise what he was doing and why. He should have. Did he poll the Bishops on contraception for that same encyclical? I’ll bet he did (the poll in detail probably falls under papal secret…70 years?) but did not get unanimity as he did on abortion. But then he should have used ex cathedra in which he does not need the Bishops. He did not.