I admit, the trailers for Toy Story 4 made me apprehensive when I saw them earlier this year. A Hollywood blockbuster about a plastic spork now living life as a child’s toy? It sounded like the perfect set up for a message about the joys of self-identifying as whatever you want to be, or some similar contemporary cultural cliche. That’s the last thing I wanted from such a brilliant movie franchise.
I should have had more faith in the geniuses at Pixar. Toy Story 4 turned out to be so contrary to my expectations that I was left wondering how the filmmakers managed to get such a traditional and wonderfully counter-cultural message past the various studio gatekeepers.
Here is why I will be picking up a copy for my family when it is released on video this week.
The Toy Story films have always been about the meaning of life. From the first appearance of Buzz Lightyear in the original movie, Woody and the gang have struggled to answer the big questions: What are we? Why are we here? How does it look to live out that truth?
In the first installment, for example, the story revolves around Woody’s attempt to convince Buzz that he is actually a child’s play character and not a real space ranger. Through a series of painful experiences, Buzz overcomes prideful and dangerous self-delusion, finally submitting himself to reality.
One of the main benefits of that, of course, was that Buzz’z life would now be safer. He had to realize that he couldn’t actually fly, that his lasers were really just light bulbs, and that his space suit wasn’t suited for space at all. To hang onto his previous false beliefs would ultimately get him destroyed.
But beyond just avoiding danger, submitting to the truth brought Buzz contentment and a whole new level of joy. That is because he was created for a purpose—to love and be loved by his child—and by conforming his beliefs and actions to that essential fact, Buzz found fulfillment in life. It turns out that his creator had a good plan for him, and conforming to that plan brought true happiness.
Toy Story 4 has a very similar narrative trajectory. This time, the character facing the existential crisis is Forky, a disposable hybrid utensil that was given sentient life when kindergarten-aged Bonnie formed it into her companion using glue, googly eyes, and some pipe cleaners. Unfortunately for Forky, he refuses to believe that he is a toy, created to love and be loved by Bonnie. Rather, he sees himself as trash, a cheap tool meant to be used once and thrown away.
Thankfully, just as he did with Buzz, Woody jumps in to try to convince Forky of the truth: that in his essence, Forky is a beloved toy. The main difference between Buzz and Forky is that Buzz had too high a view of himself, while Forky has too low a view. As such, instead of trying to keep Buzz from jumping off structures because he thinks he can fly, Woody tries to keep Forky from jumping off structures because he wants to “kill” himself and get back into a trashcan.
Watching Toy Story 4, I was struck by just how contrary it is to the prevailing cultural narrative. After all, who does Woody think he is, telling anyone else what their self-identity should be? Shouldn’t he be affirming them in whatever they believe? If Buzz thinks he’s a space ranger, then he is one! If Forky believes he is a disposable tool to be used for someone else’s pleasure, then no one has the right to step in and tell him different! Isn’t everything supposed to be up for grabs, with no boundaries but the confines of an individual’s naked will?
To suggest otherwise is to undermine almost everything about today’s post sexual revolution moral landscape. The entire edifice, from hook-up culture to gender identity chaos, is predicated on the idea that there is no creator, we do not have a nature or essence to which we must conform, and life has no meaning other than what we create for ourselves.
But not only do the writers of Toy Story suggest otherwise, they make a very compelling and powerful case that it is all bunk, and dangerous bunk at that. Through the lives of the toys, we see that believing lies about yourself and the meaning of life is a dead end, emotionally, relationally, even physically.
They also present a beautiful alternative, one that turns out to be the Catholic answer to life’s biggest question. Why are we here? Because our creator made us in his image, to love and be loved by him, and to love others in the same way.
How are we to do that? According to the dictates of our nature. Only by submitting to that reality, the details of which God has graciously revealed in Scripture and Church teaching, will we ever find contentment and true happiness.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Beautifully written, you summed up in a nutshell why these movies have me in tears feeling like such a sap everytime. They have such a beautiful message. Following your writings now.
This is a well articulated analysis of the B arc as sporky is not the lead protagonist. Woody’s arc is where the actual message was, and if your children love the first three films I implore you to think again about ever showing them this one.
Woody has been the torch bearer of the core TOY STORY theme “fulfillment of your design is the only way to be truly happy”. In the first it plays out through Buzz and also Woody accepting his new status for Andy’s sake (after all Woody is for Andy, and covetousness is selfish). In the second he’s reminded that toys are meant to be played with. They are to bring joy to children, not locked behind glass to be admired for their own sake. In the third he has to convince the gang that regardless of Andy’s growing up they belong to him. They are to be there for him regardless, and trust that he’ll do right by them (which he does). Now here in the fourth installment Woody is skipped on being played with 3 times which leads to a crisis. The internal stakes for Woody have nothing to do with Forky. They have everything to do with Bo Peep (that’s why the opening image related to her). Woody eventually abandons his purpose to follow Bo into wild world of “lost toys”. Toys who have abandoned their state in life and rejected their design. He rejects the theme of all three previous films to follow his passions. He abandons his lifelong friends and his KID.
This is what children who are fans of the franchise will walk away with. This is how subtle writing affects the culture. They are the seeds that sprout in the moral imagination as the child grows, abstractions that work themselves into all the little (and then bigger) practical decisions. Beware.
Bullocks.
I’m glad you find meaning in Toy Story 4, but don’t for one minute assume their motives. You are pulling the oldest religion mistake in the world which is assigning your beliefs to the world around you.
I don’t know the intentions of the writers of Toy Story. And neither do you. So don’t try to assign this religious meaning unless you know the writters and know their intentions.
Yes you might find purpose and meaning in the film, but don’t appropriate it in to your religious view. You make it sound like it’s an metaphor for God and his creations. If you see it as helpful fine. But don’t use it as a tool to denigrate folks who are LGBTQ +, which is what you are trying to do here.
“So don’t try to assign this religious meaning unless you know the writters and know their intentions.”
Translation: “Christian Fool, don’t thoughtfully consider and write about movies that I have already deigned to interpret as I wish.”
“But don’t use it as a tool to denigrate folks who are LGBTQ +, which is what you are trying to do here.”
Translation: “Christian Bigot, don’t you dare go against the Reign of Gay and the Tyranny of Trans. Otherwise, I’ll get huffy in your comboxes.”