Crookston, Minn., Nov 5, 2019 / 02:05 pm (CNA).- Depositions of Crookston Bishop Michael Hoeppner were released today, in which the bishop admits that he did not properly address an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor by a priest that an alleged victim brought to him in 2011. The depositions, released by attorney Jeff Anderson as part of a settlement agreement, also indicate that Hoeppner mishandled the cases of several priests, including one, presently in active ministry, who admitted to diocesan officials that he had sexually abused a 5-year-old while a teenager.
Hoeppner is the subject of a Vatican investigation into his administration of the Crookston diocese, conducted under the auspices of Vos estis lux mundi, 2018 norms from Pope Francis on investigating bishops accused of mishandling or obstructing allegations of clerical sexual abuse.
The first stage of the Vatican investigation was undertaken by Archbishop Bernard Hebda of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Sources close to the archbishop have told CNA that Hebda sent to Rome in late September his findings and recommendations in the case, and is now awaiting further instructions.
The findings of that Vatican investigation are not expected to be released before the U.S. bishops’ conference meets next week, and Hoeppner is expected to attend the meeting.
However, the released depositions reveal details about Hoeppner’s leadership of the diocese.
The released depositions and documents show that Rev. Joseph Richards, a current pastor and the diocesan judicial vicar, admitted to diocesan authorities that he had sexually abused a child when he was a teenager, suffers from “sexual compulsivity,” and that he has had sexual fantasies involving minors while in ministry as a priest.
Confronted with those facts in a 2018 deposition, Hoeppner said that he had felt no need to re-examine his decision to assign the priest to active ministry.
In August, Hoeppner acknowledged that Richards had disclosed abusing a child while a teenager, but said that “after his successful completion and discharge from treatment, and having benefitted from the help he received, Father Richards was returned to priestly ministry and has served admirably now and without incident for a total of 29 years.”
The depositions also demonstrate that Hoeppner did not exercise oversight of a priest accused of “boundary violations,” and judged by mental health professional to be at risk of further violations, whom the bishop placed into priestly ministry without notifying parishioners of allegations made against the priest. In the depositions, the bishop said he could not recall whether expert recommendations to prevent the priest from committing boundary had been followed.
That priest, Fr. Patrick Sullivan, was placed on “administrative leave” in 2019 after a new allegation of boundary violations was made against him, reportedly similar to the cases in which he had previously been accused.
An August statement acknowledged that Sullivan has been accused of abusing a child, but said that allegation was not substantiated. It did not address the priest’s reported history of grooming relationships.
Hoeppner was also in 2018 depositions asked about Fr. Don Braukmann, who died July 17, 2019. In 2014, the bishop had received complaints about the priest from the safe-environment coordinator in the Crookston diocese, who claimed that Braukmann had committed “as many as 15 to 20 code of conduct rules,” and had a questionable relationship with a young teenager.
While Braukmann was eventually sent for counseling and mental health treatment, the deposition suggests the bishop did not follow recommended protocols when the priest returned, and the priest reportedly resumed a grooming relationship with the teenager.
In the deposition, Hoeppner said he disputed the views of his own safe-environment coordinator and said he did not recall that treatment facility staff classified Braukmann as being at “high risk” of abusing and grooming minors.
The priest remained in ministry until shortly before his death.
Vasek spoke at a Nov. 5 press conference.
“I was abused. I reported, I was told to be silent. I was coerced. I have been lied to, and I gave up my diaconate to tell the truth,” he said.
“It’s disturbing to see the Bishop of Crookston act like that.”
Vasek added that before the press conference, he had read depositions of both Hoeppner and the diocesan vicar general, Msgr. Michael Foltz.
“I had read their depositions and saw the blatant lies and the misuses of trust and power these men had perpetrated. As I read them, I was sickened, as I hope you will be at the dishonesty of these men. The depositions will speak for themselves. These men will be caught in their own lies. Shame on you. You have betrayed our Lord,” Vasek added.
Vasek claimed initially that Monsignor Roger Grundhaus, a priest of the Diocese of Crookston, sexually assaulted him in a hotel room in approximately 1971 while the two of them were at a canon law convention in Columbus, Ohio.
An August statement of the diocese disputes that account, saying there was not canon law convention in Columbus that year, while Vasek was a minor.
In fact, the alleged abuse took place during the Midwest Regional Canon Law Convention in April 1972, shortly after Vasek had turned 17. According to the canon law in place at the time, the alleged assualt did not constitute the abuse of a minor.
The discrepency of dates seems to have led the diocese to return Grundhaus to ministry without notation of the allegation against him.
But in his deposition, Hoeppner admitted that at the time the abuse was reported to him, before he was aware of the details, he did not order an investigation into the allegation.
In his deposition, Hoeppner testified that Vasek came to him in September 2011 to report the abuse. The bishop alleges that he asked Vasek if he wanted it to be made public, and Vasek said “absolutely not.”
Canon law requires a bishop to investigate all allegations of sexual abuse of minors, and to involve the diocesan review board, regardless of whether the alleged victim asks for an investigation. Hoeppner said he did initially not do that because Vasek wanted the allegation to remain “confidential.”
Hoeppner admitted in the deposition he understood himself to violating Church norms, but said he did so to maintain confidentiality. It is not clear whether the bishop also violated Minnesota statutes regarding the mandatory reporting of child abuse.
In addition to the bishop’s failure to properly handle the allegation of abuse, Vasek alleges, Hoeppner coerced him into recanting his claim.
The bishop called Vasek to his residence a meeting in Oct. 2015, shortly before Vasek was scheduled to be ordained a deacon.
Vasek claims Hoeppner at that meeting ordered him to sign a letter, printed on diocesan stationary, recanting his allegations against Grundhaus.
The letter read: “I, Ron Vasek, regarding a trip I was on when I was 16 years old, and on which a priest of the Diocese of Crookston was also participating, clearly and freely state that I have no desire to nor do I make any accusation of sexual impropriety by the priest toward me.”
Hoeppner explained that the Fargo diocese had inquired about Vasek’s allegation against Grundhaus, and intended to forbid the priest from exercising ministry within its territory, Vasek told CNA last year.
“We want to have Grundhaus be able to do ministry,” Vasek said Hoeppner told him, “so we need to have you sign a letter recanting your allegation.”
Vasek said that also Hoeppner asked him, “If news of the scandal of Grundhaus gets out, how could I ordain you? Who would want you? Where would I put you? And besides, it would be very difficult on your son.”
Feeling coerced into doing so, Vasek signed the letter.
A priest in the Crookston diocese told CNA he believes Hoeppner coerced Vasek into recanting his claim against Grundhaus so that the priest would not need to included on a court-ordered list of alleged to have abused children prior to 1985.
Hoeppner said in his deposition that he during the meeting he offered to let Vasek put down his accusation in writing for the vicar general, but denies the claim that Vasek was being coerced.
The bishop also testified that he didn’t have the letter prepared in advance, but rather he had Vasek come back the next morning to sign it. He admitted that it was his idea to have Vasek sign the letter, and claimed that he didn’t save the file for the letter on his computer because it was “confidential.” He then, when shown a copy of the letter, claimed that he had Vasek backdate it for the previous day because that was the date they allegedly had their meeting.
He testified that he left Grundhaus’ name off the list of accused priests because, in his mind, no accusation had yet been brought forth— the accusation he had heard from Vasek in 2011 was still “confidential,” he said.
He added that he didn’t have the court order in mind “at all” when he met with Vasek in Oct. 2015.
During the Nov. 5 press conference, attorney Jeff Anderson called for the removal of Hoeppner from his post as Bishop of Crookston.
In a Nov. 5 statement, the diocese said that Hoeppner has “fully cooperated” with the canonical investigation into his leadership, and with the conditions of its recent legal settlements.
Regarding the investigation, the diocese said that “we await a response and remain hopeful that justice will prevail for all impacted by this action.”
In July, after a legal settlement was reached, Hoeppner offered another statement.
“To all victims and survivors of sexual abuse by clergy, as the Bishop of Crookston I apologize for the harm done to you by those entrusted with your spiritual care. Although you can never be fully compensated for your suffering, we are thankful this litigation has now come to a good end and are hopeful this settlement offers you justice and will be helpful for healing.”
For his part, Vasek called for broader reforms.
“There is a huge problem in the Church. Active homosexual activity by priests and the secrecy of this sin must be revealed, and the holy priesthood must be restored to what Jesus said it ought to be,” Vasek said.
“The dark secret coverup of homosexual behavior has been under the radar for many years. Now the darkness is coming to light,” he added.
Vasek also discussed the effects of the abuse he suffered.
For a long time, he said, “I was suffering from the disordered belief that it was my fault, what happened.” That belief led Vasek to struggles with alcohol and confusion about his own sexuality, and even to have insecurities about caring for his children.
“Not understanding the effects of my abuse prevented me from becoming the father I should have been.”
While Vasek promised prayers for his abuser and his bishop, he also had a message for them.
“To the priests who have caused this: shame on you.”
“All of you priests, bishops, and cardinals who have forgotten your sacred vows, and allowed this abuse to continue: shame on you.”
This story is developing and will be updated.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Unbelievable, but the good news is there was no mention of Pachamama in this story.
Now that the Amazonian Synod is over, it will be interesting to see what comes out of the USCCB meeting next week. Perhaps a
new Diocesan Climate Change collection at Mass to fund the local Bishop’s solar panels and Tesla or, following Pope Francis’ lead, Pachamama venerations at all churches with replicas and a sign that reads, “Pachamama I trust in you” (in English and Spanish).
Thanks for making me laugh after reading yet another sad story. But the most humorous things are those that most closely follow reality, so I wouldn’t put it past the USCCB to institute another second collection to help prevent climate change. All I can do is pray that God clean up this horrible mess that the infiltration of homosexuality has caused in the Church and, actually, in the world.
I note that Archbishop Hebda is ‘awaiting instructions ‘ from Rome. Wonder what those ‘instructions ‘ will be? Maybe Pope Francis will appoint Hoeppner to the next Synod, to stand next to him on the balcony and wave at us.
“The Bishop admitted that he did not properly address an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor …..”
And a few more young men who were considering the Priesthood turn away.
And more and more lukewarm Catholics turn away.
And people who were considering converting to the true Faith see this and turn away.
Terence, Our Lord does not step in at the eleventh hour, but the twelfth. He rose, not when He was dying, but when He had been dead three days.
This story, the gatekeepers of the seminaries turning faithful priests away, is more of the past, detailed by Michael Rose in ‘Goodbye Good Men’. These seminaries were enabled to distort the message of Christ by the relaxation permitted by Vatican II (as it was applied, at least). Homosexual networks arose and operated and we see the fruits now. The level of abuse that occurred had to have complicity at the top of the hierarchy, either overtly or by a failure to prosecute and eradicate. We are seeing more of the same in Rome. The top hierarchy who do not prosecute or eradicate use technicalities as excuses or feigned sympathy/empathy, but they are facilitators and enablers, either because they are part of the abuse, or they are compromised in some way. The good thing is that there is a light shining into it and those who are the problem are being exposed. The bad side is that they are not being prosecuted or eradicated in Rome, but despite Rome. But that is ok too, as that means we have their measure too.
There is no discipline within the Catholic Church. No spiritual, no personal, no theological and certainly no fiscal discipline among our bishops and many of our priests.
Nobody cares. Preach what you want, sleep with whom you want, worship some wooden idol from the jungle. Go for it. Nobody cares. Least of all the bishop of Rome and his cohorts.
“complicity at the top of the hierarchy”. “We are seeing more of the same in Rome.” “The bad side is that they are not being prosecuted or eradicated IN (em) Rome but DESPITE (em) Rome.” Sadly, all true.
History teaches that reform in the Church starts with the laity, and with each story of cover-ups, etc. by the Bishops, etc. the need for reform becomes ever more apparent – the Church hierarchy has shown us that they can no longer be trusted. And they either haven’t figured that out yet or they are covering up the fact that they know that. Which of the two is worse? I don’t know.
It starts with us – it starts with fasting and prayer.
This is such a sad story of continually ignoring and covering up sins of the priests. With such a long trail of evidence, this bishop should be removed. I wish every priest and every seminarian would need to read “The Priest We Need to Save the Church”, the just released book that is a powerful plea to all priests. I highly recommend it to the laity with the hope they will also buy copies for their priests and get them into seminaries. https://www.sophiainstitute.com/products/item/the-priests-we-need-to-save-the-church