CNA Staff, Jun 19, 2020 / 03:00 pm (CNA).- After an Arizona bishop expressed concern about political organizations engaging with local parishes, the leader of one such group said some perceptions about his organization do not square with the facts.
Bishop Edward Weisenburger wrote to priests of the Tucson diocese earlier this month, reflecting on the upcoming election season.
The bishop’s email, obtained by CNA, said that two pastors in the diocese had been approached by local members of a Wisconsin-based group called CatholicVote. They reportedly “wanted to connect with the parish and/or local Councils of the Knights of the Columbus.”
No political organization, the bishop said, can “be allowed to meet or advertise on parish property. Likewise, they may not share their communications through any parish or Catholic-sponsored entities in the Diocese of Tucson.”
“In short,” political organizations “may not be on our property,” Weisenburger wrote.
A representative of Weisenburger’s office confirmed the email to CNA, but declined to answer further questions.
Brian Burch, CatholicVote president, told CNA he respects Weisenburger’s concerns and decision. But in Arizona, he said, there might have been some misunderstanding about his organization’s work.
“Our program does not include any activities on church property or the use of church resources,” he said.
Burch said it his organization has “thousands of volunteers” and it is possible that some “may indeed have contacted their local pastor or parish priest in order to solicit their participation in encouraging Catholics in their parish to register to vote, or to vote.”
“However, there has never been any directive or recommendation that volunteers request or seek parish data files or lists — or that they engage in any partisan activity on parish property, or with parish staff,” he added.
“Our program is designed to operate entirely as a lay-organized effort, independent of church property and resources, and without the participation of pastors, priests, or diocesan staff.”
“We understand many bishops and pastors have concerns over the prohibition of political activities by tax-exempt entities, and we respect their concerns. They have nothing to fear from our work,” Burch said.
CatholicVote is organized as a lobbying organization and both a related political action committee and 501(c)(3) non-profit. Burch told CNA the group aims “to achieve historic turnout among Catholics in the upcoming November election.”
In particular, Burch said, the group is “focused on turning out every active (practicing) Catholic voter.”
CatholicVote says it is non-partisan and aims to encourage voter registration and voting among practicing Catholics.
“These voters, according to polling, are likely to vote for pro-life candidates, which no doubt frustrates some so-called progressives,” Burch told CNA.
Still, the group’s own platform is not completely aligned with either major party platform.
On its website, a section entitled “what we believe” notes the importance of “a culture that celebrates life,” says that “marriage is between one mane and one woman,” notes that “we are all called to help the poor,” calls for environmental stewardship, and adds that says that “the death penalty is an unnecessary legal penalty in the developed world.”
The group, however, in Facebook and web posts, regularly promotes decisions or policies of President Donald Trump and other Republican lawmakers, and regularly criticizes Democratic lawmakers.
CatholicVote has run social media posts and spoken in favor of Democratic Congressman Dan Lipinski, regarded as one of the last pro-life Democrats in Congress.
And while the group has sometimes been characterized as a Trump campaign operation, Burch said that’s not accurate.
In a 2016 column, Burch explained that “CatholicVote members have been clear: secure as many commitments from Trump as possible” on issues that matter to Catholics.
“If he has any hope of getting elected, he needs our votes, and we must work constructively in a very imperfect situation to advance our ideals as best as we can.”
As to 2020, Burch said CatholicVote will likely offer an endorsement, but it hasn’t yet.
“As of today Catholic Vote has not yet formally endorsed a candidate for 2020. As you know we did not endorse Donald Trump (nor Hillary) in 2016. We have however been very outspoken supporters of Trump policies, and critics of Biden. It’s fair to presume that we likely will endorse the President soon, even if some of our programs, especially our field efforts, continue to focus exclusively on turnout.”
Some aspects of the group’s efforts, like mobile targeting initiatives that allowed CatholicVote to target ads to mobile users who had attended a church in the months prior, have been criticized in Catholic circles. Mobile targeting technology has become commonplace in modern political advocacy, but some Catholics criticized it as invasive.
Burch has said technology is a way of helping Catholics get organized, and helping pro-life advocates compete in political races.
“Our priority now is reaching out and encouraging as many Catholic voters as possible to vote,” he told CNA.
The CatholicVote leader told CNA that the organization’s mission is appropriate to the vocation of lay Catholics.
“Politics is the responsibility of the laity. We have always honored and will continue to respect the limits of what churches and priests are permitted to do under existing law. While church officials cannot engage in certain political activities, there are no such restrictions for lay Catholics operating outside of Church property,” Burch said.
“We do not operate as an organization claiming to authoritatively teach the Faith. We have never claimed to speak on behalf of any bishop or the United States Conference of Bishops and explicitly disclaim any such role. Our work is focused on public policy and law, and encouraging Catholics to live out their Faith in public life,” he said.
In his email to priests, Weisenburger criticized CatholicVote’s name, noting “it is against canon law to use the word ‘Catholic’ in an organization that is not sponsored by the Church.”
The bishop’s remark apparently is a reference to canon 300, which deals with associations erected under the auspices of canon law. Of those groups, the canon says that “No association is to assume the name Catholic without the consent of competent ecclesiastical authority.”
Burch told CNA that “we have consulted canonists on the question of our name, and there is a diversity of opinion as to whether the particular canon even applies.”
“There are hundreds of organizations that use the name ‘Catholic’ in their work without formal approval, including some like the National Catholic Reporter who have been explicitly told to cease using the name but chose instead to ignore it,” Burch added. In 1968, the National Catholic Reporter was directed by Bishop Charles Helmsing of Kansas City to remove the word ‘Catholic’ from its name, and did not comply.
In any case, Burch said that CatholicVote has made efforts to work with bishops, and build relationships with them.
“When we incorporated in Madison, Wisconsin, we met personally with the Bishop and presented our mission and work. He was careful to distinguish between our unique role as laypersons and his leadership as bishop. He wanted to ensure that our work was faithful to church teaching and that we make clear that we were not speaking in his name or any other bishop. He approved of our work admitting that the need for formal canonical approval was uncertain. We have never published or advocated anything that we understand to be in violation of the teachings of the Church. If anyone can show me otherwise, we’d be happy to correct the error,” Burch told CNA.
While Burch told CNA he understands there have been misperceptions about CatholicVote’s work, “there is no confusion among anyone that has actually spoken with us. Unfortunately, in some cases, false information has been spread to try and harm our efforts. We would hope that those who have concerns about our work would seek understanding first.”
Burch also told CNA that ahead of a contentious election year, he hopes more clerics will also encourage lay political activity.
“I believe it is not only appropriate, but essential that pastors and priests encourage their parishioners to register and to vote. According to our research, as much as 30% or more of most parishes include voters that are not registered, or are infrequent voters. Given the stakes of this election, every pastor in America should be preaching on the importance of Catholic participation in our electoral process,” Burch said.
“You don’t need to be partisan, or endorse any candidates, to remind Catholics of this moral duty,” he added.
“With the likelihood of many parishes and schools closing, our charities under attack, our social service programs being shut down, and public policies that take direct aim at the Church itself, you would think our bishops and priests might muster the courage to at least ask people to vote?”
Weisenburger himself has a record of encouraging Catholics to vote, and offering guidance for the voting booth.
In a video released ahead of the 2016 election, the bishop told Catholics it is “essential that we have judges who respect the right to life and marriage as a covenant between one man and one woman, and who will protect religious freedom and rights of conscience.”
In his 2020 email to priests, Weisenburger affirmed his committment to forming Catholics to vote.
“Our task as ministers of the Gospel is to preach the Gospel and the values that flow from it. Many of our Church’s teachings on ethics, morality, and justice pertain to the common good and therefore are rightly known as political issues. It is our task to speak to the issues and thus to help form correctly the conscience of our people. Likewise, we are to urge them to appropriate political involvement and especially to exercise their right to vote. Experience has taught that we are quite capable of influencing the common good by influencing the conscience of our people. This does not require us to take a partisan stand,” the bishop wrote.
[…]
I’ve seen that statues of folks of African and Caribbean ancestry are being
vandalized here and in the UK.
It’s become a free for all.
They vandalized the monument to the 54th Massachusetts Regiment and their colonel, Robert Gould Shaw. The 54th was a black regiment during the Civil War. Gould and many of his men died together in battle. The movie “Glory” was based on their story.
Then of course there’s the statue of Robert the Bruce, in Scotland, defaced with painted signs calling him a racist king. Since he lived in the early 1300’s, I’m not entirely sure against whom he was supposed to be racist.
The rioters are not rioting because of any alleged racism or because of principles. They are unprincipled and delight in destruction.
And the “peaceful protesters” did everything but issue them engraved invitations.
There are no “peaceful protesters.” Forget George Floyd, The whole point of these protests is to overthrow, and destroy, United States history. They are proving to us that they (the Left ) can spit in our faces, and do whatever they want, because they have all the power.
They have the power to define who is good, and should be allowed to survive their destruction of history.. Isn’t it interesting that the statue of V.I. Lenin.—murderer of (an estimated) 25 million Russian (and other) people and the creator of the Communist Gulag system of slave labor—still stands in the city’s Fremont neighborhood.
Apparently, there’s no danger of Vladimir’s statue being torn down. Obviously, what Vladimir stands for in history is good. Theodore Roosevelt, or U.S. Grant are bad.
Where are the Bishops and priests and religious protecting their flock from the coming of The NAZI hordes to the U.S.? I’ll tel you what I think: They’re hiding out, and silent, because they’re not sure of their own righteousness. They are as lost as our,political leaders are lost.
The horde will come for them, and our churches, and, finally, us. Then, I suppose, they’ll tell us to sacrifice ourselves for the sins of…of whom? Our forefathers? European history? The world? Instead of criticizing the horde destroying a point of our history, and one of their churches, our religious leaders criticize the only political leader we have who made any kind of an attempt to express the righteousness of Christianity, Western Civilization, and the United States. Him they denigrate.
Our leaders, religious and political, are suicidal—and they have made most of their flock as suicidal as they are.
Antifa and BLM are nothing but terrorists and braindead leftist mobs (which is what BLM stands for BTW). Shut them down.
Some questions – What does Nancy Pelosi have to say about these incidents? Joe Biden?
More important – Will anyone in the MSM even ASK them?
Albert Mohler: Black lives matter, the sentence, yes; Black Lives Matter, the movement, no.
It can hardly be a surprise to the people starting the “important protests” that their protests were hijacked by mobs bent on violence, considering that it happens over and over and over. They are making themselves complicit in the violence by allowing themselves to be used.
“They are making themselves complicit in the violence by allowing themselves to be used”.
Amen.
Has anybody bothered to read the BLM manifesto?
They’ve memory-holed their demands, as far as I can tell, but here’s their original list of demands: https://web.archive.org/web/20160802135527/https://policy.m4bl.org/platform/
To hear them and some braindeads tell it, the mobs of history have such a special past where they have been so beneficial to us all and brought about true change. What fairy tail have they been reading?? (pun intended) The 2nd best thing the Missions and Saints like Serra did, was prepare a unsuspecting native population to the fact that Europe was coming and help them have the skills and language to meet it. We cannot change the way history unfolded. Gratitude is always the best route. Liberals want us to be blank with no history so that they can tell us who we are. Sorry God has already told me who I am. I’m not buying what they are selling or bowing to their God.
BLM demands per link above – this list seems to be truncated, no mention of their anti-family position.
I’ll go back to the article by Al Mohler (Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) – “Black Lives Matter: Affirm the Sentence, Not the Movement”, in Public Discourse, June 18.