A Catholic guide to March Madness 2021

By Christine Rousselle for CNA

March 17, 2021 CNA Daily News News Briefs 0 Print

Celebration parade for 2016 Villanova men’s championship basketball team Credit: Kelleher Photography/Shutterstock

Washington D.C., Mar 17, 2021 / 04:00 am (CNA).- Last year, the official NCAA Basketball tournament–”March Madness”–was canceled and replaced by a decidedly less fun March “madness” of shopping for toilet paper, hand sanitizer, and other pandemic supplies.

But the real March Madness is back–finally. And while the tournament looks slightly different this year–all games are taking place in Indiana with limited fan attendance–CNA is once again providing its annual look at all of the Catholic colleges and universities among the 68 teams vying for the championship. This year’s bracket features eight Catholic schools.

So if your alma mater was not selected for this year’s tournament, or if you’re looking for a bandwagon to hop on for the next few weeks, read on. The tournament begins on Thursday with the “First Four” set of play-in games. On Friday, the first round kicks off, so get those brackets in quickly.

CNA makes no guarantee about the accuracy of these predictions. Fill out a bracket at your own risk. 

 

West Region: 

(1) Gonzaga University

Catholic affiliation: Society of Jesus (Jesuits)

Nickname: Bulldogs

Conference: West Coast Conference

Star players: Corey Kispert, Drew Timme, Jalen Suggs

Tournament outlook: Gonzaga is the top overall seed, and they’re entering the tournament undefeated. While this is an impressive accomplishment, a record like that places a massive target on their backs. An undefeated team has not won the tournament since Bobby Knight’s Indiana Hoosiers squad in 1976. Gonzaga has consistently performed well in the tournament–finishing second overall in 2017 and making an “Elite Eight” appearance in 2019–but they have never won a championship. This might be the year that their luck changes, however. Their journey to a title kicks off on Saturday against the winner of Thursday’s play-in contest between Norfolk State and Appalachian State.

 

(5) Creighton University

Catholic affiliation: Society of Jesus (Jesuits)

Nickname: Bluejays

Conference: Big East

Star players: Marcus Zegarowski, Denzel Mahoney, Christian Bishop

Tournament outlook: Creighton had a decent regular season, but the Bluejays were demolished by Georgetown in the Big East Tournament final. Obviously, that blowout loss is not the momentum they would want to be taking to Indianapolis, and they will have to shake off the cobwebs by the time they tip off against UC Santa Barbara on March 20. A lot of people have this game pegged as a potential first-round upset, so Creighton needs to show up in a big way.

 

East Region: 

(9) St. Bonaventure University

Catholic affiliation: Order of Friars Minor (Franciscans)

Nickname: Bonnies

Conference: Atlantic 10

Star players: Kyle Lofton, Osun Osunniyi, Dominick Welch

Tournament outlook: The Bonnies have two paths: they will either become this year’s “Cinderella” and overperform, or they will exit the first round “one-and-done”–again. The last time St. Bonaventure won a first round game was in 1970–their 2018 victory against UCLA came in a play-in game. St. Bonaventure is a decent team with a lot of potential. The Bonnies will face off against Louisiana State University on March 20.

(12) Georgetown University

Catholic affiliation: Society of Jesus (Jesuits)

Nickname: Hoyas

Conference: Big East

Star players: Qudus Wahab, Jahvon Blair, Chudier Bile

Tournament outlook: Welcome back, Georgetown. A former perennial powerhouse, the Hoyas have appeared rather like runts of the litter for the past few seasons. After a huge upset win over Creighton in the Big East final, which followed other upset wins over both Villanova and Seton Hall, Georgetown punched its ticket back to the “Big Dance.” Former Georgetown star Patrick Ewing took the reigns as head coach in 2017, and it appears as though things have finally hit their stride in his tenure. The 12-seed vs. 5-seed games are always a bit tricky to predict, and Georgetown faces off against CU Boulder on Saturday. Could they be this year’s Cinderella story? The pieces are certainly in place for it to happen.

 

(15) Iona College

Catholic affiliation: Congregation of Christian Brothers

Nickname: Gaels

Conference: Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference (MAAC)

Star players:  Asante Gist, Isaiah Ross, Berrick JeanLouis.

Tournament outlook: Iona has the unfortunate spot of playing one of the hottest teams in the country, Alabama, in the first round. They have the good fortune, however, of being coached by Rick Pitino–a coach who certainly knows how to win games when it matters. The Gaels have made the tournament every year since 2016, but haven’t won a game in that time.

 

(16) Mount St. Mary’s University

Catholic affiliation: Independent

Nickname: Mountaineers

Conference: Northeast Conference

Star players: Damian Chong Qui, Nana Opoku, Malik Jefferson

Tournament outlook: The Mountaineers are back in the tournament for the first time since 2017, with a play-in game on Thursday against Texas Southern University. If they win that game, they will face off against top-ranked Michigan. A 16 seed has only beaten a 1 seed once in the tournament’s history, but everything is quite unpredictable this year.

 

South Region:

(5) Villanova University

Catholic affiliation: Order of St. Augustine (Augustinian)

Nickname: Wildcats

Conference: Big East

Star players: Jeremiah Robinson-Earl, Justin Moore, Jermaine Samuels

Tournament outlook: Villanova has their work cut out for them, with one of their star players injured and out for the season. This certainly affected their relatively anemic performances during the last week of the season and in the Big East Tournament. It’s a shame, as a healthy Villanova could have gone on quite the run through the tournament.

 

Midwest Region:

(8) Loyola University Chicago

Catholic affiliation: Society of Jesus (Jesuits)

Nickname: Ramblers

Conference: Missouri Valley Conference

Star players: Cameron Krutwig, Lucas Williamson, Braden Norris

Tournament outlook: The darlings of the 2018 tournament, who made it to the Final Four as an 11-seed while playing in their first tournament since 1963, are back again. At first, it was questionable if their 101-year-old chaplain Sr. Jean Schmidt, a bona fide basketball celebrity herself, would be permitted to take the trip to Indianapolis. After not being permitted to travel to the team’s conference tournament in St. Louis, Sister Jean–the breakout star of the 2018 tournament–was reportedly “so mad” at this decision. She’s now fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. On Tuesday she received permission from the NCAA to join her team for the tournament, with the condition that she not run down on the court, and that she follows all rules. Can lightning strike twice for the Ramblers? We’ll find out when they face off against Georgia Tech on Friday.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

Related Articles

No Picture
News Briefs

California voters must reject ‘no limit’ Proposition 1 abortion amendment, critics say

October 6, 2022 Catholic News Agency 0
Participants in a demonstration against Proposition 1 outside the California capitol in Sacramento, Oct. 6, 2022. / Photo courtesy of California’s No on Prop. 1 Campaign

Denver Newsroom, Oct 6, 2022 / 17:02 pm (CNA).

Unlimited abortion would become a fundamental right, as would abortion on viable unborn children, if voters pass the proposed California ballot measure Proposition 1, a broad coalition has warned.

“The proposed amendment to the state constitution has no language on limits and no recognition of the viability of the infant and late-term pregnancies,” Bishop Jaime Soto of Sacramento said at an Oct. 6 press conference outside the capitol in Sacramento.

He said Proposition 1 seeks to make abortion a “fundamental right” in California while “removing any common-sense limits on late-term abortions.”

The California Together, No On Proposition 1 press conference drew speakers from various political and religious backgrounds, including Catholics, Evangelicals, Muslims, and backers and foes of legal abortion.

Bishop Soto said Prop. 1 is “an unneeded, radical and expensive proposition.” He invoked Pope Francis’ rejection of a “throwaway culture,” saying “the leaders of a ‘throwaway society’ are trying to impose an expensive ideology on California.”

The proposed amendment, titled “Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom,” was placed on the November ballot by the state legislature, with support from abortion provider Planned Parenthood. Amendment backers anticipated the U.S. Supreme Court’s June decision overturning the pro-abortion rights Roe v. Wade decision.

The text of Proposition 1 reads, in part: “The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives.”

Critics emphasized the proposed amendment’s lack of limits on legal abortion.

“We are here to say that Prop. 1 is extreme, expensive and unnecessary.” Catherine Hadro, media director of California Together, No on Proposition 1 said Wednesday. “We all know that Prop 1. means late-term abortion in California up until the moment of birth, even if both mother and baby are healthy. And we all agree that that is too extreme. That is why we are coming together to stop Prop. 1.”

According to Hadro, only 13% of Californians support unrestricted legal abortion. The proposition’s creators left out viability language “on purpose,” she said. She encouraged voters to read the ballot measure and take note that viability language is missing.

“Proposition 1 means post-viability, late-term abortion without limit paid for by your taxpayer dollars,” she said.

When the California legislature debated the proposal, lawmakers asked whether it would allow abortion past viability, when an unborn child can survive outside the womb. A promised answer never came.

Dr. Pratima Gupta, a San Diego obstetrician-gynecologist involved in drafting the law, told the Northern California radio station KQED that drafters deliberately excluded the word “viability.” He said every pregnancy is “individual” and a “continuum.” The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, a generally pro-abortion rights organization, removed the term “viability” from its guidance on abortion in May.

Speakers at Thursday’s press conference included Democrats for Life communications director Jess Meeth, Democrat attorney Christopher Bakes, International Faith Based Coalition president Tak Allen, and Tarbiya Institute representative Mashal Ayobi. They were joined by California Family Council communications coordinator Sophia Lorey and Traditional Values for Next Generations founder Sarah Kim.

“Together with our partners here around this podium we see the illogic, the imprudence and the danger of Proposition 1,” said Bishop Soto. “We have been companions for women who find themselves alone and unsupported. This mission will continue. Say ‘no’ to Prop. 1 and let us offer better alternatives to women and children.”

Ann Stone, Republicans for Choice founder and national chairman, said Prop. 1 is “a sloppy over-reach by the pro-choice side.”

“It doesn’t codify Roe. It goes beyond. Badly beyond,” she said.

One speaker delivered remarks on behalf of Kristin Turner, executive director of Pro-life San Francisco and a self-identified progressive vegan atheist. Turner said the proposal is “an extreme violation of human rights” and contradicts what Californians know about the humanity of the unborn child.  

“The majority of us can see that at seven, eight, nine months old, that is clearly a baby,” she said. Turner advocated that California direct money to better causes, like reducing maternal mortality, which especially affects Black women.

Dr. Vansen Wong, an obstetrician-gynecologist, is among the critics of the measure. He performed hundreds of abortions, before he rejected the procedure as morally wrong.

Wong warned of the medical problems that abortion can cause after 21 weeks. Women who have late-term abortions face a greater risk of pre-term delivery in future pregnancies and are at greater risk of delivering babies with no hope of survival. Women who have late-term abortions face greater mental health risks including anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation.

Bishop Soto said that October is “a time to renew our commitment to pray, advocate and do works of mercy promoting the dignity of human life.”

“For almost 50 years the Catholic community has been an alternative voice of reason protecting the dignity of human life in the womb,” he said.

“We are here to present a different vision and offer the hopes of a better California,” said the bishop. “The gospel of Jesus gives life and hope to all. Like the first disciples of Jesus, we are fortunate to have been chosen, to be messengers of a life-changing, life-giving gospel in a time of great change and turmoil in California.” 

Foes of the measure must work to sway voters. Though an August poll from Rasmussen Reports indicated that only 13% of California voters support abortion through the third trimester, an August survey from the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies said that 71% of the state’s voters would vote in favor of Prop. 1.

[…]

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*