On March 20, 2021, some 10,000 people engaged in a London rally protesting the severe COVID lockdowns of schools, businesses, restaurants, bars, and even playgrounds. I was particularly struck by a sign carried by a woman that read “Stop Harming Our Children”.
As a busy psychiatrist who has been hearing of growing numbers of adolescent suicides from acquaintances of patients and friends, the extent of this reality was brought home by a March 25, 2021 report from Boston Children’s Hospital. It states that between July and October of last year there was a 47% increase, over the same time period the year before, in adolescents needing to be hospitalized for suicidal ideation and attempts.
In an All Things Considered interview cited in the report, Dr. Elizabeth Pinsky, pediatric psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital, stated:
You think about the young people you know who are going through the process that is completely normal and very important, of separating from their families and developing and identity outside of that…Those identities are an athlete, an actress, a friend, a person out in the community. And we have taken those things away from these kids in a way (that) really attacks the things that makes kids really healthy. We know that kids who are committed to sports, who have activities, who sort of have good peer groups, do better. The losses that adolescents, in particular, are, experiencing around identity and around who they are in the world, I think is one of the reasons that we’re seeing an uptick in self-harm.
She went on to state, “It does feel that we are perhaps shifting to a new phase in the pandemic now, and that we may be moving on from sort of the darkest days in terms of isolation for children and some of the things that were hitting kids the hardest. And so I hope that some of that hope can roll down from grown-up onto children over the coming months.”
This research is consistent with the experience of too many families whose children have committed suicide because of the severe increase in isolation and loneliness in their lives as direct result of the COVID-19 guidelines. These guidelines have undermined the ability of adolescents to maintain a healthy identity through essential activities related to good friendships, sports, acting, musical performances, and community involvement.
COVID guidelines which have insisted that masks and the closing of schools are necessary to protect youth have been disproved by Jonas Ludvigsson, a Swedish professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. His research was peer reviewed and published in a letter (“Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden”) in the March 2021 edition the New England Journal of Medicine.
Ludvigsson studied children from the ages of 1 to 16 during the first wave of the pandemic last spring. The children studied were not wearing face masks. Only 15 children went to the ICU—a rate of 0.77 per 100,000, according to the report. Four had “an underlying chronic coexisting condition” and “No child with Covid-19 died.” As far as teachers, “fewer than” 30 ended up in the ICU during the same period, which is a rate of about 19 per 100,000.
Many have been dismissive or even antagonistic toward Ludvigsson’s study and findings. He stated in a recent New York Post article that said he lost sleep as a result of the “angry messages through social media and email” assailing his study. The Post piece noted that “due to the backlash Ludvigsson faced over his research, Sweden plans to boost academic freedom protections in law…”
In short, Ludvigsson’s study disproves school closings based on youth testing positive for COVID or having mild COVID symptoms. The forced isolation of adolescents through COVID guidelines should be withdrawn immediately as a national policy to protect our youth from the severe epidemic of suicide that is far more dangerous to youth than is COVID.
Over the ten year period from 2007 to 2017 the suicide rate among people ages 10 to 24 years old climbed 56%. Obviously, numerous factors were already contributing to this marked increase in vulnerability in youth to suicide.
Genesis 2 recounts that God, having placed Adam in the Garden of Eden, stated, “It is not good for man to be alone; I will make a helpmate suitable for him” (Gen 2:18). While this passage is normally applied to marriage, it offers a path for those who struggle with intense loneliness at every life stage. Youth need helpmates in numerous activities in order to build confidence and hope. The effects of intense loneliness are often denied for long periods of time—only to have them emerge later as severe depression, hopelessness, and thoughts of suicide.
Those who created the COVID guidelines misrepresented the risks of COVID and denied the psychological science that so clearly identifies the need for secure attachment relationships with other adolescents to maintain psychological health.
A November 2018 Harvard University study of over 5,000 adolescents, who were followed for more than eight years (and controlled for many other variables), showed that those adolescents who were attended at least weekly religious services and who prayed regularly—compared with those who never attended religious services—demonstrated greater life satisfaction, a stronger sense of mission, practiced more forgiveness, and volunteered far more. They also had lower probabilities of drug use, early sexual initiation, STIs, and abnormal Pap test results, as well as fewer lifetime sexual partners.
The COVID-induced depression has also resulted in cognitive impairments of concentration and memory. Some adolescents have reported the benefits of meditating during the day, “God, please protect me and my family from loneliness, despair and an inability to meet the demands of daily life or provide for the family.”
Immediate actions are needed on the local, state, and federal levels to admit the serous mistakes made with the COVID guidelines and to make the necessary changes to protect youth (as well as their parents) from despair and suicidal impulses. There needs to be an admission that new strains of COVID have not increased fatality rates in those below the age of 70; there must be a concerted move to open schools, playgrounds, athletic fields and places of business. We must act responsibly and immediately to protect youth from the epidemic of hopelessness and suicidal impulses.
• Update (April 8, 2021): Listen to Dr. Fitzgibbons discuss this essay with Drew Mariani on Relevant Radio.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Two things to keep in mind about all of this:
.
1) Population controllers want fewer children and are okay with the butchering of pre-born children.
.
2) Fewer children now (by whatever means) also means fewer people to be born in the future.
.
I can’t see much incentive at this point by the Government to admit their errors. Actually, I think rather the reverse is true.
.
Interesting things coming out of Russia though: according to Pop.org, Putin is trying to implement relatively “pro-family” policies, including restrictions on abortion and abortion advocacy. I have not heard if Russia is in lockdown, but I would not be surprised if they are out of it sooner rather than later.
“Those who created the COVID guidelines misrepresented the risks of COVID.” That’s a bold statement to make without providing rigorous evidence. It makes it sound like “those” intentionally lied for nefarious purposes when in reality they did the best they could with the information they had. Statements like that quoted only serve to crest distrust, confusion, and division, all works of the evil one.
Your total trust in the government is amazing.
As a substitute teacher in Catholic schools of the Archdiocese of Chicago, I have worked almost every school day since schools opened for in-person instruction in the middle of last August. The schools relied on subs like me who were willing to take the “risk” of infection so they could be open to serve their families while a few teachers with medical or family issues were not able to be present in their classrooms. Meanwhile, most local public schools have been offering only “remote learning” with the tragic consequences for some children that Dr. Fitzgibbons describes. The schools in which I work exercise rigorous infection control measures and administrators, teachers, staff, and students are mindful of the possibility of being shut down by the Illinois Department of Public Health should protocols be deemed inadequate or there be a serious outbreak. There have been cases of infection and subsequent quarantine, but the schools have pressed ahead and provided nearly continuous in-person instruction. No students or staff in my area have, to my knowledge, died or been gravely ill during this school year.
To the extent that science relies on observation and experiment, the experiences of the Catholic schools in my area indicate that it is not very risky to have students and teachers in schools when reasonable infection control measures are observed (i.e., masks, social distancing, and sanitizing). It is remarkable how self-identified devotees of science ignore the empirical facts in front of their faces and defer to theorists in white lab coats who tell them that it is too risky for students and teachers to be in school. Look, we have demonstrated over the past seven months that it is possible to be in school with very little risk. It seems to me that the “science is real” crowd believe in science only if it suits their politics. Lord, may we fear the contagion of sin more than disease.
I think you are missing the point. We want children in schools without masks, isolation, distancing, and toxic disinfectants. Plus we want to remove the fear mongering that is not based on science and is furthered by these unnecessary and detrimental measures. These policies themselves are making our children psychologically and physically sick. Going to school, any school, under these circumstance is like going off to be tortured daily. Suicides are only the tip of the iceberg; there will be so much more to come.
Your perspective might actually be more in tune with the works of the evil one than you might realize. Given the far reaching harm that has been done, the draconian lockdowns in place, and the violation of basic rights, it’s difficult to argue that the people who instituted those policies had pure motives or good intentions. At best, that’s naive. At worst, you are defending the indefensible.
Athansius,
I think you missed, “The forced isolation of adolescents through COVID guidelines should be withdrawn immediately as a national policy to protect our youth from the severe epidemic of suicide that is far more dangerous to youth than is COVID.”
Sorry about that. My comment appeared under the wrong post. I was not responding to your points. My bad!
Masks are satanic and always used in occult rituals. Stop making kids wear masks. It’s just plain mean!
It’s never been about controlling a virus; it’s about controlling people.
Has anyone compared the number of drug overdoses and suicides for young people in the past 12 months to the number of deaths attributed to Covid in the same age groups?
I’d like to see what that looks like.
Here is your answer from the Swiss research in my article.
COVID guidelines which have insisted that masks and the closing of schools are necessary to protect youth have been disproved by Jonas Ludvigsson, a Swedish professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. His research was peer reviewed and published in a letter (“Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden”) in the March 2021 edition the New England Journal of Medicine.
Ludvigsson studied children from the ages of 1 to 16 during the first wave of the pandemic last spring. The children studied were not wearing face masks. Only 15 children went to the ICU—a rate of 0.77 per 100,000, according to the report. Four had “an underlying chronic coexisting condition” and “No child with Covid-19 died.”