Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Apr 19, 2021 / 16:03 pm (CNA).
Catholic scientists and ethicists have warned of the potential for a slippery slope in response to reports that scientists had successfully created a “chimeric embryo” that was part macaque monkey and part human.
An article published April 15 in the journal “Cell” described how scientists took a blastocyst from a macaque and added human cells. The blastocyst then developed into a chimeric embryo, meaning it has parts of two species. It is the goal that these beings could be used to grow human organs, which would then be used in transplantation.
Similar experiments have occurred using other animals; this was the first time a monkey-human chimera had been created.
“When it comes to the ethics of mixing cellular materials between humans and animals to produce ‘chimeric animals,’ the details of what researchers are doing will be of the essence,” Fr. Tad Pacholczyk, the director of education at the National Catholic Bioethics Center, told CNA.
An ethical example of this research, he said, would be to “implant human stem cells into embryonic monkeys in order to grow human hearts, kidneys, and other organs inside the monkey animal, primarily to alleviate serious donor shortages for organ transplants.”
This would be ethical “as long as certain limits and boundaries are respected.”
The reverse, however–adding monkey stem cells to a human–would “raise grave ethical objections,” he said.
Fr. Pacholczyk told CNA that among the boundaries needed for ethical experimentation of this type were a “goal to induce one species, the monkey, to grow an organ or tissue of the other,” instead of a goal of a creation of a “new” species.
“The procedures must not involve the replication of major pillars of human identity or human cognition in the monkey, such as through the human brain system,” he said, adding that the monkey should not be able to produce human gametes either.
Additionally, said Fr. Pacholczyk, “The procedures must not involve the creation, destruction or exploitation of human embryos,” and “The stem cells used for creating chimeric animals must be ethically-sourced.”
“In general, we make use of animals for a wide range of purposes — we eat them, we use them to make clothing, we use them for basic scientific research — so if we can use them to generate needed organs to save people’s lives without crossing fundamental ethical lines, this approach should be helpful,” he said.
Fr. Nicanor Austriaco, O.P., a professor of biology at Providence College, had a more sceptical view on the ethical nature of human-animal chimeras. Fr. Austriaco told CNA that the creation of animal-animal chimeras “could be justified if there were a pressing research question that would benefit human health.”
“However, it is problematic to attempt to make human-animal chimeras with primate embryos because of the danger that we could make a disabled human,” he said. “There are other animals like pigs that could be used to grow transplantable organs.”
Fr. Austriaco told CNA that he is “troubled” by this type of experimentation.
“I do not believe that our post-Christian and utilitarian society has the moral resources to draw the boundaries that should limit research with embryonic humans,” he said. “Experiments are thought to be justifiable if they can help some ease their suffering and pain.”
While similar experiments with pigs have been less successful, Fr. Austriaco called these experiments “an alternative that is not ethically fraught with danger in the same way.”
“I think that there is a genuine desire to advance human health and well-being,” he said. “However, in a post-Christian society that legalizes abortion, there is often little concern with creating and using human embryos as long as the science ‘helps’ people.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
“Catholic scientists and ethicists have warned of the potential for a slippery slope in response to reports that scientists had successfully created a “chimeric embryo” that was part macaque monkey and part human.”
.
So thankful I am not “educated.” Potential for a slippery slope? Oh, I’d say we are already on an an Olympic luge chute by this point. That Catholic scientists and ethicists can’t see it is a disgrace.
Madness continues to the point of challenging God’s intelligence. Although he is “more skeptical”, Fr Austriaco is incorrect from this writer’s perspective that there can ever be ethical justification for “the creation of animal-animal chimeras, that “could be justified if there were a pressing research question that would benefit human health” – if animal human chimeras were involved. Skepticism doesn’t suffice. When we dismiss God we turn to worship the intellect. Sans moral parameters natural law and what’s revealed to Man we may envision bizarre monstrosities. China reportedly is long and far advanced in this evil seeking to create a supersoldier mix between apes and humans. A more intelligent ape capable of command response and technical ability. I’m reminded of the Planet of the Apes and the sequel [both boring however now less so] Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Forgive me Lord. Would that such potential nightmare creatures were to turn on and annihilate the CCP and their smiling unethical Xi Ping. Some bitter food for thought. “Recent revelations that the US National Institute of Health (NIH) had been funding gain-of-function (GOF) research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology has shone a spotlight on China’s controversial research in biomedical sciences. Not only does China engage in GOF research, it also conducts another controversial experiment – creating human-animal chimeras for vaccines and organ transplants. Now, Alzheimer researchers want to go a step further and are proposing using human-monkey chimeras to give monkeys a human brain. However, this raises many ethical questions, given that the brain is the center of cognition and reflection. For example, should the human-animal hybrid develop a human-like nervous system capable of consciousness, at what point then does a chimeric brain become less monkey, and more human? Writing in the Wall Street Journal, John Ratcliffe President Trump’s director of national intelligence said: ‘The intelligence is clear: Beijing intends to dominate the US and the rest of the planet economically, militarily and technologically. Many of China’s major public initiatives and prominent companies offer only a layer of camouflage to the activities of the Chinese Communist Party.’ Ratcliffe said China had gone to extraordinary lengths to achieve its goal, The Guardian reported. ‘US intelligence shows that China has even conducted human testing on members of the People’s Liberation Army in hope of developing soldiers with biologically enhanced capabilities,’ Ratcliffe wrote. ‘There are no ethical boundaries to Beijing’s pursuit of power’” (Asia Times Christina Lin May 16 2020 Dave Makichuk April 18 2021).