Rhode Island statue of Jesus vandalized

Denver Newsroom, Oct 9, 2020 / 05:40 pm (CNA).- The Archdiocese of New Orleans defended on Friday its handling of a priest who sent text messages to at least one high school student, in violation of archdiocesan policy. An attorney representing the student said the priest’s texts were grooming behavior, and the archdiocesan response put students at risk.

“This man preyed on kids who were at risk, sons who were in need of strong, strong male figures in their lives, and that’s what he gave them,” attorney Bill Arata told CNA Oct. 9, in reference to Fr. Pat Wattingy, who was until July chaplain at John Paul II High School in Slidell, Louisiana.

Wattingy was removed from ministry Oct. 1, after he admitted that in 2013 he sexually abused a minor, the same year he was transferred from ministry at Archbishop Rummel High School outside New Orleans.

Until July, Wattingy was chaplain of John Paul II High School in Slidell, Louisiana.

Arata told CNA that in February 2020, he presented the archdiocese with 50 pages of text messages between Wattingy and students, which he claims were part of a pattern of grooming.

Arata said the texts repeatedly asked a male student when he would turn 18, and that both texts and calls came at inappropriate hours.

“So let me just be blunt. The calls came at midnight, one-o-clock in the morning. If that’s all you knew about a priest communicating with a child, a minor, we could stop there, right?”

“But we don’t. Let’s take it to the next level. No fewer— and I’m not talking about one child, I’m talking about several— but let’s just use a one-child situation. Six, seven times, he wanted to know when the child would turn 18. He brought him special lunches, he invited him to his house in Georgia, he’s sending pictures at Christmas from the house in Georgia,” Arata said.

“Did he mean with his mom? His dad? Maybe his older brother? No, none of those texts went to anybody but the child,” the attorney claimed.

The archdiocese claims that the texts did not contain “sexual references or innuendo” but still violated the archdiocesan policies about communication with youth.

The priest was reportedly admonished by archdiocesan officials to stop sending texts and permitted to remain in ministry at the school. He remained chaplain until he sent additional texts to at least one student and was reportedly sent by the archdiocese for a psychological evaluation.

Arata claims that an archdiocesan attorney acknowledged to him that the texts were grooming behavior, and that the priest began texting just six weeks or so after he was told to stop contacting children.

CNA requested copies of text messages to review, but Arata said his clients had not given him permission to release them to the media.

The school’s principal, Douglas Triche, wrote to parents this week saying that he had not been notified about the inappropriate texts sent by Wattingy. But Arata raised objections to Triche’s claims.

Triche told parents, Arata said, “that he may have heard rumors, but he did not know. Who’d he hear the rumors from? When did he hear the rumors? Why didn’t he act when he heard them? Those are questions I would automatically ask.”

The principal could not be reached by CNA for comment.

Arata told CNA that he believes the archdiocese had reason to be suspicious of Wattingy when the text messages were initially reported.

“The archdiocese has moved him seven times in 26 years. The average contract is five years, right? Help me understand, that’s 3.7 years per place. Why’d you move him? And then they want us to believe that the first time they ever heard of an issue at Rummel was on Thursday, October 1, 2020?” Wattingy asked.

The lawyer also said that he supplied additional text messages from the priest to students after the initial batch in February, and that he was told it was being handled. Then in June, he says he was told the priest was being sent for a psychological evaluation.

The lawyer said that if the text messages to students did not represent a problem, the archdiocese would have had no reason to send the priest for an evaluation. He said sending the priest for an evaluation confirms that the archdiocese knew the texts were not appropriate.

In a statement on Friday, in which New Orleans Archbishop Gregory Aymond addressed the situations of Wattingy and Fr. Travis Clark, a New Orleans priest arrested for filming pornographic videos on an altar, Aymond said that Wattingy would never again serve in public ministry.

Aymond said of the 2013 abuse, “there was no prior accusation and we knew nothing about the abuse before Oct. 1.”

The archbishop repeated his claim that “the texts did not indicate abuse and there was no allegation of sexual abuse. I am sorry for the pain that this has caused.”

After the archbishop released his statement, CNA asked the archdiocese who at the archdiocese had evaluated the texts, and whether the archdiocese considered them to constitute grooming behavior.

“We stand by the assertion that they are not sexual in nature and did not indicate abuse but were a violation of our Technology Policy,” a spokesperson for the archdiocese told CNA.

Arata, whose child is a student at John Paul II High School, told CNA that he and his clients are weighing options regarding the possibility of litigation.

Jonah McKeown contributed to this report.

[…]

CNA Staff, Nov 2, 2020 / 10:30 am (CNA).- Joe Biden has released a video insisting that his personal politics remain in line with Catholic social teaching. In the video, released on the eve of the general election, Biden asserts that he has the “… […]

Denver Newsroom, Aug 3, 2020 / 07:15 pm (CNA).-  

The one-time leader of a progressive Catholic political advocacy organization said Monday the group’s former executive director, who is now vying for a Congressional seat in Tennessee, defrauded the organization and eventually left it bankrupt.

“I’m speaking publicly now, with very little interest in scoring points. I’m simply here to speak on the record, to establish a fact pattern, to help explain to the public the disappointing experience I have had with Chris Hale,” said James Salt, a former board member of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, in a livestream announcement Aug. 3.

Hale is running in the Democratic primary in Tennessee’s 4th Congressional District. His opponent in that race, Noelle Bivens, hosted a livestreamed event with Salt on Monday evening, after local media reported that Hale is accused of misusing email lists from his former employer to fundraise for his own benefit.

Salt said the political advocacy group, which aimed to advance Democratic candidates and policy initiatives by appealing to Catholics, was financially and legally harmed by Hale’s leadership of the organization.

“My job is simply to be on the record saying he did a great disservice to everyone who has worked with him.”

After Hale was hired as executive director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good in 2013, Salt said, “we began to see a pattern of Chris obfuscating and avoiding any kind of accountability.”

Eventually, Salt said, Hale lied about filing financial records, and once told colleagues he was having surgery, which was apparently not true, in order to excuse missed work.

Hale was fired from the group in 2017, Salt said.

He is accused of leaving with the organization’s mailing and email donor lists, and using them after he was fired to fundraise for an initiative he started later that year, called The Francis Project.

According to documents obtained by the Murfreesboro Voice, Hale was asked repeatedly to stop using those lists for fundraising, but continued to do so as late as December 2019.

In a Jan. 24 letter to Washington, D.C’s attorney general, Lawyers for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, and the related Catholics United organization, said that The Francis Project was not actually a non-profit, but was instead a trade name connected to a Washington, DC for-profit corporation incorporated by Hale, and registered as “Christopher Hale.”

An archived version of the Francis Project website makes requests for donations, and opportunities to sign up for various mailing lists, but offers evidence of no other substantive activity.

Catholics United said in its letter it was concerned that Hale’s previous affiliation with the group, “which supported policy initiatives consistent with Catholic social teachings, could mislead email recipients to believe they are making tax-deductible contributions to the Organization directly or to a similar religious nonprofit group.”

The group asked the District of Columbia’s attorney general “to review this matter and take all steps necessary to investigate and stop Mr. Hale from continuing his deceitful and fraudulent fundraising tactics.”

“Mr. Hale’s dishonest actions undermine the values of integrity and trust that are crucial in the charitable fundraising process,” the group said.

Hale could not be reached immediately for comment and his campaign has not yet made a statement.

Bivens, his primary opponent, said Monday night that she does not know if Hale will drop out of the race. While she acknowledged that some in the district have voted already by mail, “going into a general with Chris Hale as the nominee would be a nightmare.”

Hale ran for Congress in the same Congressional district in 2018, but lost in the Democratic primary. He was projected by some political observers to win the 2020 primary, but was not expected to unseat the district’s incumbent Republican congressman. The district is heavily Republican, and has been represented by physician Scott DesJarlais since 2011. DesJarlais won nearly 64% of the vote in the district’s 2018 election.

Hale is cofounder of the Millennial Journal, and worked in 2012 as part of the Catholic outreach team in the reelection campaign of President Barack Obama.

Salt himself has been involved in controversy surrounding Catholics United.

Ahead of the 2012 election, Salt, then-executive director of Catholics United, said in a letter to pastors of Florida Catholic churches the group had recruited a network of volunteers to monitor election-related speech in churches for reputed illegal political activity. Local Catholic leaders said this appeared to be “an attempt to silence pastors on issues that are of concern to the Church this election season.”

Eventually Florida’s bishops urged pastors not to sign a pledge circulated by the group to “keep politics out of the pulpits.”

Salt previously served in faith outreach for the Kansas Democratic Party and did messaging work under then-Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a staunch pro-abortion rights advocate. Salt served on the 2012 Democratic Party Platform Committee.

Catholics in Alliance and Catholics United, which effectively merged in 2015, were both founded in the wake of then-Sen. John Kerry’s defeat in the 2004 presidential election campaigns. This loss was in part attributed to the failure of Democrats to sway religious voters.

In 2008 then-Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput charged that Catholics United had “confused the natural priorities of Catholic social teaching, undermined the progress pro-lifers have made, and provided an excuse for some Catholics to abandon the abortion issue instead of fighting within their parties and at the ballot box to protect the unborn.”I

Catholics in Alliance itself received at least $450,000 in funding from the Open Society Foundations, then known as the Open Society Institute, from 2006 to 2010. An internal foundations document from 2009 cited the group’s key role in influencing Barack Obama’s controversial 2009 Notre Dame speech, and praised its campaigns that “broadened the agenda” of Catholic voters to see abortion as just one of several election issues.

Catholics United also received funding from the Gill Foundation, founded by savvy LGBT strategist and millionaire Tim Gill. The group was listed as a partner on the website of the Arcus Foundation, which has funded dissenting Catholic groups and other religious organizations to advocate on LGBT issues as well as for stricter limits on religious freedom.

Ahead of the 2016 elections, Wikileaks posted 2012 emails apparently involving Hillary Clinton campaign chief John Podesta, at a time of significant Catholic controversy over mandatory health plan coverage of contraception.

Podesta’s email responded to Sandy Newman’s suggestion of a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Church which, in Newman’s vivid words, “Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church.”

Podesta, a former chief of staff for President Bill Clinton, replied: “We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up.”

According to Open Society Foundations internal documents from 2009, the departure of Catholics in Alliance co-founder Alexia Kelley to join the Obama White House left the group “without strong leadership.” Kelley eventually became president and CEO of the influential philanthropy consortium Foundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities.

[…]