Washington D.C., Aug 24, 2017 / 03:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- People are probably familiar with white supremacist groups like neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan – both of which made an appearance at the violent rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia that shocked the nation and the world.
But what of the self-described “alt-right” movement, which drew a younger crowd and appears to espouse some of the same tenets? Is it just the same white nationalism, re-manifested?
And, what is white nationalism, exactly? Although there’s intense historical and contemporary disagreement over which ethnicities count as “white,” the phrase could be summed up as an ideology which holds that there is a distinct white “race.” What’s more, white nationalists advocate for the protection and advancement of so-called “white” nations and cultures against perceived threats like miscegenation, immigration and multiculturalism.
While some of the ideologies behind white nationalism are rooted in 18th and early 19th century racial politics, a large portion of the movement’s rhetoric stems from the rise of nationalism as a political model, along with common conceptions of race and eugenics popular at the end of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The “alt-right” movement, centered on nationalism and far right-wing politics, was named so in 2010 by self-avowed white nationalist Richard Spencer, and includes many white nationalist members.
The movement has coalesced online around an ever-evolving lexicon of memes and jokes, a focus on preserving what they call “white identity,” and vocal resistance to that identity’s perceived threats – including from immigrants, feminists, Muslims and Jews.
Alt-right blogger voxday described how he thinks the movement conceives of its goals, pointing out its “philosophy of offense” and nationalism. At “alt-right” events and in “alt-right” webspace, overtly racist terms like “The Daily Shoah” – referencing the Holocaust – and “cuck” (short for “cuckhold” – a vulgar term for miscegenation), find their way into the lexicon of terms used next to frog cartoons and Twitter screen caps.
Phillip de Mahy, a Ph.D. student studying at the Catholic University of America, researches online communities and explained some of the trends that mark the alt-right movement.
One of the most important aspects of the movement, he told CNA, is its shifting set of beliefs and alliances. “If you look at the message boards,” de Mahy explained, “there’s lots of disagreement about who’s in or out.” The tactics and political goals of the movement as a whole are also difficult to define with precision, he said.
“There’s many people in the alt-right who will say this is just the logical extension of the Republican platform,” de Mahy said, noting that in many cases, the alt-right supports many of the same policies or actions of conventional Republicans on issues like immigration or foreign policy.
However, what differentiates the two groups, he says, are the reasons that the alt-right and other white nationalist groups have for supporting these positions. They do so to “bring about the racial purity of the nation,” he said.
“I don’t think there’s many people that would identify with the movement who would have any trouble saying that, euphemistically, it’s White Identity politics or Pro-White politics, which is, in reality, White Nationalism,” de Mahy clarified.
However, according to “Ignatius,” a former writer for Breitbart who spent time observing the alt-right, the history of the movement is slightly more complex. What differentiates the alt-right from other racist groups, he said, is its use of the internet and internet culture.
“If you look at its origins and growth, it’s almost entirely from internet forums, based on internet memes, and consequentially it has the infectious nature of the memes,” he said in a written response to CNA.
Historically, the alt-right has organized around this culture which has accepted a range of controversial anti-feminist, anti-Islam, anti-immigration and white nationalist beliefs.
However, Ignatius pointed out, many Catholics who have political beliefs that could be considered alt-right “realize the evil of racism, how race is such a malleable and meaningless concept, how opposed, to Church teaching it is.”
And many of these people have been drawn to the movement by its strong denunciation of perceived problems within modern society, he said. However, even for those who don’t initially hold racist views themselves, the alt-right could still prove dangerous, Ignatius noted.
In many places in the movement, it is “more permissible for someone to be slightly racist” than it is for them to promote monarchist or feudalist ideals, he said. Thus, when some casual members of the group’s internet meme culture seek an ideological home in the alt-right, “it’s incredibly easy to slip into all forms of horrendous racism,” he warned.
“The alt-right requires one to sublimate religion to race in a lot of ways, hence calling the pope a ‘cuck,’” or “disliking” Guinean cardinal Robert Sarah, he said.
Furthermore, many members of the alt-right who were focused on other forms of nationalism but who were not racist have left the movement in the wake of the 2016 election, he said.
During the presidential election, groups like “traditionalists, white nationalists, libertarians, civic nationalists” all coalesced, but since then “non-overtly-racist civic nationalists” have left the movement. This has allowed the more openly white nationalist elements to define what the alt-right is, both within online communities and to the outside world,” Ignatius said.
“Although I’ve said that the alt right is nebulous to the point where it’s hard to call them universally racists, it’s accurate to say it’s a racist movement.”
There are other morally reprehensible beliefs held by some in the alt-right, he noted, particularly support for abortion in non-white communities and the belief in paganism of some members.
In an April 2016 article for Radix Journal – a publication started by Richard Spencer – Aylmer Fisher pushed back against what he called the “pro-life temptation.”
Fisher argued that the pro-life position is “dysgenic” because it does not oppose birth among populations that are more likely to be below the poverty line and more likely to be of African-American or Hispanic heritage.
“Not only is the pro-life movement dysgenic,” Fisher wrote, “but its justifications rely on principles we generally reject. The alt-right is skeptical, to say the least, of concepts like ‘equality’ and ‘human rights,’ especially as bases for policy. The unborn fetus has no connection to anyone else in the community.”
He criticized pro-lifers, saying that those who are interested in “banning abortion because it’s ‘racist’ or adopting children from Africa, are the ultimate cuckservatives.”
While it’s unclear how seriously most members of the alt-right promote abortion, or how many support abortion access, it’s been a “consistent” topic of conversation among some of the group’s most vocal leaders and on some message boards, de Mahy said.
“They’re very explicit about the fact that this is a form of eugenics and that’s a good thing,” he said. Ultimately, “the alt-right would consider themselves to be pro-white and differing on the specifics of how to realize the furthering of the White Race. They would disagree about whether some things are pragmatic,” he said of support for abortion.
And while some members of the alt-right are Christian and while some see the Christian legacy – like historic Christian Europe – as a foundation for their worldview, others just see it as a vehicle for carrying their racist agenda. Or, they despise Christianity altogether.
“A lot of these people are very explicitly Atheist,” de Mahy said. “The overarching understanding of religion is largely instrumentalist.”
Some argue that Christianity is a compromised belief system because it is not defined by ethnic ties, and they find an alternative in paganism – particularly Nordic paganism – and its ties to the historic peoples of European descent.
Joseph Pearce, a senior editor at the Augustine Institute, has written a book about his previous involvement in the white supremacist movement and his subsequent conversion, “Race With the Devil: My Journey from Racial Hatred to Rational Love.” He recently wrote an opinion piece in the National Catholic Register, “Charlottesville Through the Eyes of an ex-White Supremacist.”
In his youth, Pearce had joined a white supremacist party in Great Britain, edited a white supremacist magazine, and was involved in violent street encounters with political opponents. Pearce twice spent time in prison, yet began reading St. Thomas Aquinas, Blessed John Henry Newman, and other Catholic authors during his second prison term on his path to conversion.
But why might young people be attracted to the white supremacist movement? Pearce told CAN that he joined it the because of “pride.” This also motivates other young men who are joining the movement today, he said, because “we live in a culture which is antithetical to Christianity, because it elevates pride.”
Younger generations are “all about self-identity now, basically constructing a cosmos in conformity with your own desires, wishes, prejudices,” he said. And they are looking to “tribalism,” which racism is a part of, because that offers a collective sense of pride.
“I think that tribalism’s on the rise because we’re not teaching generations these days about virtue, about Christianity, about humility, about love being laying down your life for the beloved, which is the other, including your enemy,” he said.
“We’re producing whole generations of people who are animated and motivated by pride, and racial pride will be one of those manifestations.”
For those who seriously believe in white nationalism, Catholics must forcefully condemn their beliefs but pray for their souls, Pearce said.
“I was a white supremacist. I went to prison twice. I was demonized by the culture, perhaps rightly so,” he said. “Certainly my ideas should have been demonized by the culture.”
“But I was a human being, and I wasn’t beyond the reach of the love of God, because God reached me in the prison cell,” he said, noting that his conversion began while he was serving his second prison sentence at the age of 24.
For one who is part of the white nationalist movement, we must be “hoping that he can be brought to the love of Christ and brought to conversion,” Pearce said. “God laid down his life for sinners, and we’re all sinners.”
[…]
What right do these bishops have to deny conscience protections of the faithful? I’m willing to bet these are the same bishops who objected to the Eucharistic document as well as who give pro-abortion politicians a pass.
“Mandatory vaccination policies need appropriate accommodations for medical or religious reasons”(NHA). NCBC citing in agreement with its ethics the Nat Hosp Assoc on a median between the Common Good and individual conscience. Although that’s where there can be no universal rule because the conditions differ in various settings. Deliberation of those conditions can arrive at a just mean between excess and defect that may not be perfect, although correct when close to the mean. So there will always be instances of disagreement even dispute the final decision necessarily belonging to the institution rather than the individual and or unions representing staff. Maintaining order requires this. This is the issue now in State and municipal government where the individual depends on the expertise and grasp of justice of officials. How vital a requirement one that is frequently not met.
Justice exceptional from all the virtues is not subject to measure. Justice, the right, or the good incorporates all the virtues. Moral acts are either good or evil, just or unjust. While there are circumstances in which the Common Good may be measured for example when risk is variable and containable, such as in the general populace, there are those in which the risk may warrant a mandate for the CovidVax that is a matter of Justice, such as nursing homes, medical delivery centers.
An addendum to my comment. Justice has no mean because an act of justice is either just or it is not. For example abortion, murder, forgiveness [from the heart], the first two always evil the second always good, whereas the virtues like prudence, fortitude do have a mean. A vaccine mandate is measured to the common good.
“Several bishops in California, and the Archdiocese of New York, have instructed priests not to provide religious exemption letters for those Catholics who object to the vaccine mandate.”
The Church used to be a haven from the tyranny of the State, but now has – in many places – become an instrument of the State in enforcing its tyranny in the name of God.
A government that can mandate that you submit to a vaccine for “the public good” can also mandate that you submit to an abortion or sterilization for “the public good.”
This is the first sign of a crack in the dam of ‘Catholics for abortion products on demand’ as they begin to consider that perhaps, just perhaps they are in colossal danger.
Lying that ‘The Church encourages people to receive vaccination for COVID-19, even though the currently available vaccines in the U.S. have a remote connection to abortion through the use of certain cell lines.’is bad.
But not having a justification WHY the church encourages these products has let the cat out if the bag…
It’s not about “remote cooperation” with past abortions and the cell lines developed and used in the research, development, production and/or testing of the currently available vaccines. It’s about approving this type of research going forward. If the bishops had demanded that Operation Warp Speed support at least one vaccine with no connection to these immoral practices, we would have had at least one (from Sorrento Therapeutics). Catholics could have, in good conscience, availed themselves of this morally produced vaccine. As it is, we are facing persecution on the basis of our religious beliefs as the Federal Government moves toward vaccine mandates. This could have been easily avoided.
Was it not pagan tribes that sacrificed the innocent to their “gods of common good” and the explorers brought the Christian TRUE GOD. Whwn we try to save our lives or money or careers by sarificing the innocent babies, we do far worse because we have had the opportunity to know HIM the author of LIFe, We should be having processions and public rosaries and have faith enough to move mountains. There is only one innocent body and blood I choose to take into my body and on my doorpost. What is wrong here?? The sick culture is taking us in.
What if the “infectious agent” is not Sars-COV-2 virus – which has never been isolated in a human – which is not used in the so-called “vaccines” (which don’t meet the definition)? What of the injection itself is the “infectious agent” because of the transfer (“shedding”) of its components – like spike proteins (Salk Inst. proved 4/21 they are the cause of the blood clotting and heart issues we now see) and graphene (toxin)? So who has the responsibility to protect others? … But we’re all in this together now. Now the only answer is charity. And speaking the truth. Even about the injections. In love.
On Page 149 # 1782, Taken from our Catholic Catechism: It States and I quote, Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. “He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience”. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience,especially in religious matters.~2106 No one not even the Pope or any Political leader can force anyone to act aginst their conscience, putting Aborted Fetal Tissue into ones body, Goes against the Conscience of Christians, we can’t do it even if their was some kind of good coming from it.page,441:#1789~ Some rules apply in every case: One May never do evil so that good will result from it;1756~ What greater evil is there in our World then the murder of the innocents in their Mother’s womb? My Conscience, can’t Allow me to derive some kind of benefit from the destruction of the Innocent, Period~ and my Catholic Faith backs this up entirely!
This is all part of The Coming Of The Kingdom on u-tube! our Church is in turmoil, our country is in turmoil and our world is in turmoil!!!! We as Catholics have to stand strong in our religion with prayers to Our Father, The Blessed Virgin, Jesus and The Holy Spirit to drive out the anti-Christ (satan) who is creating this havoc. We need to spread God’s word.
It has been scientifically and medically established that the so-called ‘vaccine'(s) for covid19 neither prevents infection nor spreading of the virus. It only mitigates (for most people) the severity of the infection. With this in mind, we should be charitable toward others who are misinformed. The most frustrating aspect is the lack of honest factual statements of the value as well as the limitations of this treatment – whose long term health effects are completely unknown at present. A little balanced information, a little charity, open minds and a lot of faithful prayer are more needed than contentious argument.