London, England, Oct 18, 2021 / 05:00 am (CNA).
A Catholic priest said on Sunday that he respected the police’s decision not to grant him access to a crime scene to give the last rites to the British lawmaker Sir David Amess.
In a now-deleted video posted to his Twitter account on Oct. 17, Fr. Jeff Woolnough said he hoped that his remarks would be the “end of the matter.”
The pastor of St. Peter’s Catholic Church in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, went to Belfairs Methodist Church on Oct. 15 after he heard that the Catholic Member of Parliament had been stabbed during a meeting with constituents.
A police officer outside the church relayed his request to enter the building, but the priest was not admitted inside. He prayed the rosary outside the police cordon instead.
“Yes, I was refused entry but I respected that decision by the police, I had to, and the fact that I was praying the rosary — end of the matter,” Woolnough said in the brief video recorded in a car.
“If anyone continues to want to criticize me for that, then that’s your right to do it, but this is what actually happened, OK.”
He said he was “astounded” that his conversation with the police was reported in the media.
“I did not go to the press, just to let you know, and God bless you all on this tricky time,” he commented.
Police arrested a 25-year-old man at the church on suspicion of murder. The BBC reported that the suspect, currently being held at a London police station under the Terrorism Act 2000, is Ali Harbi Ali, a British national of Somali descent.
The BBC said that the suspect was previously referred to the Prevent scheme, which seeks to stop radicalization.
Essex Police said in an Oct. 16 statement: “As with any police incident, it is of the utmost importance that we preserve the integrity of a crime scene and allow emergency services to tend to those in need.”
“A cordon is put in place to secure and prevent contamination of the area. Access into a scene is at the discretion of the investigating officers. This is a fundamental part of any investigation to ensure the best possible chance of securing justice for any victim and their family.”
“A cordon can also be used to restrict an area for emergency services to administer potentially life-saving medical treatment in as much privacy as possible and to allow officers to confirm that an area is safe to enter.”
The Church helps to prepare Catholics for death by offering them the sacraments of reconciliation, the anointing of the sick, and viaticum (Holy Communion.)
The Catechism of the Catholic Church says: “In addition to the Anointing of the Sick, the Church offers those who are about to leave this life the Eucharist as viaticum. Communion in the body and blood of Christ, received at this moment of ‘passing over’ to the Father, has a particular significance and importance.”
The journalist Melanie McDonagh criticized the police’s decision not to admit Woolnough to the crime scene.
“The most troubling element of the [Essex Police] statement is that the police wanted to ‘allow the emergency services to tend to those in need.’ A priest is an emergency service,” she wrote in the British weekly The Spectator on Oct. 16.
“In the case of Sir David, the priest was someone who could help see him into the next world, not just keep him in this one. You don’t have to share a belief in the efficacy of confession to go along with this; you just need a very elementary knowledge of and respect for the faith to refrain from standing between a confessor and a dying man.”
Writing in the Telegraph newspaper on Oct. 18, the journalist Tim Stanley noted that according to the College of Policing, a professional body for the police in England and Wales, there is no national guidance on priests administering the last rites.
He wrote: “The lack of a national policy on the last rites implies that whether or not a priest gets access to a dying person might depend upon circumstances (understandable, because one doesn’t want to impede the police from doing their job) — or else, which is far less forgivable, upon the religious literacy of the individual officer on duty.”
MPs are due to gather in the House of Commons on Monday to pay their respects to Sir David, who served in the House for 38 years.
The 69-year-old Conservative MP established the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Holy See in 2006 and played a crucial role in organizing Benedict XVI’s landmark visit to Parliament in 2010.
In a tribute on Oct. 15, Cardinal Vincent Nichols of Westminster said that the pro-life politician “carried out his vocation as a Catholic in public life with generosity and integrity.”
Bishop Alan Williams of Brentwood, the diocese that covers the county of Essex, noted that the MP “had a deep Catholic Christian faith which expressed itself in great generosity and kindness to those he served in the wider community of Essex and East London.”
“I experienced firsthand his friendliness, goodness, and concern for others; he was a very fine man who gave himself wholeheartedly to public life,” he said in an Oct. 15 statement.
“The manner of his dying is utterly shocking and I ask all members of the diocese to pray for Sir David and all those who will be affected by his sudden and painful absence in our lives.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Indeed the police do have an obligation to “secure a murder scene”. That being said, it would appear that this death happened in front of dozens of witnesses and there is no way therefore they could mistake what happened,who did it, or imagine this was a suicide or an accident. The cops were in fact being WAY overzealous in keeping this priest away from the victim. As long as he did not attempt to interfere with emergency medical technicians there to help the victim, there is no way they can justify this decision. The scene in no way would have been “compromised”. My two observations: Britain has been actively hostile toward religion for some time,with new abortion laws, mandated closed churches and the like, especially since Covid hit. Maybe this is why they are turning into a 3rd rate pest-hole. Secondly, I am a little disappointed in how the priest involved has shrugged off their actions in keeping him away from the victim. Maybe he is fearful of repercussions from church higher ups or govt agents if he complains too loudly. However, what happened here is NOT ok, and he should be saying as much. The priest “respected their decision”???? REALLY??? If so, very sad indeed.
THANK YOU, LJ!
Spot on.
Had this been a Muslim stabbing victim, would the Coppers deny entry to an Imam? Just sayin’
You are absolutely correct. I can see no reason other than ignorance (preferable to bigotry) that a dying man was denied the comfort of a priest at such a time as his dying moments. The poor Priest is no doubt under pressure to play down the terrible decision.
With such rationalization “pandemic” amongst the clergy class one is left to wonder if the Holy Priesthood any longer exists. Just how are such joes making a living? This apparently is what we get for our dime?
Be not deceived. It is not myself diminishing the Holy Priesthood with this comment, it is the behavior which has provoked it that diminishes the Holy Priesthood.
If you don’t like the responsibility be gone, “Father.”
Priests seem relatively passive in the face of being denied the right to perform one of their most important functions: the administration of the sacraments. Clergy consistently put their lives at risk during bubonic plague outbreaks in order to administer the sacraments. During an outbreak of Covid-19, an essentially non-lethal disease, they seem for the most part to have shrugged off the spiritual needs of their parishioners, leaving them without the Last Rites, Confession, Mass–you name it. So why should this guy be any different? And which of their pastoral duties will they abandon next?
As Melanie McDonagh wrote, “a priest is an emergency service.” I have a modest suggestion. How about bishops reach out to the large police and emergency services departments in their dioceses, and delegate their priests and deacons to reach out to the smaller ones, in order to ask the leadership to insure that responders are aware that the Roman Catholic Church considers priests to be essential emergency service responders. Bishops could also supply their priests with laminated cards saying something like, “As Bishop of [], I respectfully request that my priest be allowed to minister to the member(s) of my flock who require immediate administration of essential Roman Catholic sacraments. I will view any official’s actions preventing my priest’s access to the member(s) of my flock as an extremely serious matter.” Priests responding to emergencies could hand the card to the incident manager on the scene, which might expedite access to the victim(s). I learned as a U.S. consular officer that these preparations can make stressful situations easier to handle and lead to more favorable results. Perhaps such measures are already in place in many dioceses?
All priests in good standing with their bishop carry identification stating the same.
This sad and unacceptable situation made me recall the brave actions of Fr. Mychal Fallon Judge. Sometimes we need to break rules.
His actions on 9/11 were admirable and heroic but do not negate his decidedly unheroic and indeed sacrilegious jettisoning of the Church’s perennial Magisterium on the issue of homosexuality and, by extension, other irrefutable teachings on sexual morality.