Under the heading “Keeping safe,” the parish asked Massgoers to use hand sanitizer and wear a face covering when attending the parish’s three churches.
“If you are not vaccinated and/or won’t wear a mask, please do not come to Mass,” it said.
The parish made the same request in its newsletters on Dec. 19 and Christmas Day, but not in its latest bulletin on Jan. 2.
The policy was criticized on social media, with one Catholic priest describing it as “scandalous, sinister, and unchristian.”
Asked if local Bishop Patrick McKinney supported the parish’s stance, a spokesperson for the Diocese of Nottingham said that vaccination status should not be a “barrier” to Catholics attending Mass.
“The law states that face coverings are mandatory during Mass unless you are exempt and we trust all of our parishes to ensure that this legal requirement is implemented with charity and courtesy,” the spokesperson said on Jan. 4.
“While many in the Catholic Church in England and Wales and beyond have been vocal in encouraging the faithful to receive the COVID-19 vaccine for their own protection and for the protection of others, this choice is ultimately a matter of individual conscience.”
“The decision to decline the vaccine should not be a barrier to receiving the sacraments or attending Mass.”
CNA understands that the parish, recently formed after the merger of the parishes of St. Augustine’s, Our Lady & St. Edward’s, and Sacred Heart, offers free masks to churchgoers and does not check the vaccination status of people attending Mass.
Parish community coordinator Diane Williams told CNA on Jan. 4 that the request was intended to protect members of the community from infection and hospitalization.
“We are trying our hardest to protect our community from hospital admission, especially the elderly and vulnerable, and our overworked NHS in a city where the vaccination rates are one of the lowest in the country,” she said via email.
She pointed to government data showing that within the Nottingham local authority area, 36.4% of people aged 12 years and over have received a booster or third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. In some local authority areas, the figure is as high as 70%.
Yet the omicron variant is reportedly spreading quickly even among those fully vaccinated.
An estimated 1 in 15 people in England tested positive for the virus in the last week of 2021. But the government has so far ruled out another nationwide lockdown.
The Vatican underlined its support for COVID-19 vaccines last month amid global concern about the rapid spread of the omicron variant.
“The Holy Father has defined vaccination as ‘an act of love,’ since it is aimed at the protection of people against COVID-19,” the Holy See press office said on Dec. 22.
The Vatican’s intervention came as countries around the world imposed new restrictions aimed at slowing the spread of the omicron variant, which is believed to spread more easily than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The measures have prompted protests in several European countries.
Dutch riot police broke up an anti-lockdown protest attended by several thousand people in Amsterdam on Jan. 2, reported Reuters.
An estimated 44,000 people attended a rally against compulsory vaccines in Vienna on Dec. 11, after the government announced that Austria would become the first Western country to introduce mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 from February 2022.
Italy has seen strikes and protests in response to the government’s decision to make the country’s Green Pass mandatory for workers. A Green Pass proves that the holder has been vaccinated, tested negative every 48 hours, or recently recovered from COVID-19.
Last month’s Vatican statement did not address the debate about mandatory vaccination. The most recent Vatican intervention on the topic came in 2020.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said in its “Note on the morality of using some anti-COVID-19 vaccines,” issued on Dec. 21, 2020, that “vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Pope Benedict XVI announced his intention to resign the papacy during a meeting of cardinals Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which he made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. / Vatican Media
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 2, 2023 / 06:00 am (CNA).
On Feb. 11, 2013, before a gathering of cardinals who had come to the Vatican expecting to hear the announcement of upcoming canonizations, Pope Benedict XVI dropped a bombshell.
After a few announcements about Church business at the conclusion of the meeting, the pope took out two sheets of paper and read a prepared statement in Latin.
“I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry,” the then 85-year-old pontiff told the gathering of the Catholic Church’s highest-ranking clergymen.
Because he spoke in Latin, the language used for official Vatican proclamations, reporters present did not at first realize that the pope had just stepped down.
‘Total surprise, total shock’
The assembled cardinals, on the other hand, who knew their Latin, reacted with stunned silence.
American Cardinal James Stafford later told CNA that the pope’s statement was received with “total surprise, total shock.”
“A cardinal who was sitting next to me said, ‘Did he resign?’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s what he did. He resigned.’ And we just all stood at our places.”
Cardinals react to Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement of his intention to resign the papacy Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which Benedict made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. Vatican Media
Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze, who was present that morning, said the announcement was a “surprise, like thunder that gives no notice that it’s coming,” reported The Catholic Telegraph.
In renouncing the papacy, Benedict became only the second pope in almost 600 years to voluntarily step down. In 1294, Pietro da Morrone, an elderly hermit, was crowned Pope Celestine V, but finding the demands of the job too much for him, he resigned after only five months.
In 1415, Pope Gregory XII also resigned, but under very different circumstances — he stepped down in order to end a crisis within the Church known as the Great Western Schism.
Title, white clothes, and papal coat of arms
What happened next with Benedict XVI was no less surprising to those who expected him to live as a retired cardinal.
In his last official statement as pope, before a general audience on Feb. 27, 2013, Pope Benedict assured the tens of thousands of people gathered to hear him speak as pope for the last time that even though he was stepping back from official duties, he would remain, in essence, pope.
“The ‘always’ is also a ‘forever’ — there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this,” Benedict said.
“I do not return to private life, to a life of travel, meetings, receptions, conferences, and so on. I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord,” he told the crowd.
A day earlier, on Feb. 26, 2013, the director of the Vatican Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi, had silenced speculation over what Benedict would be called and what he would wear. He would, Lombardi said, retain the trappings of the papacy — most significantly, his title and dress.
“He will still be called His Holiness Benedict XVI,” Lombardi said. “But he will also be called Pope Emeritus or Roman Pontiff Emeritus.”
Lombardi said Benedict would continue to wear a white cassock but without the mozzetta, the short cape that covers the shoulders. The pope’s fisherman’s ring would be replaced by a ring from his time as cardinal. The red shoes would go as well, Lombardi said, and be replaced by a pair of brown ones.
“The city of León is known for beautiful shoes, and very comfortable shoes. And when the pope was asked what he wanted to wear he said, ‘I want the shoes from León in Mexico,’” Lombardi said at the press conference.
On May 2, the cardinal who designed Benedict’s coat of arms in 2005 told CNA that he had written the pope emeritus suggesting that his coat of arms would need to be redesigned to reflect his new status. Cardinal Andrea Cordero Lanza di Montezemolo proposed making the keys of St. Peter smaller and less prominent.
“That shows that he had a historic possession but not a current jurisdiction,” said the cardinal at the time.
Benedict, however, it seems, politely declined a new coat of arms. La Stampa reported the following year that the Vatican Publishing House’s manual of ecclesiastical heraldry in the Catholic Church contained the following note:
“Expressing deep appreciation and heartfelt gratitude to the author for the interesting study sent to him, [Benedict] made it known that he prefers not to adopt an expressive heraldic emblem of the new situation created with his renouncing of the Petrine Ministry.”
By his decision to continue to dress in white like the pope, retain the title of pope, and keep the coat of arms of his papacy, Benedict revealed that in giving up the “active exercise of the ministry,” he was not forsaking the role of pope altogether.
Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI pray together at the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo March 23, 2013, their first meeting after Francis’ election. Vatican Media
An expanded Petrine ministry
In his 2013 announcement, Benedict clearly expressed his intention to step aside, even determining the date and time of his official departure. Nonetheless, his decision to keep the title of pope and maintain the ceremonial protocol that goes along with the papacy led some to speculate whether there were not actually “two popes.”
Benedict’s personal secretary and closest confidante, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, sought to clear up any confusion in 2016.
In a speech at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome on May 20, 2016, Gänswein said that Pope Francis and Benedict are not two popes “in competition” with one another but represent one “expanded” Petrine office with “an active member” and a “contemplative.”
Parsing Benedict’s speech, Gänswein explained that in stepping down, Benedict was not giving up his ministry.
“The key word in that statement is ‘munus petrinum,’ translated — as happens most of the time — with ‘Petrine ministry.’ And yet, ‘munus,’ in Latin, has a multiplicity of meanings: It can mean service, duty, guide, or gift, even prodigy. Before and after his resignation, Benedict understood and understands his task as participation in such a ‘Petrine ministry [munus],’” Gänswein said.
“He left the papal throne and yet, with the step he took on Feb. 11, 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, saying the latter scenario was something “quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.”
Benedict himself later made clear in an interview with his biographer Peter Seewald that he saw himself as continuing in his ministry. He said that a pope who steps down is like a father whose role changes, but always remains a father.
“Of course a father does not stop being father, but he is relieved of concrete responsibility. He remains a father in a deep, inward sense, in a particular relationship which has responsibility, but not with day-to-day tasks as such. It was also this way for bishops,” Benedict said.
“I think it is also clear that the pope is no superman and his mere existence is not sufficient to conduct his role, rather he likewise exercises a function.
“If he steps down, he remains in an inner sense within the responsibility he took on, but not in the function. In this respect one comes to understand that the office of the pope has lost none of its greatness, even if the humanity of the office is perhaps becoming more clearly evident,” Benedict said.
Benedict’s decision “not to abandon his ministry” inspired a cottage industry of conspiracy theories, with some questioning whether the pope emeritus truly stepped down because of his age and frailty.
George Weigel, author of the definitive biography of St. John Paul II, “Witness to Hope,” dismissed such speculation in an interview with CNA.
“I have no reason to think that there was anything more to Pope Benedict’s resignation than what he said was its cause: his conviction that he no longer had the strength, physical and intellectual, to give the Church what it needed from a pope,” he said.
“Everything else written about this is sheer speculation. Let’s take Benedict at his word,” Weigel said.
A life of prayer
In retiring to live in the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens, Benedict did not completely withdraw from the world. He attended public events in his new capacity as pope emeritus, received visitors, and pursued a life of fruitful study, writing, and prayer.
Pope Francis visits Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI at the Mater Ecclesiae monastery in Vatican City to exchange Christmas greetings Dec. 23, 2013. Vatican Media
Matthew Bunson, Catholic historian, author, and executive editor of EWTN News, told CNA that Benedict was determined not to exercise authority in his new role.
“He really embraced what it means to be pope emeritus, and refrained from making public comments, to instead live a life of prayer and reflection,” Bunson said.
“Benedict really was on retreat, and in prayer,” he said, “and that means we have his prayer for us as a Church.”
While becoming increasingly frail, Benedict continued to celebrate Mass daily with the other residents of the monastery and was known to enjoy spending time in the Vatican Gardens praying his daily rosary.
In the fall of 2021, more than eight years after Benedict stepped down, his private secretary, Gänswein, told Domradio in Cologne, Germany, that Benedict was “stable in his frailty.”
He described the pope emeritus as very weak physically but still clear in mind. Gänswein said he had not lost his “typical Bavarian humor.”
The meaning of Benedict’s renunciation for future popes
In 2013, after Benedict announced that he would step down as pope, Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda, a Jesuit theologian and canonist chosen by Pope Francis to be a cardinal, wrote an essay on what should happen when a pope steps down.
In the article, published in Civiltà Cattolica, Ghirlanda suggested the retiring Benedict take the title bishop emeritus of Rome.
“It is evident that the pope who has resigned is no longer pope; therefore he no longer has any power in the Church and cannot interfere in any government affair. One may wonder what title Benedict XVI will retain. We think that he should be given the title of bishop emeritus of Rome, like any other diocesan bishop who ceases,” he said.
In December 2021, at a congress on papal resignations, Ghirlanda took up the theme again.
“Having two people with the title of ‘pope,’ even if one added ’emeritus,’ it cannot be said that this might not generate confusion in public opinion,” he said.
To make clear that the pope who resigns is no longer pope, he said, he should perhaps be called “former Roman pontiff” or “former supreme pontiff.”
Pope Francis in July 2022 told reporters that if he were to retire from the papacy he would do things differently from his predecessor.
“The first experience went very well,” Pope Francis said, because Benedict XVI “is a holy and discreet man.”
In the future, however, “it would be better to define things or explain them better,” the pontiff added.
“I am the bishop of Rome. In that case I would be the bishop emeritus of Rome,” he said, and then suggested he would live in St. John Lateran Palace rather than at the Vatican.
Brussels, Belgium, Jun 25, 2021 / 13:00 pm (CNA).
A pro-life leader has said that a report alleging that “religious extremists” are seeking “to roll back human rights in sexuality and reproduction” in Europe should sp… […]
Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Alex Schadenberg speaks with “EWTN News Nightly” Host Tracy Sabol on Feb. 13, 2024. / Credit: “EWTN News Nightly”
CNA Staff, Feb 14, 2024 / 15:30 pm (CNA).
The director of the Euthanasia… […]
9 Comments
How sad and disturbing. What is the next thing the secular state will “ask” of the church leaders?? They will find its a slippery slope. I understand in the US there is concern that Catholic schools will be “forced” to hire those not in compliance with Catholic sexual morality as teachers -like those who are trans, gay, etc. There is no such thing as “forcing”….. there is only knuckling under to secular demands for fear of the alternative.Refuse, or close the schools. Ditto to catholic hospitals forced to “accommodate” abortion. The church is there to teach religion and morality. It is not there as a social justice enforcement arm. This is a disgrace. The burden of watching your health belongs to YOU. Period.
So much for the separation of Church and state. I guess the Church is now kneeling to the government god now…so sad and pathetic! Wearing a mask and being forced to be vaxxed before entering the Church is an insult to God….the sooner people realize this, the better it will be for everyone.
Since the vaccinated can both contract and pass the virus to others, this makes absolutely no sense. Unvaccinated people are likely the ones taking more precautions and not acting as if the world has returned to normal.
I cannot understand this idea that the vaccine protects you individually while protecting others at the same time. Omicron has certainly proved that idea false. Vaccinated or unvaccinated you can get and give it. While this is happening, the U.S. Federal Government is holding back the distribution of therapeutics that have been helpful in combating the virus in those that are sick. Their answer, lockdown, wear a mask and get vaccinated; their answer now as Omicron rages on, there is no answer!
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada diocese would not allow unvaxed to attend Christmas Eve mass. A soloist who sings every Saturday night was not allowed to attend in virden mb. I was also excluded but noted they still cashed my cheque. The hypocrisy is unbelievable !!
Here in my area of Combermere, Ontario in Canada wearing a mask to attend any services in the Catholic church has been mandatory for the last two years. We are asked to disinfect our hands, sign a “contact tracing” form and social distance six feet. My interpretation of the “and/or” means that if you are not inoculated but are willing to wear a mask, you are eligible to attend. I don’t see the issue.
Three years ago, everybody understood that hand sanitizers were antiBACTERIAL, not antiVIRAL, and excessive use risked creating superbugs and the astringent properties of triclosan could produce eczema like symptoms.
How sad and disturbing. What is the next thing the secular state will “ask” of the church leaders?? They will find its a slippery slope. I understand in the US there is concern that Catholic schools will be “forced” to hire those not in compliance with Catholic sexual morality as teachers -like those who are trans, gay, etc. There is no such thing as “forcing”….. there is only knuckling under to secular demands for fear of the alternative.Refuse, or close the schools. Ditto to catholic hospitals forced to “accommodate” abortion. The church is there to teach religion and morality. It is not there as a social justice enforcement arm. This is a disgrace. The burden of watching your health belongs to YOU. Period.
Would that our Bishops and priests feared God more than they feared secular society, the MSM, or twitter.
So much for the separation of Church and state. I guess the Church is now kneeling to the government god now…so sad and pathetic! Wearing a mask and being forced to be vaxxed before entering the Church is an insult to God….the sooner people realize this, the better it will be for everyone.
Since the vaccinated can both contract and pass the virus to others, this makes absolutely no sense. Unvaccinated people are likely the ones taking more precautions and not acting as if the world has returned to normal.
I cannot understand this idea that the vaccine protects you individually while protecting others at the same time. Omicron has certainly proved that idea false. Vaccinated or unvaccinated you can get and give it. While this is happening, the U.S. Federal Government is holding back the distribution of therapeutics that have been helpful in combating the virus in those that are sick. Their answer, lockdown, wear a mask and get vaccinated; their answer now as Omicron rages on, there is no answer!
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada diocese would not allow unvaxed to attend Christmas Eve mass. A soloist who sings every Saturday night was not allowed to attend in virden mb. I was also excluded but noted they still cashed my cheque. The hypocrisy is unbelievable !!
Here in my area of Combermere, Ontario in Canada wearing a mask to attend any services in the Catholic church has been mandatory for the last two years. We are asked to disinfect our hands, sign a “contact tracing” form and social distance six feet. My interpretation of the “and/or” means that if you are not inoculated but are willing to wear a mask, you are eligible to attend. I don’t see the issue.
Hmmm. Apparently God is only in charge of things in the macroscopic world.
When it comes to coronaviruses and O2 levels and spike proteins and such, we’re on our own.
Three years ago, everybody understood that hand sanitizers were antiBACTERIAL, not antiVIRAL, and excessive use risked creating superbugs and the astringent properties of triclosan could produce eczema like symptoms.
Why not just wear crystals?