Denver Newsroom, Apr 29, 2022 / 16:55 pm (CNA).
An emeritus Texas bishop has called on his fellow bishops to take action after President Biden’s proposed 2023 budget removed protections that prohibit federal funding for abortion.
“If abortion is really the preeminent life issues as we bishops say it is, then we must hold President Biden accountable for his pro-abortion extremism, calling out Biden in a proper pastoral manner, for his anti-Catholic pro-abortion policies,” Bishop Michael D. Pfeifer, O.M.I., Bishop Emeritus of San Angelo, wrote in a response to the Biden administration’s 2023 proposed budget, which does not include the Hyde Amendment.
First introduced in 1976, the once-bipartisan Hyde Amendment prohibits federal funding from going toward abortion, with the exceptions of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. The budget provision or rider, approved annually by Congress, largely impacts Medicaid recipients.
A growing number of Democrats have called for an end to the Hyde Amendment, even as polls continue to find a majority of Americans oppose the use of taxpayer dollars to pay for abortion. After decades of backing Hyde, Biden, the second Catholic president in U.S. history, switched his position while running for election. Biden had not included the Hyde Amendment in his 2022 budget request, a move condemned by the U.S. bishops.
In his April 22 statement Pfeifer, who was Bishop of San Angelo from 1985 to 2013, pointed out (and pro-life estimates confirm) that Hyde has saved around 2.5 million babies from abortion.
“We bishops need to speak out and act more forcefully in defense of all human life but especially the life of the unborn child in the womb,” Pfeifer said. “This requires more effective dialogue and engagement with all public officials, especially Catholic public officials.”
He expressed hope that the president could change course.
“I hope that this statement will inspire our president and his administration to not fund the terrible evil of abortion in the planned budget for 2023,” Pfeifer told CNA. “And, I hope my comments about how the decision on Roe v. Wade was made, will lead now for this decision to be overturned.”
In his statement, Pfeifer encouraged the Supreme Court to overturn its 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide, when it decides Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization later this year.
“We need to remember and take action from what the Supreme Court admitted in Roe v. Wade: ‘if … personhood (for the unborn) is established the appellant case of course collapses for the fetus right to life is then guaranteed by the 14th Amendment,’” Pfeifer wrote, citing the decision.
The appellant’s case for abortion, he said, has since collapsed.
“Since science is now totally clear that human life begins at conception when a new human being is formed, so our courts and government and the American people must now oppose abortion on demand and insist that the unborn innocent life is to be protected especially when it is most defenseless,” he said.
Pfeifer highlighted one way bishops are working toward a culture of life: Walking with Moms in Need, a program by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, encourages Catholics to support and “walk in the shoes” of local pregnant and parenting women in difficult situations.
The bishops, he said, “need to clearly state that we exhort our president and legislators, all people, to prioritize the well-being of women, children and families with both material resources and personal accompaniment so that no woman ever feels forced to choose between her future and the life of her child.”
He urged the Biden administration to fund only programs and approve policies that recognize the dignity and sanctity of human life.
“Taxpayer funding abortion represents a serious failure to serve women in their maternity by funding despair and death instead of hope and life,” he wrote.
He cited Pope Francis calling abortion murder, and quoted the pontiff’s 2019 appeal to politicians “to treat the defense of the lives of those who are about to be born and enter into society as the cornerstone of the common good.”
Pfeifer recognized abortion — “the direct killing of the unborn” — as the “antithesis of healthcare” for both the mother and her unborn child. He called prayer “central” to overturning Roe, blocking funding for abortion, and working toward a culture of life.
Bishop Michael D. Pfeifer, O.M.I., Bishop Emeritus of San Angelo, releases a new pro-life pastoral statement.
“The Biden Administration 2023 Budget targets the Hyde Amendment and other limits on taxpayers funding abortion.”
Read the full text here: pic.twitter.com/ycdFBLUIYx
— Katie Yoder (@k_yoder) April 29, 2022
Church teaching on abortion
The Catholic Church condemns abortion in the strongest possible terms. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, which summarizes Church teaching, recognizes the inherent dignity and worth of the unborn human person and considers abortion a “crime against human life.”
“Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception,” the catechism reads. “From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person — among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.”
At the same time, the Church emphasizes mercy and forgiveness for women who have obtained abortions.
“The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy,” the catechism says, but instead “makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.”
In his 1995 encyclical Evangelium Vitae, which Pfeifer cites, St. John Paul II addressed abortion in light of politics.
“I repeat once more that a law which violates an innocent person’s natural right to life is unjust and, as such, is not valid as a law,” he wrote. “For this reason I urgently appeal once more to all political leaders not to pass laws which, by disregarding the dignity of the person, undermine the very fabric of society.”
The “Church encourages political leaders, starting with those who are Christians, not to give in, but to make those choices which, taking into account what is realistically attainable, will lead to the re- establishment of a just order in the defence and promotion of the value of life,” he added.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith discussed the late pontiff’s teaching in its 2002 doctrinal note on “The Participation of Catholics in Political Life.”
“John Paul II, continuing the constant teaching of the Church, has reiterated many times that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a grave and clear obligation to oppose any law that attacks human life,” it read. “For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
May almighty God bless Bishop Michael Pfeifer, OMI, for his very profound, concise and timely pastoral letter, so necessary in these times when all falsehoods seem to run amok, without impediment and bringing so many souls in our once good United States of America into darkness and, ultimately, perdition. He is a voice of God. Listen to him.
“Catholic Bishops must hold Biden accountable for pro-abortion extremism”.
It sounds great and I definitely agree with it, but what, exactly, does it mean? IMO unless they ALL agree to deny him Holy Communion, and there’s not much chance of that happening, it means basically nothing.
That being said, I’m glad he said it and thank him for it.
“Glad he said it”: Russian folk literature offers a relevant proverb that will outlive the malignant dark side of our present moment: “One word of truth outweighs the whole world.”
Addendum – By their numerous pro-abortion actions going on now for YEARS it is obvious that Biden, Pelosi, Dieu, and the numerous other ‘catholic’ politicians who support abortion have effectively excommunicated themselves. The fact that they continue to present themselves for Holy Communion is something that they will have to answer for when their time comes. The fact that the Bishops who maintain their silence and continue to let them get away with it is something for which they will have to answer.
Where does that leave us?
Sure, Catholic bishops must hold Biden accountable for ‘pro-abortion extremism’.
How about Catholic voters?
Sadly, the Bishops mainly appear to be concerned with “getting by” with no controversy, and making nice to those whose opinions should not matter, that is, those politicians who promote abortion. Catholics in the pews continue to vote Democrat ( who represent almost all pro-abortion types)because nobody EVER speaks to them of the morality of giving your vote to those who actively violate church law and give scandal.In failing to provide Catholics in the pews with BLUNT,clear, straight-forward talk, they are failing in their roles as Bishops and leaders of the faithful. This sadly includes the Pope. He seems more invested, as do many , in promoting the importance of a “no mean tweets” posture over the importance of church morality and law. A Pope with a more orthodox outlook, when the time comes, might bring about a change all the way down the line in this area.
Would Mr Pfeiffer hold the greedy accountable for the condition of the poor
Mr Pfeiffer is pro birth
“”I do not believe that just because you are opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, a child educated, a child housed. And why would I think that you don’t? Because you don’t want any tax money to go there. That’s not pro-life. That’s pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is.” Sr. Joan Chittister
A Bishop should be appointed for a 10 year term after that he reverts to the role of priest serving in a poor parish
“Would Mr Pfeiffer hold the greedy accountable for the condition of the poor[?]”
And would you stop beating your wife if you knew others might find out? (It’s a rhetorical point–I’m not actually accusing you of domestic abuse.)
“In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, a child educated, a child housed.”
This is what I call the “Jimmy Carter ‘Argument'” (in case you have to guess, that’s not a compliment). Sad to see Sister Chittister resort to it, but she and Carter are, I suspect, deeply compatible on all sorts of shallow levels. Carter, for example, once wrote: “Many pro-life activists do not extend their concern to the baby who is born …” On what does he base this vague assertion?
My own experience is that the average pro-life person is very concerned what happens to the baby after birth; I know numerous pro-lifers who have adopted many children who might otherwise have been aborted; in some cases, they have experienced all sorts of frustration, red tape, financial costs, and emotional trials (even court trials). Frankly, the Carter/Chittister Claim is a way to carry water for the culture of death while casting shade on a huge group of people that cannot be easily boxed into the ridiculous “pro-birth but not pro-life” package.
By the way, I’m opposed to rape and domestic violence. Does the fact that I’m not able to offer professional care and hours of counseling to those who have been raped or beaten mean that I’m a hypocrite or don’t give a damn about them? Even if my inability is due in large part because I’m raising and parenting children who were adopted and might have been aborted?
NB that bishop Pfeifer is retired. Joe Biden is not merely “pro-choice.” He supports the right to kill a child right up to the moment of birth, public financing of the crime, promotion of it abroad and denial of exemption conscience protections to healthcare workers who don’t want to be complicit in murder. Yet, our second Catholic president is allowed to receive the Eucharist anytime he chooses in Washington and prances around calling himself devout. The pope and cardinal of Washington DC dote on him, clearly favored him in last election and will support him if he runs again in two years. “Scandalous” is a word used so often (and appropriately) to describe what is going on in the Church that perhaps it has lost some of its effect. What can language is there that conveys the depth of the evil that afflicts our Church today?