Austin, Texas, Jan 13, 2020 / 04:18 pm (CNA).- Texas’ 16 Catholic bishops on Friday responded to Governor Greg Abbott’s announcement that the state will not participate in the federal refugee resettlement program, calling the decision “deeply discouraging and disheartening.”
“While the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops respects the governor, this decision is simply misguided. It denies people who are fleeing persecution, including religious persecution, from being able to bring their gifts and talents to our state and contribute to the general common good of all Texans,” the bishops said in a Jan. 10 joint statement.
“As Catholics, an essential aspect of our faith is to welcome the stranger and care for the alien. We use this occasion to commit ourselves even more ardently to work with all people of good will, including our federal, state and local governments, to help refugees integrate and become productive members of our communities.”
Several of the bishops, including Edward Burns of Dallas, noted that Catholic Charities agencies in their dioceses have partnered for years with the federal government to resettle refugees, all of whom have been screened and approved for resettlement by the Department of Homeland Security.
Abbott informed the U.S. State Department Jan. 10 that Texas will not participate in the refugee resettlement program this fiscal year, the Texas Tribune reported. Texas is the first state this year to opt out of the program; more than 40 other state governors have already chosen to opt in, the Texas Tribune reports.
Abbott acknowledged in his letter to the State Department that refugees could still settle in Texas after first arriving in another state that does participate in the resettlement program.
Several Texas bishops also released their own statements on the matter.
Bishop Michael Olson of Fort Worth Jan. 10 echoed the joint statement by noting that refugees are those who have fled life-threatening situations at home, and who have been vetted by the federal government. Many, he said, are Christians fleeing religious persecution.
Olson said current local refugee support services will continue to help refugees in Texas, and if Abbott does not reverse his decision those agencies will have to use local funds to replace lost federal refugee funds.
Bishop Daniel Flores of Brownsville wrote on Twitter Jan. 10 that “the Governor’s decision not to allow the Federal refugee resettlement program to operate in Texas affects refugees vetted by the current administration. They flee violence & persecution, and seek a chance to live, work & contribute in peace. The Governor should reconsider.”
Archbishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller of San Antonio also expressed on Twitter opposition to Abbott’s decision.
Abbott’s veto of the resettlement program was made possible by a September executive order by President Trump which requires written consent from states and local entities before they resettle refugees within their boundaries, the Tribune reports. A federal judge in Maryland is expected to rule this week on whether Trump exceeded his authority with the executive order, the New York Times reports.
The Tribune reports that Texas had been a national leader in resettlement for several years after reaching a high of about 8,212 people in 2009. The number remained around 7,500 from 2012-2016, and in 2016 the governor sued the Obama administration in an effort to prevent Syrian refugees from resettling in Texas.
Despite this, and despite Abbott’s subsequent withdrawal of the state from the resettlement program, local agencies continued to resettle refugees in Texas, which accepted about 1,700 refugees during FY 2018— more than any other state— and about 2,460 in FY2019, the Tribune reports.
[…]
No offense, but who installed this “security system” for this church? The three stooges? These people had time to do NOISY wreckage in both the church and the Sacristy, cutting through metal to get the tabernacle, decapitating statues in the church, somehow opening a safe in the sacristy, yet NOBODY heard them? How, in fact, did they manage to even enter the church?? How is the security system monitored and WHERE was it located such that the thieves were able to make off with vital components which could have been used to identify them? . The monitor and its films should have been elsewhere in the church facility, in the rectory or church offices separate from the church itself. There should have been an electric eye in front of the tabernacle and possibly at all entrances of the church so that an AUTOMATIC alarm would be sent to a central monitoring station allowing police to be summoned immediately. Even my modest home has such a system. The tabernacle was worth $2 million but adequate protection was not deemed necessary? Not to mention the value of the tabernacle as a HOLY object to believers, which is to say it’s priceless. . I hope the tabernacle is recovered but I also hope that whoever is in charge of this parish has the smarts to get a more adept security company to do a PROPER job of protecting this church. Clergy need to wake up to the fact that life is not as it was, when even thieves had a certain element of respect. We no longer have that attitude in play and must act accordingly to protect objects of sacred value.
Absolutely right, LJ.
Our bishops, our pastors and our parishioners all need to realize that we Catholics are being persecuted.
These security measures are not rocket science. As you point out, many prudential home owners are undertaking them themselves.
Perhaps a first step might be to stop voting for candidates of the political party that is persecuting us?
Huh, Catholics? What do you say?
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the MSM to notice, much less, condemn these anti-Catholic incidents.