
Denver Newsroom, Sep 15, 2020 / 04:54 pm (CNA).- Catholic aid groups are expressing disappointment at a recent court decision that furthers the end of temporary protected status for immigrants from certain countries, saying that ending TPS will likely lead to the separation of thousands of families.
The 9th Circuit Appeals Court ruled Sept. 14 that the Trump administration can end the TPS program, which affects several hundred thousand immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan, many of whom have children who are American citizens.
TPS is an immigration benefit that allows persons who are unable to return safely to their home countries because of armed conflict, other violence, natural disasters, or other extraordinary conditions to remain in the United States while the situation in their home country resolves. It protects them from deportation and grants them permission to work.
“We urge the administration and Congress to find solutions that help families affected by TPS to remain together in the United States,” Catholic Charities USA said in a Sept. 15 statement.
“More than 270,000 U.S citizens have parents with TPS. If appeals are not granted, this decision will likely lead to more family separations within our borders.”
Since Congress established temporary protected status in 1990, U.S. immigrants with the designation from countries suffering natural disasters, armed conflict, or other major problems are not deported. There are about 200,000 Salvadorans, 50,000 Haitians, 2,500 Nicaraguans and 1,000 Sudanese in the United States who have temporary protected status.
The Trump administration had terminated the TPS designations of El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua and Sudan in 2017 and 2018. The administration said the residents from the four countries no longer merited TPS, arguing that natural disasters from years previously should not continue to justify irregular residency.
At the time, U.S. bishops from California and Texas spoke out about the DHS decision. Bishop Joe Vásquez of Austin, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ migration committee, called the decision “heartbreaking.” Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles called for a permanent path to residency and citizenship for the affected families.
The Haitian population with protected status arrived in the U.S. after a 2010 earthquake killed 200,000 and displaced 1 million people. In addition, the landfall of Hurricane Matthew in 2016 destroyed much of the island’s infrastructure.
Beth Caroll, Head of Programs for Catholic Relief Services in Haiti, told CNA that conditions in Haiti remain dire, and the country’s problems would be greatly compounded if 50,000 people return there from the US.
Hurricane Laura, which passed over Haiti as a tropical storm in late August, caused extensive damage and loss of life on the island, and recovery efforts are still underway.
Compounding Haiti’s already poor economy, the coronavirus pandemic has caused a major economic hit to the country.
Catholic leaders in Haiti have been warning that the combination of economic woes, the pandemic, and natural disasters make this a “terrible time” to be considering an influx of 50,000 Haitians back to the island, Carroll said, especially since so many of those immigrants now consider the United States their home.
Another effect of so many Haitians leaving the US would be a loss of remittances from the US to families in Haiti, which by some estimates makes up nearly 34% of Haiti’s income, one of the highest percentages in the world.
A large influx of returning Haitians would likely frustrate the country’s efforts to manage the coronavirus pandemic, Carroll said. In addition, many of those returning would likely have difficulty finding work.
Nobody wants to leave their family or home, Carroll noted, and the Haitians who left the island in 2010 left out of necessity, because of root causes— in this case the earthquake— in Haiti.
Carroll said CRS remains committed to addressing those root causes in Haiti through humanitarian aid, with the goal of keeping Haitians from having to leave their home again.
The rejection of TPS for Haitians was “a sad decision,” Archbishop Silvano Tomasi told CNA in November 2017. Haitians “cannot go back to a situation that still is very difficult,” said Tomasi, who has served as the Holy See’s Permanent Observer to the United Nations in Geneva and as a counselor for the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development.
In April 2018 a group of Salvadoran bishops and other Church officials visited the U.S. and asked the Trump administration to reconsider its decision ending the protected status for Salvadorans, who received TPS status after a massive earthquake in 2001.
The situation in El Salvador is still dangerous due to gang violence and severe poverty, they said. It is unsafe for people to live in the country and there are very few employment opportunities.
The influx of people returning to El Salvador from the United States could overwhelm the already-fragile economy, they warned. Additionally, many Salvadorans living in the United States send remittances to El Salvador, which provides a boost to their economy. These remittances would end if they were forced to leave.
The administration has extended the validity of work permits for El Salvadorans with TPS through Jan. 4, 2021, and has said that Salvadorans will have one additional year after the end of TPS-related lawsuits to return to their home country.

[…]
Typical of homosexuals (98+ percent), he was also pro-abortion. It could frequently be comical the way he would dodge a direct question on the matter, immediately going into the other-issuses-too mode. When he once held a “listening session” of women in his diocese open to the press expecting all the usual griping about female ordination and evil patriarchy, etc…, he instead got a bunch of women speaking of their pride that the Church defended the unborn. Weakland was embarrassed and apologized to the press that so many women “not representing true women’s concerns” showed up. God have mercy on his soul.
The damage Weakland did to the archdiocese of Milwaukee and the wider Church was incalculable. He was an open dissenter and heretic long before his homosexuality was confirmed (although, let’s face it, everyone knew). His personal vindictiveness very much resembles that of Cupich. The largely admirable record of Pope John Paul II was seriously stained by allowing this monster to remain in a position of power for those many years. Archbishop Listecki likewise disgraces himself by whitewashing Weakland’s record and career with this undeserved and dishonest tribute.
That he confessed his sins is what God wants us to do. The Lord asks us for obedience or confession. We know the better path.
1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
James 5:16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working.
John 20:23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.”
Matthew 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
1 Peter 3:21 Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
The Lord is merciful and remembers we are only flesh. We find our salvation in the God of Jacob, praise His holy and righteous name. Lord Jesus you have redeemed us and we are eternally grateful.
I hope that Weakland made a full and sincere confession. If he publicly repented of his very public sins, I didn’t hear about it. Even after he was fully exposed, he resorted to lies and seIf-justification and remained defiant.
If the Church is to ever renew itself, a direct reckoning with the myriad scandals that the hierarchy (e.g. Weakland) has inflicted or has allowed to be inflicted (e.g. the pre-Francis Vatican on it, must occur. The statement release by Listecki does just the opposite by lauding a man who did so much evil while his superiors, who should have stopped him quickly, neglected to do their duty.
By all accounts, Weakland was notorious prior to being named bishop of Milwaukee. While I have no special knowledge of what it was like there in 1977, it is probably safe to say that the diocese was reeling from what was unleashed on the Church and society in the wake of the 1960s. Appointing someone with a reputation like his should have been unthinkable. Allowing him to reign for twenty-five years while he busied himself very openly in every manner of heresy and destruction was inexcusable. Portraying him in positive light on his passing is an insult to all those who suffered as a result of his misdeeds.
Thank you for your insight. It is sad and yet, I also pray he repented.