ACI Prensa Staff, Dec 27, 2023 / 17:00 pm (CNA).
The prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, commenting on the reluctance expressed by individual bishops and bishops’ conferences regarding the declaration Fiducia Supplicans, stated that “it’s proper for each local bishop to make that discernment.”
The declaration from the DDF establishes a distinction between liturgical blessings and those of an informal nature and encourages the blessing of persons in “irregular situations” and “same-sex couples” considering that, carried out with certain precautions, they should not be confused with approval of conduct or circumstances contrary to doctrine.
In an interview published in the Spanish newspaper ABC, Fernández responded to the criticism and divergent opinions expressed by other cardinals, bishops, and bishops’ conferences, assuring that “if the text is read with an even disposition, it can be seen that it supports with great clarity and simplicity the perennial Catholic teaching on marriage and sexuality.”
The cardinal stressed that the critics of Fiducia Supplicans “cannot disagree with that doctrine,” noting that in his understanding, the objections to the document have to do with “the impropriety of giving blessings in their regional contexts that easily would be confused with a legitimation of an irregular union.”
Especially in Africa, where “there is legislation that penalizes with prison the mere fact of declaring oneself to be gay, imagine [what a] a blessing [would do],” the DDF doctrinal chief said, adding that “it’s proper for each local bishop to make that discernment in his diocese or in any case, to give further guidance.”
Divided opinions
After the Dec. 18 publication of Fiducia Supplicans, there have been declarations from various bishops or bishops’ conferences around the world that have expressed diverse opinions.
Bishops from some nations such as Germany, Austria, and France have expressed satisfaction with the declaration, and some of them have even gone so far as to say that priests cannot refuse to impart these non-ritual blessings to persons in an irregular situation.
In other countries such as the United States, Ukraine, Ghana, Kenya, and Mexico, bishops have shown their support while warning of the difficulty of ensuring that these pastoral gestures do not lead to confusing people about a change in the doctrine on marriage and sexuality in the Catholic Church.
Along those lines, the bishop of Orihuela-Alicante in Spain, José Ignacio Munilla, noted that although the declaration is not “heretical,” its application can be “chaotic.”
The bishops of at least three countries have banned the application of Fiducia Supplicans: Kazakhstan, Malawi, and Zambia.
‘Non-ritualized blessings’ and not a ‘marriage’
Fernández told ABC that the informal or “pastoral” blessing permitted by Fiducia Supplicans does not mean, in the case of homosexual persons, “accepting a marriage, nor is it a ratification of the life they lead, nor is it an absolution. It is a simple gesture of pastoral closeness that does not have the same requirements of a sacrament.”
“We will have to get used to understanding that if a priest gives this type of simple blessing he is not a heretic, he is not ratifying anything, nor is he denying the Catholic doctrine on marriage,” the cardinal added.
Asked if this declaration is a first step toward the acceptance of homosexual behavior or equating marriage with unions between persons of the same sex, Fernández was blunt.
“That perception is totally incorrect,” the cardinal said, “and whoever says that has either not read the text or is ‘in a bad mood,’ allow me the expression. The statement states clearly and endlessly that these are non-ritualized blessings, so that they are not interpreted as a marriage.”
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
I don’t have the patience to deal with this guy.
Lord help us.
What we find here is what I criticized commenting on Papal Erasure? in Extra extra, Joseph Fletcher’s Situation Ethics. Card Fernández’ overture of orthodoxy nevertheless proposing diversity of diocesan opinion regarding Fiducia Supplicans [SP] is just that [if diversity of opinion is fine for major moral issues why can’t it be appropriate for the liturgy to wit the TLM?].
Again what’s perceived here is a finesse ruse; ruse nonetheless consistent with what Pope Francis recently said regarding SP quoting his former mentor Card Mario Martini, that we evaluate each situation according to the current need, not by prefixed dogma, what he calls inflexible ideology. That’s precisely Joseph’s Fletcher’s doctrine of situation ethics.
Finesse here is subtlety of messaging of an old heresy Situation Ethics disguised as a new paradigm revelation. If Card Tucho wishes to appear creative perhaps he should consult Marcion and Valentinus for an improved repertoire.
sfiducia psicastenia = mistrust obsession ?
FARCE: ~Oxford Language. “ORIGIN: early 16th century: from French, literally ‘stuffing’, from farcir ‘to stuff’, from Latin farcire. An earlier sense of ‘forcemeat stuffing’ became used metaphorically for comic interludes ‘stuffed’ into the texts of religious plays, which led to the current usage.”
Especially in Africa, where “there is legislation that penalizes with prison the mere fact of declaring oneself to be gay, imagine [what a] a blessing [would do],” the DDF doctrinal chief said, adding that “it’s proper for each local bishop to make that discernment in his diocese or in any case, to give further guidance.”
********
I thought we were told this wasn’t a blessing specifically about SSA “couples”? So now it’s assumed to be? And it’s inferred here that if African bishop’s reject this declaration it’s because they don’t want to expose SSA people to unwoke local laws, not because they reject the document itself as scandalous? Really?
There seems to be no acknowledgement from Rome that the Global South hasn’t lost their sense of Christian decency, or that they refuse to be in lockstep with the West’s moral decline.
Interview with The Pillar: “Obviously, when there is a text signed by the pope, in order to interpret it broadly, the bishops must first study it in depth and without haste, and allow themselves to be enlightened and enriched by that text. Therefore, prudence and attention to local culture could admit different ways of application, but not a total denial of this step being asked of priests.”
Interview with ABC: “Especially in Africa, where “there is legislation that penalizes with prison the mere fact of declaring oneself to be gay, imagine [what a] a blessing [would do],” the DDF doctrinal chief said, adding that “it’s proper for each local bishop to make that discernment in his diocese or in any case, to give further guidance.”
In one interview, it is stated that each local bishop can “make that discernment,” and in another interview, it is stated that there cannot be “a total denial of this step being asked of priests.”
But that is exactly what is happening in many places: a total denial. Now what?