CNA Staff, Jan 24, 2024 / 16:45 pm (CNA).
Residents of Massachusetts and New York are being urged by pro-life leaders and Catholic bishops to raise their voices against upcoming legislation that would legalize assisted suicide.
In New York, the “Medical Aid in Dying Act” would allow a terminally ill patient to request medication that would put an end to his life.
“A written request for medication … shall be signed and dated by the patient and witnessed by at least two adults who, in the presence of the patient, attest that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, the patient has decision-making capacity, is acting voluntarily, is making the request for medication of his or her own volition, and is not being coerced to sign the request,” the bill says.
The New York State Catholic Conference, which opposed the bill the past two legislative sessions, put out a call to action following the start of the 2024 legislative session on Jan. 3.
“With the 2024 legislative session underway, advocates and the bill sponsors of physician-assisted suicide are pushing hard for a vote to legalize this deadly practice in New York state,” the website says.
“Lawmakers need to hear from their constituents if we hope to avoid yet another assault on human life here. Assisted suicide is dangerous for patients, caregivers, and vulnerable populations such as the elderly and people with disabilities,” the statement says.
“Suicide is not medical care. Please tell your state Senate and Assembly representatives that you oppose this dangerous and deadly practice. Contact your state legislators now!”
New Yorkers can write to their state legislators through the New York State Catholic Conference web page here.
The identical bills in the Assembly and the Senate, which were introduced in January of last year, are still under committee review and have not reached the floor for a vote yet.
In the Bay State, the Massachusetts “End of Life Options Act” says that “a terminally ill patient may voluntarily make an oral request for medical aid in dying and a prescription for medication” if the patient is a “mentally capable adult,” a resident of Massachusetts, and has been determined by a physician to be terminally ill.
The act was brought before both the House and the Senate in identical bills in February 2023.
Massachusetts Citizens for Life (MCFL) in an email Wednesday urged supporters to voice their opinions against the bill by submitting testimony to state representatives and senators.
MCFL said in the email that the legislation raises “serious societal concerns” including ethical problems that “legalization may lead physicians to violate the Hippocratic Oath.”
The bill also could become a “slippery slope,” MCFL said, adding that “it invites a broader acceptance of euthanasia, eroding moral and legal boundaries.”
MCFL said the bill has “inadequate safeguards” that could lead to abuse and added that the legislation could impact “vulnerable populations” such as the disabled and those with limited health care access.
“The bill clashes with cultural, religious, and philosophical beliefs against intentionally ending human life,” the email said.
The legislation was the subject of a bicameral legislative hearing in October 2023 but never reached the floor for a vote.
The bishops of Massachusetts, who have opposed the bill since it was first introduced in 2021, again raised their voices against the legislation ahead of the hearing last year.
“When it’s a topic of discussion amongst legislators, the Church needs to make loud and clear that our voice is heard on the issue,” Massachusetts Catholic Conference President Jim Driscoll told the Boston Pilot at the time.
“The bishops are always going to be on the side of life, including in the precious times that life is ending,” he added.
A statement put out by the conference called the bills “deeply troubling” and added that “the Catholic bishops of Massachusetts stand united in our strong opposition to physician assisted suicide.”
“It is an affront to life and a dangerous precedent for determining end-of-life issues. Physicians are trained to care for the ill, not to hasten death,” the statement said.
At the annual Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, archbishop of Boston Cardinal Sean O’Malley said: “A society that allows parents to kill their children will eventually allow children to kill their parents,” according to OSV News.
“The situation in Canada is alarming. There are proposals to promote euthanasia for the mentally ill. Once human life is no longer sacred and the government can continuously move the goalposts, more and more people are in danger,” he said.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
30 years past Washington State permitted physician assisted suicide [see Compassion in Dying v. State of Wash., 850 F. Supp. 1454 W.D. Wash. 1994] in the case of several Aids patients. 30 years since New York State has surpassed the grounds for assisted suicide permitting any diagnosed terminally ill patient to request suicide in the Medical Aid in Dying Act.
Reasons are multiple that would classify this bill as a much wider option for suicide, since it relies on medical judgment and what terminal is, and includes virtually any category of subjective opinion. Diagnostic standards have devolved since the 90s. Furthermore as mentioned here its spectrum potentially includes handicapped, the elderly. Canada has reached the level of Nazi Germany in its proposal to deliver deadly treatment to the mentally ill.
We’re deeply mired in a cultural philosophy of death, death the answer to dissatisfaction with life, death for prenascent life long the forerunner that helped shape the suicidal mentality. Tragically this death dealing putsch is not entirely driven by atheists or modern stoics, rather many are Christians who have been emotionally and spiritually anesthetized by virtue mitigating theological doctrines. We suffer a mind numbing duality of condemnation of evil parsed with the rationale for mitigating circumstances leaving us morally sedated. Bishops must be perfectly clear and relentless.