
Venice, Fla., Aug 31, 2018 / 04:52 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- One day after issuing a statement denouncing what he called the ‘defiance’ of Pope Francis by “so-called conservative Catholics”, the president of Ave Maria University revised that statement and issued a letter explaining his intent.
“I want to make very clear what my August 29th statement intends to do,” Jim Towey wrote in an Aug. 30 letter to friends of Ave Maria University.
He said his desire “is to defend Peter, not simply Francis.”
Towey noted that “the Chair of St. Peter isn’t a political office.”
Christ “gave the keys of the Church to Peter and his successors,” he wrote. “This divine institution transcends temporal affairs. The Church’s foundation depends on unity between the pope and bishops. While perfect unity is not possible to effect in a world of sinners, all of us in the Church must desire it.”
The university president said he is aware of the history of curial corruption and knows “the difference between fallible persons and the underlying offices that they occupy.”
“People are entitled to their views on Pope Francis and his pontificate. My concern is with how we express our views and act upon them during this dark controversy.”
Towey said his concern “is with the prudence of the public, coordinated release” of Archbishop Viganò’s testimony.
“Can one archbishop be prosecutor, judge and jury and call for a resignation of the pope?”
Towey also defended the legitimacy of questioning “the appropriateness of airing grievances of this nature in a public manner.” He cited the 1990 instruction Donum veritatis of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which advised theologians against turning to the media when they have tensions with the Magisterium.
“What was said in the context of commentary on magisterial documents seems to apply as well as to the public criticisms of the Holy Father and his actions,” Towey wrote. “The Archbishop here publicly accused the Pope of ‘grave, disconcerting and sinful conduct’ and called for him to resign. In my view, this conduct crossed the line, and a defense of the Holy Father was merited.”
He added that “my gratuitous comment about what might have motivated Cardinal Burke’s conduct … was not merited.”
In his Aug. 29 statement, Towey had written of “the challenge to the Pope’s authority by Raymond Cardinal Burke, an American prelate who has consistently opposed the direction Pope Francis has led the Church on certain matters (and may still be smarting from the Holy Father’s decision to remove him from his prominent position as head of the Holy See’s highest ecclesiastical court).”
In his emendation of the Aug. 29 statement, the parenthetical reference to Cardinal Burke’s removal from the Apostolic Signatura was omitted.
“Such speculation was unfair and His Eminence deserved better,” Towey wrote in his Aug. 30 letter. “He has been a friend of Ave Maria University since its founding and is renowned for his sincere love of the Church. I will amend my statement on the web site, and I apologize.”
Towey said that Church unity “is vital today more than ever before,” and, referring to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, that “the Pope has primacy, and that the unity of the pope and the bishops is the very foundation of the Church.”
“You and I must work toward that unity and avoid any potential schism that might mortally wound the body of Christ,” he wrote.
Towey affirmed that the case of Archbishop McCarrick “raises troubling questions that demand answers. For the record, I support the initiative within the Church to vigorously examine the evidence. What His Eminence Cardinal DiNardo proposed seems appropriate.”
He said he grew up believing “that we should love whoever our pope is and give the benefit of the doubt to him whenever it is reasonably possible to do so. I see no reason why Pope Francis doesn’t deserve this benefit now.”
“I remain confident he will comment at the appropriate time on what has been published, and also lead the effort the Church needs to protect children and vulnerable adults from clergy sexual abuse, and hold those who perpetrate such acts or cover them up within the hierarchy, accountable. Let us all pray for him.”
Pope Francis responded Aug. 26 to a journalist’s question about Archbishop Viganò’s testimony, saying: “I read the statement this morning, and I must tell you sincerely that, I must say this, to you and all those who are interested: Read the statement carefully and make your own judgement. I will not say a single word on this. I believe the statement speaks for itself. And you have the journalistic capacity to draw your own conclusions. It’s an act of faith. When some time passes and you have drawn your conclusions, I may speak. But, I would like your professional maturity to do the work for you. It will be good for you.”
The original version of Towey’s Aug. 29 statement has been removed from Ave Maria University’s website, and has been replaced with an emended version. The original is, however, available on cached sites.
In addition to removing his parenthetical speculation about Cardinal Burke’s motivations, the updated version of Towey’s statement removed from the opening line the word “conservative” as predicated of some members of the Church hierarchy: “There is nothing new about the rift between Pope Francis and some conservative members of the Church hierarchy” in the original now reads “There is nothing new about the rift between Pope Francis and some members of the Church hierarchy.”
The emended version of the statement continues to refer twice to “conservative Catholics”, once to “so-called conservative Catholics,” and it affirms the conservatism of Ave Maria University.
Towey’s letter also refers to his Aug. 24 statement regarding the crisis of clerical sexual abuse and its cover-up by Church authorities.
He wrote in his letter that the scandal “touches very close to home,” as a family member, while in high school, was abused by a seminary deacon.
Towey said the deacon was ordained a priest and “only when three women went public many years later was he removed from active ministry.”
“Five other victims came forward shortly after he was removed from parish life,” Towey wrote. “He has never acknowledged his wrongdoing to any of the victims, remains a priest to this day, and receives a monthly pension check for the 22 years he preyed on the vulnerable while wearing a Roman collar.”
“I intend to continue to press for justice in his case, and as a lay man, to participate in the reform of the Church so that priests like him are held accountable,” Towey stated.
[…]
The plot thickens…
FIRST, we’ve already heard that the Churches IN THE WEST are divided (not really “churches,” because lacking the Apostolic Succession…so therefore “ecclesial communions”). And, now the NATION-STATE coinciding more or less with the Greek Orthodox Church has jumped atop the bandwagon, or whatever. Earlier, we heard that the Orthodox Churches themselves were upset, especially from Metropolitan Hilarion from Budapest, of the Russian Orthodox Church, who expressed “great shock when he read this document.” https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2024/01/19/vatican-prefect-fiducia-supplicans-draws-some-negative-reactions-from-christian-leaders/
SECOND, and the document’s ongoing odor-of-unsanctity has forced a division within the LATIN CHURCH itself, which used to be centered in Rome (that is, a polyhedron that used to have a center?). Still with affirmation of true faith and morals from all of continental Africa, plus Poland, Hungary, Kazakhstan and Peru, and parts of France, Spain and Argentina.
THIRD, these are historic times somewhat comparable to the ARIAN HERESY which attempted to unravel the nature of the Triune God and reintroduce polytheism. Today, cometh the great unraveling of the nature of Man, instead, with a polyglot morality. Cleverly less than a direct heresy, but leading to heresy https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2024/02/does-fiducia-supplicans-affirm-heresy
FOURTH, Cardinal Fernandez’s ALMOST-HERESY was anticipated and guarded against in Veritatis Splendor whereby morality is now explicitly part of the Magisterium:
“A separation, or even an opposition, is thus established in some cases between the teaching of the precept, which is valid and general, and the norm of the individual conscience, which would in fact make the final decision [no longer a ‘moral judgment’] about what is good and what is evil. On this basis, an attempt is made to legitimize so-called ‘pastoral’ solutions [!] contrary to the teaching of the Magisterium, and to justify a ‘creative’ hermeneutic according to which the moral conscience is in no way obliged, in every case, by a particular negative precept [“Thou shalt not…!]” (Veritatis Splendor, n. 56).
AND, “This is the first time, in fact, that the MAGISTERIUM of the Church [caps added] has set forth in detail the fundamental elements of this [‘moral’] teaching, and presented the principles for the pastoral discernment necessary in practical and cultural situations which are complex and even crucial” (n. 115). “The Church is no way [!] the author or the arbiter of this [‘moral’] norm” (n. 95).
So, THEREFORE, the divisive Fernandez half-step: A “blessing” purported to not be a blessing, for irregular “couples” purported to not be couples. While Fernandez hasn’t yet crossed the line of heresy (next up, female deacons?), but he has KISSED it!
Fiducia Supplicans = Beach house grooming on Vatican letterhead.
Sure that’s where it originated from and they even had it down as an art form with older men corrupting young men as a guide to ” breaking them in”! Get ready people all of this is going to make Sodom as amateurs!!!!!
LGBT people have always existed. It didn’t “originate” anywhere.
Let’s be realistic. Almost 60% of all members of parliament and nearly 70% of all MPs who voted did so in favor. Neither of those margins are “just over a majority.” This bill was resoundingly approved by the Greek parliament. The Greek church (and every other) is not required to either perform or recognize the marriages. I suspect nothing will change all that dramatically – just like in the other 36 countries that already allow same gender couples to marry.