Harrisburg, Pa., Sep 13, 2018 / 01:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A district attorney in Pennsylvania cleared Bishop Kevin Rhoades of Fort Wayne-South Bend of any wrongdoing Thursday, and both the district attorney and the Fort Wayne diocese lamented that unnecessary harm was done to the bishop by speculation going public.
“After a full investigation, the Dauphin County District Attorney has determined that there is no basis to conclude that Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades ever engaged in a criminal or otherwise improper relationship with a person whom we will refer to as J.T.,” read a Sept. 13 statement by Francis Chardo, Dauphin County district attorney.
A cousin of J.T. (who died in 1996) had contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg saying he recalled Rhoades having travelled with J.T. when J.T. was a minor, and that he thought it was odd and was compelled to report it. Harrisburg is the seat of Dauphin County.
The suggestion of impropriety was leaked to the press.
The Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend stated that “While it’s important that allegations be brought forward, it’s equally important for due process to take place. The result of this investigation underscores the importance of allowing appropriate authorities to determine credibility of accusations before the reputation of any individual is impugned in the court of public opinion.”
Similarly, Chardo wrote that “This has been a case of a public airing of mere speculation of impropriety with no foundation. In this case, the leaking of what turned out to be an unfounded report did unnecessary harm. This has done a disservice to actual victims of sexual abuse. It has also caused significant and unnecessary harm to Bishop Rhoades.”
He encouraged “reports of any suspicion of the abuse of a child to law enforcement,” while adding that “once reports are made to proper authorities, they should be fully investigated without public speculation about guilt. Where appropriate, we will bring charges. Here, we found no evidence of wrongdoing. We now regard this case as closed.”
Bishop Rhoades, 60, was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Harrisburg in 1983. He became Bishop of Harrisburg in 204, and continued serving there until his 2009 appointment as Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend.
Chardo explained that J.T. turned 18 in July 1988, and that Rhoades had no connection to J.T.’s parish until that month, and that he “would have had no opportunity to even meet J.T. before July 1988. In fact, he did not meet J.T. until almost two years later.”
Rhoades first met J.T. in 1990 at the Dauphin County Prison, the district attorney found. J.T.’s mother had asked Rhoades to visit her son in prison. Bishop Rhoade’s recollection of events coincided with the records of the county jail, Chardo noted.
J.T. Was paroled April 6, 1990, after Rhoades told a court that J.T. could do community service at his parish.
“During the time that J.T. was doing community service and spending time at St. Francis Parish, Father Rhoades decided to make a trip to Puerto Rico,” Chardo wrote. “A friend of Father Rhoades, a teacher, who was considering the priesthood, also made the trip. Upon learning of the impending travel to Puerto Rico, J.T. asked if he could also join the trip so that he could visit his grandmother there. Father Rhoades agreed. All three men made the trip to Puerto Rico and there was no sexual or intimate contact between them. We interviewed the teacher by telephone as he lives in England … He confirmed Bishop Rhoades’ account of the trip and that there was no sexual or intimate contact between Father Rhoades and anyone else during the trip.”
J.T.’s mother was also interviewed by detectives, and she “corroborated Bishop Rhoades’ account,” confirming that the Puerto Rico trip took place when J.T. was in his 20s, and that “she never had any indication of sexual contact between J.T. and Father Rhoades.”
Chardo noted that the investigation began with a report by one of J.T.’s cousins to the Harrisburg diocese that he recalled Rhoades “had travelled with J.T. to Puerto Rico twice and South America once when J.T. was 13 or 14 years old. The cousin did not witness any sexual or unlawful acts and did not receive information relating any such acts from any source. The cousin merely thought the conduct he remembered was odd and so he felt compelled to report it. The Diocese promptly forwarded the report to the Dauphin County District Attorney.”
The district attorney noted that when he was re-interviewed, “the cousin indicated that he was not certain of the timeframe but he was sure that the contacts between J.T. and Father Rhoades occurred after 1986, based upon a milestone in his own life. He conceded that it may very well have been when J.T. was in his late teens or early twenties.”
“Based upon the records relating to Bishop Rhoades’ assignments and the interviews of Bishop Rhoades and J.T.’s mother, we have determined that Bishop Rhoades first came in contact with J.T. at the request of his mother while J.T. was an adult inmate of the Dauphin County Prison. This contact was in the context of religious outreach to an inmate to provide spiritual guidance.”
Chardo also determined that the trip to Puerto Rico “occurred when J.T. was an adult” and that “this was the only time that Bishop Rhoades travelled with J.T.”
“The report relating to multiple trips was the result of an honest, mistaken recollection and the passage of nearly three decades. All of Bishop Rhoades’ contact with J.T. was in the context of pastoral care and arose out of the recognized tradition of prison ministry.”
Chardo noted that J.T.’s name was not disclosed “because the report by a member his family was made confidentially and without the expectation that it would be publicly aired.”
He added that “no witness has alleged observing any criminal or improper conduct by Bishop Rhoades with respect to J.T., and that “Bishop Rhoades and the family of J.T. fully cooperated in the investigation.”
The Fort Wayne-South Bend diocese noted its appreciation of “the swift and thorough investigation into the unsubstantiated allegation against Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades. As anticipated, the investigation exonerated Bishop Rhoades.”
The diocese said it “stands firm in sympathy and support for all victims of child sexual abuse and encourages victims to report allegations.”
Bishop Rhoades commented, “I have offered up the pain of this difficult time for the victim survivors of child sexual abuse.”
[…]
Francis, just stay in your own diocese. You’re the bishop of Rome and not the bishop for the entire Catholic Church. Each of us has our own bishop, thank you.
Well that’s very Episcopalian.
But very true, nonetheless.
In the minds of some, the UN is like the Church. How could Francis possibly deny himself communion with like-minded adherents of “peace and prosperity for people and the planet?” The seeker may even glimpse the glory of a specific type of salvation through work on sustainable development goals.
How could Francis deny himself “communion”, whatever that means, with like-minded adherents of “peace and prosperity for people and the planet?” A “glimpse of the glory of a specific type of salvation….”
Do you mean unification with the demonic goals of the U.N. policies that promote such things as the mass murder of the unborn, which Francis has indirectly sanctioned in the past, insisting Catholics get on board with U.N. population planning policies, and their globalist tyranny advocacies that destroy the prosperity of market economies and suppresses any hope of actual meaningful salvation by instituting the false God of secular utopia and the extermination of actual religion from all human cultures? Are you aware that tyranny has been done to death in human history. And I’m not speaking metaphorically.
Clearly some minds consider the UN ‘like’ the church. I don’t believe that, and I don’t believe you believe that. Perhaps a multi-layered meaning of words tending to allusion and connotation is confusing to minds trained with empirical bent. I was speaking metaphorically, analogically.
Allow me, please: Bergoglio and his Vatican friends are only too happy to commune with UN folk and achieve sustainable development goals rather than communion with Christ, rather than sanctification and justification through the difficult sacrificial development of virtue. They apparently find it too backward and demeaning and historically passe to follow Christ and the Church Magisterium which precedes them. Bergoglio and Vatican friends are apparently not empirically minded enough to know that God will never fall or fail while they themselves may do exactly that. They may hope that hell is empty but Christ didn’t teach that.
How has tyranny been done to death? It seems that tyranny will not die so long as sinful men still live on earth.
Curious how close that is to the election…
Go for it Pope Francis!
We pray for your good health to be there!
I pray that he stays in his own diocese and attends to those matters. The Pope is a spiritual leader and not some earthly potentate.
Koekelberg, Belgium.
Hope Francis has time for a side trip to Antwerp for a little chat with Bonny on the small matter of euthanasia.
He should visit the EWTN chapel and find out he has been wrong about their mission.
In the minds of some, the UN is like the Church. How could Francis possibly deny himself communion with like-minded adherents of “peace and prosperity for people and the planet?” The seeker may even glimpse the glory of a specific type of salvation through sustainable development goals.
I wrote a prior somewhat angry response. Then it occurred to me that you might be sarcastic. If so, I apologize.
No problem. It is good to suffer a little ‘burn’ now and then.
Happy continuing Easter Season!
Well now, that would be interesting. I picture Cardinal Burke and Bishop Strickland outside… on their knees leading thousands of Catholics in a rosary for his conversion.
Maybe Biden will grant him a private audience.
They could do ice cream!
Stay home, Francis. The people who matter aren’t interested in anything you have to say at this point.
Oh boy,coming to see the Black sheep of the American Church??We English speaking Yankees aren’t His Holiness favorites!!! Maybe a slap down on another Trad Bishop will be in order.
If he comes, he comes. We can pray that he doesn’t, but that gets submitted to God’s will, and there’s nothing any of us can do about it… except welcome him with kindness, honesty, patience, and charity, and continue to pray for him.