Facade of St. Peter’s Basilica / Credit: Nils Huber / Unsplash
Rome Newsroom, Jul 14, 2024 / 08:49 am (CNA).
The Holy See has condemned acts of violence in the wake of the shooting that injured former U.S. President Donald Trump and others and left one dead at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on July 13.
A brief statement provided to CNA by Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni on July 14 said the Holy See expressed “concern about last night’s episode of violence, which wounds people and democracy, causing suffering and death.”
The comment also said the Holy See “is united to the prayer of the U.S. bishops for America, for the victims, and for peace in the country, that the motives of the violent may never prevail.”
Pope Francis did not comment on the incident during his weekly public appearance for the Angelus at noon on Sunday.
Political leaders from around the globehave spoken out against political violence and in support of democracy after the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, Saturday evening.
In astatement posted to Truth Social July 13, Trump said a bullet pierced the upper part of his right ear. After receiving treatment at a nearby hospital, the former president flew to New Jersey under Secret Service protection late Saturday night.
The FBI has identified the Trump rally shooter as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. Crooks, who carried no ID and was identified with DNA analysis, was killed by a Secret Service sniper at the rally, according to officials.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Pope Francis meets with the United States bishops at St. Matthew’s Cathedral in Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2015. / L’Osservatore Romano.
Rome Newsroom, Nov 28, 2022 / 08:01 am (CNA).
Pope Francis has emphasized the difference between bishops’ conferences and bishops in a new interview with America Magazine.
“The bishops’ conference is there to bring together the bishops, to work together, to discuss issues, to make pastoral plans. But each bishop is a pastor,” the pope said in a lengthy interview conducted at his Vatican home on Nov. 22 and published Nov. 28.
“Let us not dissolve the power of the bishop by reducing it to the power of the bishops’ conference.”
The conversation with the Jesuit publication covered a wide range of topics, including the role of bishops, racism, polarization, sexual abuse, the Vatican-China deal, and whether he has any regrets from his time as pope.
In the interview, Pope Francis was told about a 2021 America Magazine survey that found that Catholics in the United States consider the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to be the least trustworthy out of the groups listed — 20% of U.S. Catholics surveyed found the USCCB to be “very trustworthy.”
Francis was asked: “How can the U.S. Catholic bishops regain the trust of American Catholics?”
“The question is good because it speaks about the bishops,” he responded. “But I think it is misleading to speak of the relationship between Catholics and the bishops’ conference. The bishops’ conference is not the pastor; the pastor is the bishop. So one runs the risk of diminishing the authority of the bishop when you look only to the bishops’ conference.”
“Jesus did not create bishops’ conferences,” he added. “Jesus created bishops, and each bishop is pastor of his people.”
The U.S. bishops met in Baltimore for their annual fall general assembly on Nov. 14-17. Katie Yoder
Pope Francis said the emphasis should be on whether a bishop has a good relationship with his people, not on administration.
He gave the example of Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas: “I do not know if he is conservative, or if he is progressive, if he is of the right or of the left, but he is a good pastor.”
In the U.S., the pope said, there are ‘some good bishops who are more on the right, some good bishops who are more on the left, but they are more bishops than ideologues; they are more pastors than ideologues. That is the key.”
“The grace of Jesus Christ is in the relationship between the bishop and his people, his diocese,” he said.
A bishops’ conference, instead, is an organization meant to “assist and unite.”
Pope Francis was also asked whether the USCCB should prioritize the fight against abortion over other issues.
To which he said: “this is a problem the bishops’ conference has to resolve within itself.”
The pope pointed out that the activity of a bishops’ conference is on the organizational level, and in history, conferences have at times gotten things wrong.
“In other words, let this be clear: A bishops’ conference has, ordinarily, to give its opinion on faith and traditions, but above all on diocesan administration and so on,” he said, again emphasizing the sacramental nature of the pastoral relationship of a bishop to his diocese and its people.
“And this cannot be delegated to the bishops’ conference,” he added. “The conference helps to organize meetings, and these are very important; but for a bishop, [being] pastor is most important.”
In the interview, Pope Francis also denounced polarization as “not Catholic,” and said the Catholic way of dealing with sin is “not puritanical” but puts saints and sinners together.
He also said in the U.S., where there is a Catholicism particular to that country, something he called “normal,” “you also have some ideological Catholic groups.”
Pope Francis arrives at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, Sept. 23, 2015. CNA
On the topic of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, Pope Francis was asked about the apparent lack of transparency when it comes to accusations against bishops, compared with the handling of accusations against priests.
The pope called for “equal transparency” going forward, adding that “if there is less transparency, it is a mistake.”
To a question about Black Catholics, Francis said he is “aware of their suffering, that he loves them very much, and that they should resist and not walk away” from the Catholic Church.
“Racism is an intolerable sin against God,” he added. “The Church, the pastors and laypeople must continue fighting to eradicate it and for a more just world.”
Asked if he has any regrets, or if he would change anything he has done in nearly 10 years as pope, Francis said in English, as he laughed, that he would change “all! All!”
“However, I did what the Holy Spirit was telling me I had to do. And when I did not do it, I made a mistake,” he added.
On his seeming constant joyfulness, the pope said he is not “always like that,” except when he is with people.
“I would not say that I am happy because I am healthy, or because I eat well, or because I sleep well, or because I pray a great deal,” he explained. “I am happy because I feel happy, God makes me happy. I don’t have anything to blame on the Lord, not even when bad things happen to me. Nothing.”
He said the Lord has guided him through both good and difficult moments, “but there is always the assurance that one does not walk alone.”
“One has one’s faults,” he said, “also one’s sins; I go to confession every 15 days — I do not know, that is just how I am.”
Vatican City, Jan 25, 2020 / 11:15 am (CNA).- Pope Francis prayed at the tomb of St. Paul with Orthodox and Anglican leaders Saturday to conclude the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.
“God’s priority is the salvation of all,” Pope … […]
6 Comments
In a Nietzchean world awash with unstable personalities, it’s time for all of us to consider the inflammatory power of even a few words.
In Germany in 2006 Pope Benedict XVI made an academic reference to the views of 14th-century Manuel Paleologus II about violence within historic Islam (the Regensberg Lecture), and throughout the Muslim world there followed wild street demonstrations and even the likely-related killing of a nun in Egypt. On July 8, 2024 a presidential candidate is reported to have said: “it’s time to put Trump in the bulls-eye” (Associated Press, July 14, 2024)….
And, while we’re at it, what too about the polarizing consequences of clericalists airbrushing fellow Catholics as “backwardist, bigoted, rigid, fixistic and and ideological?”
It’s typical of the vague statements they issue when someone they could not care less about or even hate is attacked. They don’t name the victims or even really acknowledge that they were any. It’s similar to what they say after the latest routine murder of Nigerian Christians by Muslims. They simply deplore “violence”, but never mention “Islam.” If Biden or any leftist had been the target, you can bet that there would have been a clear condemnation of “nationalism” or “populism.” These people occupy the same moral plane as the media that adore them.
While I was eating brunch yesterday with my family, an African American couple ordered in front of us at the counter. They were very well dressed. Perhaps they just came from church? As the man went to get syrup and utensils for their pancakes, a mid-60s Caucasian man with a Midwest baseball team logo on his hat approached and said:
“Too bad the guy missed!”
The African American man looked shocked; wisely did not engage and walked away (I think it was Seneca who said: “Never talk to crazy people.”). The Caucasian boomer with the beer gut then insecurely quipped as the African American man walked away: “Hey man, I’m just saying, you know?” – as if the African American as an African American must have appreciated his murderous mindset. Then the boomer, eating alone (I wonder why?!), opened back up his laptop and entered again into the internet.
For my part, I stayed silent for the sake of my family. But I confessed in the car home that I was torn between confronting him and not engaging like African American man. What did I want to say?
“The assassin did not miss. Four were hit, including our former President, and one has died.”
Witness the culture of death. Abortion has brought us to this place. If it is acceptable to kill an inconvenient child in the womb, why not a political opponent?
In a Nietzchean world awash with unstable personalities, it’s time for all of us to consider the inflammatory power of even a few words.
In Germany in 2006 Pope Benedict XVI made an academic reference to the views of 14th-century Manuel Paleologus II about violence within historic Islam (the Regensberg Lecture), and throughout the Muslim world there followed wild street demonstrations and even the likely-related killing of a nun in Egypt. On July 8, 2024 a presidential candidate is reported to have said: “it’s time to put Trump in the bulls-eye” (Associated Press, July 14, 2024)….
And, while we’re at it, what too about the polarizing consequences of clericalists airbrushing fellow Catholics as “backwardist, bigoted, rigid, fixistic and and ideological?”
It’s typical of the vague statements they issue when someone they could not care less about or even hate is attacked. They don’t name the victims or even really acknowledge that they were any. It’s similar to what they say after the latest routine murder of Nigerian Christians by Muslims. They simply deplore “violence”, but never mention “Islam.” If Biden or any leftist had been the target, you can bet that there would have been a clear condemnation of “nationalism” or “populism.” These people occupy the same moral plane as the media that adore them.
“don’t acknowledge there were any at all.”
The Vatican’s comment sounds hollow.
Just sayin’.
While I was eating brunch yesterday with my family, an African American couple ordered in front of us at the counter. They were very well dressed. Perhaps they just came from church? As the man went to get syrup and utensils for their pancakes, a mid-60s Caucasian man with a Midwest baseball team logo on his hat approached and said:
“Too bad the guy missed!”
The African American man looked shocked; wisely did not engage and walked away (I think it was Seneca who said: “Never talk to crazy people.”). The Caucasian boomer with the beer gut then insecurely quipped as the African American man walked away: “Hey man, I’m just saying, you know?” – as if the African American as an African American must have appreciated his murderous mindset. Then the boomer, eating alone (I wonder why?!), opened back up his laptop and entered again into the internet.
For my part, I stayed silent for the sake of my family. But I confessed in the car home that I was torn between confronting him and not engaging like African American man. What did I want to say?
“The assassin did not miss. Four were hit, including our former President, and one has died.”
Witness the culture of death. Abortion has brought us to this place. If it is acceptable to kill an inconvenient child in the womb, why not a political opponent?
Seneca was a wise man.