ACI Prensa Staff, Oct 21, 2024 / 18:30 pm (CNA).
The Latin patriarch of Jerusalem, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, has indicated that for now a two-state solution to end the war between Israel and Hamas in the Holy Land is “not realistic.”
“My impression is that no one wants a wider conflict, but no one is able to stop it,” Pizzaballa told EWTN’s Colm Flynn in an exclusive interview. “Now you need something new, creative, I don’t know what, but all the previous agreements, ideas, the prospective two-state solution, everything is not realistic now,” the cardinal explained.
Pizzaballa said the war between Israel and Hamas that has been underway since Oct. 7, 2023, is the worst period the people of the Holy Land have experienced in the last 35 years.
“Not only for the violence … but the proportion, the impact, also the emotional impact on the population, Israelis and Palestinians, and now in Lebanon, which is enormous,” he added.
Following the Hamas incursion into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel responded with a major military operation in Gaza, which has also involved Iran and Lebanon.
Over the past year, Pope Francis has frequently called for a cease-fire and an end to the war in the Holy Land, especially after praying the Angelus on Sundays. On Oct. 17, he received a former prime minister from Israel and three top former Palestinian ministers at the Vatican, to discuss the situation.
In his interview with Flynn, Pizzaballa expressed his concern about “the language of hatred” found everywhere. “This is terrible. And my concern is not so much about the war. Wars are not eternal; they finish, like all wars, but what will be after, the consequences will be terrible.”
The Church is the voice of the poor
Regarding the negotiations that must take place to achieve peace, the cardinal commented: “I don’t think the Church should enter these things. The Church is better to remain outside … because if you enter, you are not free. The strength of the Church is to be a voice, the voice of the poor.”
After indicating that “everyone has to do his job. I mean, politicians have to find a political perspective and religious leaders have to help people to find hope.” The patriarch of Jerusalem also made clear that “peace is an attitude. It’s not just an agreement.”
However, Pizzaballa continued, given the current situation “it’s not realistic to talk about peace. Now, what we have to first of all talk about is a cease-fire, to stop any kind of violence … to find also new leadership with vision, political vision, also religious leaders. And then you can think about a new perspective for the Middle East, not before.”
On the subject of hunger as a weapon of war, the cardinal regretted what is happening in Gaza and highlighted that the aid sent by international organizations is not enough to care for 2 million people.
When asked what Christians can do outside the Holy Land, Pizzaballa responded: “Pray and support. Support the Christian community as much as they can.”
Message to Israelis and Palestinians
After emphasizing that violence is not a solution, the patriarch of Jerusalem insisted that “Palestinians and Israelis are called by God to live one close to another, not against the other. And they have to rediscover their call.”
He further underscored that “the answer to the violence and to the evil is the cross.” He said “it is not impossible” to see God in the midst of all this because “the Gospel is not an idea or a narrative, it is life” and pointed to the need for everyone to “trust more in the power of grace of God.”
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
From day ONE, going. back decades Hamas has stated over and over that they will settle for NOTHING LESS than the complete eradication of the state of Israel, and that position hasn’t changed at all.
That doesn’t leave a whole lot of wiggle room for negotiations.
From the River to the Sea…
It is the Palestinians who were the first to diss the two-state solution, not the Israeli’s
The Middle Eastern’s Muslim community has been attacking their Jewish neighbors from Day 1
A one state solution would also be unrealistic, as it would inevitably end with the genocide of the entire Jewish population by Palestinian fanatics. The ideal solution is to give Gaza back to Egypt, for Israel to annex East Jerusalem, and parts of the West Bank that are effectively incorporated into Israel, and give the rest back to Jordan. A Palestinian state would sadly be safe haven for terrorists and extremists and therefore is not in the interests of the region.
A two State solution might be possible if Hamas was interested in actually governing, rather than focused on the destruction of Israel. If Hamas attempted to make life better for the people of Gaza, rather than terrorist, we would all be better off.
Following World War I, President Wilson’s proposed politics of “autonomy” devolved into only sovereign autonomy. The option for autonomy within federations (like, say, the British Commonwealth) lost currency. The Austria-Hungarian federation/dynasty, for all of its flaws, was dismembered and (some say) the resulting power vacuum in central Europe enabled Hitler to annex the German Sudetenland from the new Czechoslovakia. Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera!
Something has to happen in our post-modern world to reframe the entire conflict in the Middle East, and elsewhere.
And, neither a two-state nor a federated-state model is in the cards. Islam, of course, is a half-global cultural/religious identity, superficially subdivided under the nation-state idiom (Saudi Arabia remains a kingdom). Proxies Hamas and Hezbollah are embedded terrorist non-states infesting a Palestinian population. And, for its part, the West is a cultural/post-Christian identity that needs, as one analyst remarked on the eve of the European Union, “a purpose other than fatness.”
In the less precarious world of only a few decades back, historian Philip Jenkins speculated a remotely possible mediation role for the Papacy—coming as it does from before and outside the nation-state system. No longer even remotely likely. Although, the global spread of cardinal appointees, beginning under Pope Pius XII, might offer pause within a global and non-political matrix…assuming that the red hats and other successors of the Apostles can pick up where the real Vatican II left off. By outgrowing the navel-gazing circularity of the secularizing Synod on Synodality.
Might we say, at least, that there are no only-secular solutions to a fallen world?