Vatican City, Oct 18, 2019 / 10:26 am (CNA).- At least four of the 12 language groups at the Amazon synod overtly propose the ordination of married men to the priesthood in summary reports published by the Vatican Friday, with the majority of the discussion groups expressing openness to the idea.
“We ask, Holy Father, that you accept, for the Pan Amazon region, men to the priestly ministry and women to the diaconate, preferably indigenous, respected and recognized by their community, even if they already have a constituted and stable family, in order to assure the sacraments that accompany and sustain the Christian life of the community,” Portuguese language group A, moderated by Bishop Jesús Maria Cizuarre Berdonces of Bragança do Pará, stated in their report Oct. 18.
The Vatican released summary reports in Spanish and Portuguese from the Amazon synod’s 12 “circoli minori,” small synod discussion groups divided by language: five in Spanish, four in Portuguese, two in Italian, and one in English/French.
All four of the Portuguese discussion groups express openness to the possibility of the ordination of viri probati – a term referring to mature, married men – in remote areas of the Amazon to the priesthood.
“The ordination of the viri probati was considered necessary for Panamazonía. Married men candidates for ordination, after a fruitful diaconate must meet the following criteria, among others: life of prayer and love of the Word of God and the Church, Eucharistic life that is reflected in a life of donation and service, community experience, missionary spirit,” Portuguese group B stated in their summary report.
The Portuguese group moderated by Archbishop Pedro Brito Guimarães of Palmas proposed that the implementation the ordination of married men as priests could be delegated to the bishops’ conferences in the region or entrusted to the local bishops.
The first Italian group noted that there has been concern among some synod fathers that that the proposal of married priests in the Amazon would have implications for the Church other regions of the world.
“Other synod fathers believe that the proposal concerns all continents, that it could reduce the value of celibacy, or make the missionary impulse to serve the most distant communities be lost. They believe that, in virtue of the theological principle of synodality, the subject should be placed before the opinion of the whole Church and therefore suggest a universal Synod in this regard,” the Italian group A report stated.
The majority of Spanish groups also expressed open support for ministerial alternatives for women, including female deacons.
“Given the tradition of the Church, it is possible to recognize women’s access to the existent ministries of the lectorate and the acolyte, as well as the permanent diaconate,” Spanish language group C, moderated by Bishop Jonny Eduardo Reyes Sequera, Vicar Apostolic of Puerto Ayacucho, stated.
Spanish group E, however, stated it was against the ordination of female deacons, but proposed instead some other ministerial alternative for women. This language group is moderated by Cardinal Óscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga of Tegucigalpa.
Italians participating in the Amazon synod proposed in their report the development of an “Amazonian Rite” that would open a path for married priests and female deacons.
The group, moderated by Cardinal Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said that the creation of an “Amazon Rite” would “express the liturgical, theological, disciplinary and spiritual heritage” of the local culture.
The Synod of Bishops on the Amazon is an Oct. 6-27 meeting on the Church’s life and ministry in the Pan-Amazonian region.
“These are not final texts,” Fr. Giacomo Costa, a communications official for the Amazon synod, said at the synod press conference presenting the language group reports Oct. 18.
“Everybody has something important to say … The synod must consider everyone’s contribution,” he added.
The synod drafting committee will meet over the next week to assemble into a document the recommendations of the language groups into the final document of the Amazon synod.
The final document of the synod will then be voted on by synod members, on the penultimate day of the gathering. Per synod norms, it must pass with a 2/3 majority.
The document of synod recommendations will then be given to Pope Francis for him to use, or not, as he desires, in the writing of a post-synodal apostolic exhortation.
“The final document of the synod is offered exclusively to the Holy Father who is then going to do with it what he thinks fit,” Costa said.
[…]
Certainly it would be wonderful, if what theologian Archbishop Bruno Forte suggests is the golden key to understanding the benevolent love that permeates Pope Francis’ pontificate. The sacred heart of Jesus the key, boundless mercy constrained by a misconceived rigidity. A love that conquers all. Francis once said, isn’t it wonderful to be free?
Here we are addressing again the attraction of such an epiphany, the reconciliation of a wounded humanity embraced by a loving father. Reception of the Eucharist the consoling gift of reconciliation. Certainly it’s an attractive sentiment. An emotive catharsis if it were true. Although reconciliation is not gained in receiving Christ’s body and blood. It’s the sacrament of penance, the confession of sins and reparation that reconciles us. That is the true key to understanding Francis’ pontificate, which seeks to replace one sacrament with another, the one that heals with the one that strengthens. To receive the Eucharist in one’s sins strengthens the sins.
Our conscience is battered, now for 11 years accused of condemning sinners to death with doctrines as hard as stones. Black is not white. Good is not evil. If this were true, Christ would never have had desire to accept condemnation and crucifixion. Simply because there would be no need for so severe a sacrifice to satisfy justice, to suffer the condemnation we deserve. Why then? He did because Dilexit Nos.
Apocrypha and bad archaeology can have common types of failings and errors: they misread, misinterpret and misrepresent the findings, artefacts, relevance, tests, conditions, proportions, significance, etc., of what they recover. The longer and more expansive the transgressing the worse the problem gets.