The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Archbishop of Canterbury resigns over handling of abuse cases

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, the primate of all England and leader of the Anglican Communion, announced his resignation on Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2024, saying he takes “personal and institutional responsibility” for the mishandling of a number of high-profile abuse cases in the Anglican Church since taking the reins in 2013. (Credit: Marinella Bandini)

CNA Staff, Nov 12, 2024 / 13:45 pm (CNA).

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby announced his resignation on Tuesday, saying he takes “personal and institutional responsibility” for the mishandling of a number of high-profile abuse cases in the Anglican Church since taking the reigns in 2013.

“I hope this decision makes clear how seriously the Church of England understands the need for change and our profound commitment to creating a safer church. As I step down I do so in sorrow with all victims and survivors of abuse,” Welby, who was chosen as the 105th archbishop of Canterbury in 2012, said in a statement.

Though not accused of abuse himself, Welby was criticized for his response to a number of abuse cases within the church he led. Calls for Welby’s resignation reached a fever pitch in recent days, led by victims of a notorious Anglican serial sexual abuser, John Smyth.

A prominent attorney who volunteered at Christian summer camps in the 1970s and 1980s, the deceased Smyth was later found to have committed physical abuse, sexual abuse, and psychological coercion against over 100 boys and young men across multiple countries.

A highly anticipated 253-page Nov. 7 report written by independent reviewer Keith Makin offered a stinging indictment of Welby’s handling of the Smyth case.

According to the report, Smyth crossed paths with Welby during the time Smyth was perpetrating his abuse. Welby insisted the two were never close, despite the two exchanging Christmas cards for a time and Welby making minor donations to Smyth’s missions in Zimbabwe.

Other church officials were reportedly made aware of Smyth’s abuse as early as 1982. In 2013, after taking office as archbishop, Welby was verbally informed of Smyth’s abuse but said he mistakenly believed that police and local authorities had been informed and chose to take no further action, the report says.

The report also faults the Church of England itself for failing to prioritize safeguarding despite having formal safeguarding policies, saying those policies’ implementation was inconsistent and often inadequate.

“Welby suggests that he would have definitely been ‘more active’ had he known of the seriousness of the offenses in 2013. The evidence contained in this review suggests enough was known to have raised concerns upon being informed in 2013,” the report states.

“Our opinion … is that Justin Welby held a personal and moral responsibility to pursue this further, whatever the policies at play at the time required.”

Following the release of a 2017 documentary that publicly revealed Smyth’s abuse, Welby issued a statement and gave interviews expressing his concern for the victims, who felt Welby’s response was delayed and did not prioritize their needs. He eventually met with some victims in 2021 and issued a public apology on behalf of the church.

Welby, in his statement, said the calls for his resignation in recent days following the publication of the Makin report “renewed my long felt and profound sense of shame at the historic safeguarding failures of the Church of England.”

He asked for prayers for his wife, Caroline, and their six children.

“I believe that stepping aside is in the best interests of the Church of England, which I dearly love and which I have been honored to serve. I pray that this decision points us back towards the love that Jesus Christ has for every one of us,” he concluded.

Further contextualizing Welby’s resignation is a reckoning in recent years over child abuse in the U.K., with a 2022 independent inquiry uncovering consistent and widespread failures across various institutions, including the Church of England, to adequately protect children from sexual abuse and exploitation.

That report faulted the church for repeatedly prioritizing its reputation over the well-being of children and a tendency to minimize the seriousness of the offenses, and noted that safeguarding arrangements within the church were severely under-resourced until 2015, when resources were significantly increased under Welby’s leadership.

As head of the Church of England, Welby weathered considerable resistance from conservative Anglican leaders after he presided over the Church of England’s governing body in early 2023 voting to bless same-sex couples.

The Global South Fellowship of Anglican Churches (GSFA), which claims to represent as much as 75% of the world’s Anglicans, issued a statement at the time accusing the Church of England of breaking communion with the provinces who remain faithful to a biblical view of marriage as being between one man and one woman. Debates over same-sex marriage had simmered within Anglicanism for decades, and the Anglican Communion was significantly fractured in 2003 when the U.S.-based Episcopal Church voted to ordain a gay man in a same-sex relationship.

During his tenure, Welby participated in several ecumenical meetings and activities with Pope Francis.

During summer 2023, the pope traveled with Welby and the moderator of the Church of Scotland, Iain Greenshields, on a “pilgrimage of peace” to South Sudan. Meeting with roughly 2,500 South Sudanese refugees on Feb. 4, 2023, the Protestant leaders joined Pope Francis for a final blessing on the participants. They later appeared together at an ecumenical prayer service that attracted about 50,000 people.

In January, Welby celebrated an Anglican liturgy in the Catholic Basilica of St. Bartholomew, located on Tiber Island in Rome’s Tiber River, as part of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. Welby also celebrated an ecumenical second vespers with Pope Francis for the solemnity of the Conversion of St. Paul at the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12638 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

11 Comments

  1. If the Archbishop of Canterbury quit because of institutional cases of abuse, he should probably just close his whole outfit up, since the C of E owes its existence and raison d’etre to justify a serial wife abuser (and murderer) who wanted an ecclesiastical nihil obstat for his inability to keep his breeches zipped.

    • Hey, John, lighten up! He was just a “regular” guy after all, this binary Henry VIII.

      With a stroke of the royal pen, or whatever, the secular/ecclesial king might have lip-synced the pope into a non-parliamentary (!) blessing of “irregular” LGBTQ couples–as “couples.” In not considering all of the options available, the still backwardist Cardinal Wolsey couldn’t hold a candle to the forwardist Cardinal Fernandez….

      In only five centuries, from quaint 16th-century Protestant England to the patronized “special case” of 21st-century Catholic Africa!

      As the pre-synodal layman Thomas More is said to have said (by playwright Robert Bolt in “A Man for All Seasons”) to court parasite Sir Richard Rich…”it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world…but for Wales!”

    • Welby took a 30.000 donation in 2017 for the desecration of Canterbury Cathedral by freemasonry. He was rewarded by Bergoglio shortly afterwards with a joint airtrip for a photoshoot with slum children. Welby and Bergoglio’s plans for anti-Catholic écumenical New Church just nose-dived?

  2. Correction, he is not the 105 successor of St Augustine since that ended with the death of Cardinal Reginald Pole in November 1558! And since their orders are null and void, this is just playing dress up for grown ups!

  3. Our current Pope should follow the example of the Archbishop of Canterbury, given his protection of serial predators like Rupnik, McCarrick, Grassi, Inzoli and Zanchetta.

  4. Why are we as Catholics referring to this man as an “Archbishop”? As Catholics, the Church does not recognize any validity to his being in Holy Orders. The CofE is a ripoff of Catholicism. Should we refer to their female clergy by titles like “Archbishop”? The Catholic Church has been on a very slippery slope for centuries giving acknowledgment to a false sect.

    • That, of course, is the official view of Roman Catholic Church, one that is sometimes articulated with ecclesial arrogance and self-righteousness, and without a shred of ecumenical spirit. What, pray tell, is to be gained by the rigid declaiming again and again the sole validity of Roman orders? As if it is self-evident or has been proven by argument–as opposed to declaring it to be true–and somehow demonstrated conclusively for all to see.

      Moreover, how many Roman Catholics have actually read the relevant documents–on both sides–in that old controversy as distinct from those who simply accept at face value the official position of the RCC? Granted, it is so much easier to be a good sheep and never bother to think for oneself. Next, I suppose, someone will be saying that Anglicans are not even Christians.

      One participant here suggested that the posted comments might help draw Anglicans to Rome. They might also, I will suggest, have the effect of putting up yet another roadblock to that goal.

      • Okay. If the RCC claiming its right to Holy Orders follows from apostolic succession, please explain in what ‘shred of ecumenical spirit’ do the ACE or Anglican Church of England claim a right to the same?

        • The Church of England, or more broadly, the Anglican Communion, claims apostolic succession and valid orders and does so without rancor, hauteur, or animus toward Roman Catholicism.
          That the Roman Catholic Church does not recognize that claim is not, however, a problem for Anglicans. At least not in principle. It becomes one for both bodies, of course, if reunion is on the table.
          Rome, however, must from time to time, assert its exclusive claim to such succession, or else it wouldn’t be Rome. And while this claim may not be counter to an ecumenical spirit as such—at least on the level of Catholic leadership—it is, nevertheless an impediment.
          What is counter to an ecumenical spirit is a belligerent reasserting of the claim by some lay people who are less informed and who have far less responsibility in the matter.
          One may on occasion find a similar combative attitude among Anglicans, but I would suggest that it is rare. (I have encountered it once in a long lifetime.)
          The complex, long-standing issue of valid orders and its implications for the Eucharist is beyond my scope, purpose, and capacity to treat it here or elsewhere. It has been dealt with by many writers who are far better qualified. Two that come to mind are John J. Hughes in his Absolutely Null and Void and Felix L. Cirlot’s Apostolic Succession and Anglicanism.

  5. These comments are interesting. I will share them with my many pious, deeply Christian, Episcopalian and Anglican friends. A few are, I think, close to coming to Rome and these comments might help them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*