“Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints” is stylish and slippery

The Fox Nation series is a handsome and, for the most part, wholesome look at holy history as far as modern media goes, but it is touched with the unholy hope to break the perceived restrictions of religion.

The director Martin Scorsese discussed his Fox Nation series "Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints". (Image: Screen shot / nation.foxnews.com)

Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints, a new docudrama streaming on FOX Nation produced by the celebrated director, features the lives of eight saints in dramatic enactments with documentary supplements. The series certainly has a fresh feel to it when it comes to film material on the saints.

But some of the ideas it brings are a little too fresh.

The series premiered with its first section on November 17 with St. Joan of Arc. It continued with St. John the Baptist on November 24, St. Sebastian on December 1, and St. Maximilian Kolbe on December 8. The second section will be released in April and May 2025, over the Easter season, with St. Francis of Assisi, St. Thomas Becket, St. Mary Magdalene, and St. Moses the Black.

Each episode is followed by a short discussion with Martin Scorsese, poet Mary Karr, scholar Paul Elie, and the controversial Fr. James Martin, SJ. (The latter’s reputation no doubt precedes him due to his unorthodox and even scandalous advocacy of the LGBTQ movement—but more on that in a bit.)

There is a faithfulness and authentic interest pervading this series that is interesting to discover in a modern media rendition of these holy heroes. It undertakes to tell their stories seriously and to enter the mystical aspects of their lives with sincerity. There is little of the skepticism, scientism, or secularism that Catholics might immediately suspect. Martin Scorsese clearly desires to tell these stories with style and respect.

Executively produced and narrated by Scorsese, the series has a genuine and well-crafted cinematic quality, with convincing production values, dynamic and bold direction, and technical proficiency. It stumbles, however, where so many film projects do nowadays: in the writing. With weak and clunky scripts, the acting can only go so far, and there is a wooden, rushed, and out-of-place sense in the performances that hinders these pieces from approaching greatness.

It’s a missed opportunity, as the excellent cinematography and sacred subject matter lose themselves over the clunky cribbing and cramming involved in capturing historical complexity and spiritual transcendence in 45-minute slots. It is remarkable, nonetheless, to see such effort poured into the heroism of the saints, whose lives have rarely found such a stage as this with such professional treatment.

In reviewing the episodes on St. Joan of Arc and St. Maximilian Kolbe, it appears this ambitious, faith-based series will struggle with Martin Scorsese’s own struggles with the Faith. It is long known that Scorsese has a complicated and irregular relationship with Catholicism—a relationship, unfortunately, that may tend towards a rogue relativism.

Scorsese, as a young man, briefly considered a priestly vocation at a minor seminary but eventually embraced a film career. Over the decades, he has risen in fame as one of the most talented and visionary directors of all time, many of his films standing as icons of cinema. But through many of his films, as he picks through the rough rubble of humanity with good fellas and taxi drivers, he is keeping an eye open for the elusive God of his youth Whose presence, he suspects, could bring meaning to the violence and vitriol of human society.

The Departed (2006), arguably his masterpiece, grapples with the bewildering and brutal interweaving of good and evil in a morally ambiguous society filled with good guys and bad guys, monsters and men. Scorsese’s streets have always been mean streets and there is an effort to reconcile the grime and the grotesque with the goodness of God. His film Silence, about Jesuit missionaries in 17th-century Japan, based on the 1966 novel by Shusaku Endo, is a stirring and disturbing meditation on his search for religious truth—a search that seems to conclude repeatedly in uncertainty.

Talking about his new series, Scorsese has said that “many people are trying to find religion outside of religion.” Ironically, there is an uneven messaging in The Saints that falls into (or quite close to) this very category or criticism. There are elements in the production that appear to be at odds with themselves, expressed in the incongruity between graceful and gratuitous moments. There is both a reverence for the spirituality of the saints and a graphic physicality that is jarring—ranging from a concentration on Joan’s virginity to Kolbe’s nakedness in Auschwitz. This may be intentional, but there is something in the juxtaposition that strikes an odd chord.

This discordance likely springs from a relativist leaning on the part of the director. The episodes on Joan of Arc and Maximilian Kolbe have a slant to them that present them as unorthodox outsiders, as Catholics that stood outside the boundaries of what it meant to be Catholic in their times. Though the series thankfully avoids making Joan a feminist figure or woke pioneer or “girl boss,” they do give her a bite in the manner that she insists on her visions and wearing men’s clothes to the point she is executed by the very Church she loves. Kolbe was a priest burdened with the antisemitic sentiments of his culture, as most Catholics did, but broke free from those traces in his sympathies for Jewish victims of the Holocaust.

These deviations are stressed by The Saints. While the series does not shy away from the saints’ humanity, there is a keener interest in their controversy. The controversy of Scorsese’s Joan and Kolbe is presented as an instinctive or even divine call to strike out against the accepted grain of Catholicism in their times. In other words, the quality that makes a saint is found in the courage to go beyond tradition and teaching in response to what neighbor and God seem to demand from them. Thus, their heroism and strength are given prominence together with a rebellious inclination.

In this, The Saints presents an idea about Catholicism and sainthood framed in relative terms instead of doctrinal terms. While it leaves plenty of space for the Church, the Sacraments, and even the miracles that emboldened saints like Joan of Arc and Maximilian Kolbe, these short films include a suggested invitation to consider the Faith outside the established contexts of the Catholic Church and to imagine that sanctity and salvation could come from revolutionary dedication or nonconformist piety.

Misgivings over this familiar line of questioning become more heightened with the closing feature of each episode. After the film portion, the short panel-type conversation about the saint led by Scorsese is an interesting addition, but inevitably reveal a shallowness in the overall ambitions or visions of the series. Perhaps it is unrealistic to expect much from something clearly crafted for a mass audience, but slipping Fr. James Martin in there is suspicious.

Scorsese has a working relationship with Fr. Martin, who assisted him in the productions of Silence and The Irishman, but it cannot be lost on Scorsese that Martin is a controversial figure in the Church—much like the saints Scorsese is bringing to the screen. While it’s heartening to hear Fr. Martin speak well of sainthood and the spiritual life, it is impossible to dismiss the nudgings, however gentle, towards an unconventional openness regarding the Catholic life that these saints allegedly model and which we know he champions.

As an artist, Scorsese grapples with or gropes for God with a vigor that can be violent (as many of his films attest). That artistic intensity can be irresponsible, however, if it invites making demands upon the Divine, to insist on ecclesial approval for personal inclinations, or to sanctify views that contradict tradition.

Such an interest is clearly present in the blasphemous The Last Temptation of Christ, and Scorsese’s questioning comes through loud and clear in The Saints. Though they are reverential toward these characters and the magnificence of their faith, there is still a strong whiff of something that wants to edge the Catholic Faith beyond itself, to catch its heroes breaking her rules, to find a way of being religious outside of religion.

Some saints did break rules in the name of religion. But they were radicals according to the paradoxes of the Beatitudes—not progressives who refused to be hedged in by a stagnant Church. The saints were glorious risk takers, without doubt, and as an artist, Scorsese admires the risks they took to live out their faith with kindness and courage. But the riskiness of the saints was not what Scorsese might want it to be—namely, a blessing to pursue sanctity according to personal vision or conviction.

The risk of tracing the borders of Catholicism to uncover some revisionist path leading to salvation is not the risk of the saints. Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints is a handsome and, for the most part, wholesome look at holy history as far as modern media goes, but it is touched with the unholy hope to break the perceived restrictions of religion. Catholics who are up for an interesting experience would not be remiss in taking this series in, but they should be aware of the spiritual sleight of hand that is being played, however consciously, by Martin Scorsese and company.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Sean Fitzpatrick 31 Articles
Sean Fitzpatrick is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College and serves on the faculty of Gregory the Great Academy in Elmhurst, Pennsylvania. He teaches Literature, Mythology, and Humanities. Mr. Fitzpatrick’s writings on education, literature, and culture have appeared in a number of journals including Crisis Magazine, Catholic Exchange, the Cardinal Newman Society’s Journal for Educators, and the Imaginative Conservative. He lives in Scranton with his wife, Sophie, and their seven children.

19 Comments

  1. It was good to see this review making some criticisms; but the series also had some historical errors that should be criticized. The episode on Joan of Arc wasn’t as bad as it might have been, but it distorted a number of issues such as her so-called “male clothing”: the show claims that she insisted on it after Jehan de Metz offered to buy her a dress, but that’s not what Jehan de Metz actually said: he said he was the one who gave her a soldier’s riding outfit and brought up the issue in the first place, and the riding outfit was necessary if she didn’t want her legs to be scraped raw against the horse’s sides while riding for hours a day. We also have several eyewitness accounts quoting her on the reasons she continued wearing this in prison and kept it “securely laced and tied” together: the purpose was to make it difficult for her English guards to pull her clothing off since all the parts of this type of soldier’s outfit could be laced together. It also repeats the tired claim that Charles VII did nothing to save her, which was debunked long ago by historians who were accepted as experts on the subject such as Pierre Champion: Charles VII tried to ransom her but the Burgundians refused; and his army conducted four or five rescue attempts while she was held in Rouen.

  2. I make it a practice to stay away from films that are the fruit of our current corrupt culture. I also stay away from restaurants with a reputation for customers getting food poisoning. And why, in God’s name, would I ever even consider a film where Fr. James Martin SJ is the consultant? (By the way, what exactly is this man’s priestly ministry?)

        • Thank you for directing me to the updated news, MrsCracker. The Pope prayed before it briefly when it was fist shown. Now the baby and the scarf are gone, with only Joseph and Mary remaining. Let us see if the scarf returns along with the baby on Dec 24. Seems the Nativity Scene was designed and crafted by Bethlehem artists including Palestinians. This is a travesty in several ways. There were no Palestinians at the time of Jesus. And there were no Muslims there until the seventh century A.D.
          Jesus was Jewish not “Palestinian”. As Christianity spread, most of the land of today’s Israel/Palestine/Lebanon became Christian, as did North Africa (scholar R. Ibrahim reminds us that at the time of the Muslim conquest of Egypt Christians made up more than 90% of the population; now Christians make up barely 10% of Egypt’s population and are being oppressed into eventual disappearance), Syria, Anatolia (today’s Turkey!) until the Muslim jihad that started in the seventh century A.D. Then Islam and Muslims began to replace Christianity and Christians. Christians are now a small and threatened minority in lands where Christianity and Christians were once the majority religion and the majority of the population.

          • I hear you Mr. Oscar. I read this morning that they think there are exactly 3 Jews left in all of Syria.
            But there’s nothing wrong with Arab Christians in Bethlehem crafting a Nativity scene. That’s ok. I have an olive wood Jerusalem Cross on my desk that was crafted by the same people . What wasn’t ok was making a political statement out of a Christmas Creche.

  3. Very interesting that the FOX network would include Fr. James Martin in their presentation. Perhaps this is to their credit. Many of you will most likely violently disagree with me, but I see this as a healthy indication of a possible return to sanity. We have been to long polarized and too often we have completely vilified those that we disagree with. To include such a man by this network shows a much needed moral fortitude that I would hope CNN can match. May God bless us all as we look toward the next Conclave.

  4. Grace writes truth, ungrace cannot. Grace typically does not flow through something that wants to be called self-sacramentality, it comes through sacramental encounter with Christ, the inconceivable peace. No sacrament, no Grace. No Grace, no Truth.

  5. I had initially been interested in this series but when I read that James Martin appears at the end of every episode, I quickly lost interest.

  6. The bit about Joan of Arc’s virginity is there because virginity was not only important to her personally but it was a major element in her mystique as her self description, “Joan the Maid.” (Note how she appears in Shakespeare, pleading pregnancy after capture!)In captivity, she really was examined by noble English matrons to verify that condition. (They also testified to seeing callouses on her buttocks from all that riding.)

    Nobody is ever going to make a better film about Joan’s trial than Dreyer’s PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC. But the trial transcript that provided the script and the transcript of her “rehabilitation” trial are available in English–take and read to get the best sense of who Joan was.

  7. AS long as the stories he promotes stick as closely as possible to the facts, I cant see anything especially wrong with this series. These are not documentaries as such.

    Most people, whether young or old, are secularized now. They have ZERO knowledge of the saints at all, and that is a shame. Anything to spark in interest in their further investigation of the subject would be wonderful.

    I heard this same purist carping when the online series The Chosen began to air. Its too bad, because The Chosen is wonderful. Season five of The Chosen will appear to the public next March. In fact it has made a tremendous positive impact, among believers and non-believers alike. How can that be bad?Ditto with this series on The Saints.

    As for Father Martin, there is nothing to keep you from switching off the TV after the program has aired. Dont listen to him if you dont want to.I am not a proponent of “do your own thing” religion. But I do support efforts which make an attempt to bring people closer to God.

    • Those are good points LJ. These days there are people who have no scriptural or religious literacy whatsoever. Nada. A film that will even acquaint them with the saints is better than nothing at all. And as you say, it might incentivize them to learn more.
      I’ve mentioned before that I’ve spoken with young people who didn’t know who the Three Kings were or what happened in Bethlehem on Christmas. Just basic Christian knowledge you’d imagine, but they were totally clueless. That’s where many of us are at today. So good for Martin Scorsese for even trying. Maybe he could have tried a little harder, but it is what it is.

  8. Wherever Jimmy Martin is involved in and with, the only response is the time honoured one: here be dragons!!! You can be sure that it will rot ones soul!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*