Buffalo, N.Y., Apr 29, 2019 / 08:54 pm (CNA).- Three priests have been temporarily removed from ministry in the Diocese of Buffalo, after seminarians say they engaged in salacious and inappropriate conversation during a party at a parish rectory. Officials say the removal is a sign that protocols are followed in the Diocese of Buffalo.
A statement from the Diocese of Buffalo said that during an April 11 gathering of priests and seminarians at a parish rectory, “unsuitable, inappropriate and insensitive conversations occurred that were disturbing and offensive to several seminarians in attendance. The complaints did not include or infer any instance of physical sexual abuse of a minor or adult.”
“The Diocese of Buffalo is thankful the seminarians followed the proper protocol and the Seminary responded correctly by immediately investigating and forwarding the findings to Bishop Richard J. Malone and other diocesan officials, including the Office of Professional Responsibility,” the statement added.
“Our primary mission is the education of our students and the formation of our future priests, deacons, and pastoral ministers,” Fr. John Staak, interim rector at Buffalo’s Christ the King Seminary noted in a statement last week.
“I am pleased the seminarians stepped forward to voice their concerns about unsuitable, inappropriate, and insensitive conversations which occurred [at a social gathering of priests and seminarians.] Several seminarians in attendance found the conversations disturbing and offensive.”
One of the priests temporarily removed from ministry is a formator at the seminary.
While seminarians described the conversation as “pornographic,” and described lewd sexual references in a written report, other priests who attended the party told reporters they did not hear all of the salacious talk the seminarians claim to have heard, and say they wonder whether some aspects of the conversation were misinterpreted.
Malone took no chances on the matter, removing the priests from active ministry last week. The diocese said that “disciplinary and corrective actions include: psychological evaluations and possible treatment, retraining in sexual harassment policies, individual retreats and, based on the results of these steps and additional investigation, further actions may be taken.”
The diocesan statement did not say whether the priests are accused of a particular canonical delict, or crime.
Generally speaking, Church law prohibits compelling a priest to undergo psychological evaluations or treatment against his will, with few exceptions. Church policy also generally requires that a canonical process assure a priest accused of misconduct has occasion to defend himself before being subject to a penalty. The Diocese of Buffalo’s initial statement did not indicate whether a canonical process for the priests will be forthcoming.
Malone has come under fire in recent months, after his former secretary alleged in August 2018 that the bishop had omitted the names of some priests accused of abuse or misconduct from a list the diocese released last March.
The bishop has since faced calls for his resignation.
In a statement released April 11, Malone maintained that he acted in good faith, and did not cover up any allegations. He assured Catholics in the Diocese of Buffalo that he intends to be more transparent about clerical sexual abuse and its financial impact on his diocese.
In his statement last week, the diocese reiterated its commitment to addressing allegations of clerical misconduct.
“It is of primary importance to Bishop Malone that these priests are held accountable for their actions,” the statement said.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
The quick action of the bishop and the seminarians is to be congratulated. I am reminded of the misdeeds of McCarrick. The situation in his diocesan seminary even before he arrived on the scene had been denounced in a series of articles by The Wanderer. Since nothing was done to correct the situation, McCarrick could walk in and find himself right at home to commit his crimes with no objections.
Hard to say.
Tattletale snowflake seminarians?
Or McCarrick’s disciples talking shop & grooming the young?
Dear Jesus come soon.
Since when is it ever appropriate for a Catholic priest to talk in erotic (pornographic) terms? I wondered upfront if the priests weer discussing the sexual physical attributes of the young male seminarians as if judging horses being put out to stud.
Yes indeed! Whatever happened to the checkpoints of the Catholic conscience:
-thought
-word
-deed
Are these stop-gap guides to be discarded at age 18? The attorney/priest, St. Alphonus Ligouri would tell us that as we mature these guides are needed more than ever. With such present avant-garde formators at seminaries and Catholic colleges, it’s no wonder our church is in such a mess. Wonder if the Argentine leader, who advocates “making a mess” is rejoicing.