New York City, N.Y., Sep 29, 2021 / 17:00 pm (CNA).
Reluctant states should sign a treaty banning nuclear weapons, Vatican diplomat Archbishop Paul Gallagher told the United Nations on Tuesday. The nuclear arms race and strategies of nuclear deterrence are dysfunctional, draw resources from humanitarian concerns, and distract from the imperative to seek peace, he said.
“Faced with a global pandemic of uncertain duration and the worsening effects of global climate change, States must reduce military expenditures in the interest of meeting humanitarian needs and the demands of our common home,” Gallagher said Sept. 28. “I particularly urge those States benefiting from the nuclear umbrella to help recalibrate global priorities by supporting nuclear disarmament efforts under the Non-Proliferation Treaty Article VI.”
He criticized factors that help perpetuate the current situation on nuclear weapons. He warned of “the exorbitant spending by a few States in the production and deployment of nuclear arsenals,” saying this is a source of inequality within and across countries.
Gallagher, the Holy See’s Secretary for Relations with States, cited previous Vatican exhortations that governments redirect money for weapons into “a global fund that can finally put an end to hunger and favor development in the most impoverished countries.”
His pre-recorded Sept. 28 statement addressed a meeting of the U.N. General Assembly. The U.N. was hosting a high-level plenary meeting that marked the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.
In 2017, some 122 U.N. member states voted to adopt the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. It took force in January. It currently has 86 signatories and 56 states are parties to it.
“The Holy See is grateful to those States that have signed and ratified the treaty, and it encourages reluctant States to join this important agreement,” Gallagher said Tuesday.
For Gallagher, the policy of nuclear deterrence “drives the arms race and generates a dehumanizing technological environment that sustains and aggravates mistrust among nations.” He cited St. John XXIII’s endorsement of “mutual trust,” not “an equal supply of armaments,” as a source of lasting peace.
“Trust among nations warrants verification and the Holy See strongly endorses verifiable disarmament agreements,” he said. He invoked the U.N. Charter’s commitment to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war” which has “brought untold sorrow to mankind.”
In 2017 the Holy See was among the first countries to sign and ratify the treaty. It bars the development, production, testing, acquisition, possession or stockpiling of nuclear weapons or other nuclear devices. It also bars the use or threat of use of these weapons.
It is the first multilateral nuclear disarmament treaty in more than two decades.
Most nuclear powers did not take part in the treaty negotiations.
The United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, Israel, and other countries possessing nuclear weapons did not sign or ratify the treaty, nor did some ally countries of nuclear powers, including South Korea and Japan.
In May 2021 the Congressional Budget Office analyzed U.S. Department of Defense and Department of Energy budget requests. It estimated the costs of maintaining U.S. nuclear forces at $60 billion per year, totaling $634 billion from 2021-2030. This includes ballistic missile submarines, intercontinental ballistic missiles, nuclear weapons laboratories and supporting activities.
Pope Francis has condemned not only the potential use of nuclear weapons but also “their very possession.”
“Weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons, create nothing but a false sense of security. They cannot constitute the basis for peaceful coexistence between members of the human family, which must rather be inspired by an ethics of solidarity,” he said in a November 2017 speech to participants in a nuclear disarmament symposium.
Pope Francis’ Sept. 25, 2015 speech in New York urged the U.N. General Assembly “to work for a world free of nuclear weapons” and for a full application of the Non-Proliferation Treaty that aims for “a complete prohibition of these weapons.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Commenting ONLY on the arithmetic–and fully appreciating Archbishop Gallagher’s message for eventual nuclear disarmament–we note that the ten-year United States nuclear price tag is $634 billion for 2021-2030.
This outlay is only ONE-SIXTH of the (one-year?) price tag for the proposed $3.5 Trillion COVID-labeled “human infrastructure” proposal currently haunting the halls of Congress. (For another comparison, the annual interest payment on the national debt is five times the nuclear budget, or $305 billion/year).
Not sure when the Congress lost any skill in dealing with decimal points alongside of dollar signs, but remembering the wit and wisdom of Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, who in the 1960s exhorted: “A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money!”
Diverted to well-designed and strategic projects the $63 billion/year nuclear budget could do a lot of good toward hunger reduction in impoverished regions, but spent badly (for example, for socialist income redistribution) it pencils out to only 0.83 cents/year per man, woman and child on planet earth.
Oops. Slipped a decimal, mostly!: the figure 0.38 cents/year should read 8.3 dollars/year, or 2.3 cents/day. Same general point, but different decimal point.
Getting rid of nuclear weapons is one of the dumbest ideas our hierarchy has ever proposed. Nuclear weapons are accomplishing exactly what their creators hoped they would: make direct military confrontation between nuclear powers unthinkable. Getting rid of them would lead to a lot more direct regional and international military conflicts, and the deaths of countless people. Just look at the example of Pakistan and India: three extremely deadly wars with hundreds of thousands of casualties BEFORE both sides obtained the bomb. Since then, though they remain mortal enemies, only small border skirmishes that were never allowed to escalate.
So is his Excellency Bishop Gallagher going to persuade the Chinese, Russians, North Koreans, Pakistanis and Iranians to give up their nuclear weapons and/or nuclear weapons programs? Because without that it would be sheer lunacy for the US, UK, France and Israel to give up theirs.