The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Bishop Olson: Carmelite prioress admitted 5 times to breaking chastity vow

Left: The Reverend Mother Superior Teresa Agnes Gerlach of the Monastery of the Most Holy Trinity in Arlington, Texas. (Image: Monastery of the Most Holy Trinity Discalced Carmelite Nuns); right: Bishop Michael Olson of Fort Worth, TX (Image: Wikipedia)

Washington D.C., Jun 12, 2023 / 15:05 pm (CNA).

Bishop Michael Olson of the Diocese of Fort Worth in a statement shared on YouTube denied that he abused his authority when investigating a prioress of a Carmelite monastery and alleged that she admitted, on five separate occasions, that she had broken her vow of chastity.

The dispute between the monastery and the diocese began in April when Olson launched a canonical investigation into an alleged sexual affair between the monastery’s prioress, Reverend Mother Teresa Gerlach, and an unnamed priest from outside the diocese.

The diocese has called the alleged misconduct “grave” but has not publicized the exact nature of the affair. On June 1 the bishop issued a decree dismissing Gerlach from religious life.

Following the investigation, the Monastery of the Most Holy Trinity and Gerlach filed a $1 million lawsuit against the bishop and the diocese. The lawsuit alleged that in the course of the diocese’s investigation into Gerlach’s conduct, the bishop demanded access to phones and computers and subjected the nuns to lengthy questioning in late April.

The diocese filed a response with the court, which argued that this is an internal Church matter investigating alleged violations of the Sixth Commandment and should not be subject to the civil court system.

On May 31, the Vatican formally recognized the bishop’s authority over the monastery and the investigation. The monastery has continued its civil lawsuit and in early June filed theft and defamation charges against the bishop and the diocese.

The bishop’s statement on YouTube

In an eight-minute-long YouTube video released by the diocese on Sunday, June 11, Bishop Olson said he decided to make a public statement because “others” had brought the matter into “inappropriate venues” such as the media and civil courts.

“These attempts on the part of others have asserted baseless and false claims into the public mind, causing confusion among you, the faithful,” Olson said. “A confusion that I would like to clarify for you at this time.”

In the video, the bishop alleged that Gerlach admitted to violations of the vow of chastity on four separate occasions before Olson came to the monastery to request access to phones and computers as part of the investigation.

He said Vicar General Father Jonathan Wallis and Sister Francis Therese of the monastery were present when Gerlach made these admissions.

“She voluntarily made these admissions on four different days with clarity and consistency, but without naming the priest,” Olson said. “To be clear, she made these admissions outside of the sacrament of confession.”

Olson said she admitted for a fifth time April 24 to breaking her vow of chastity and provided the name of the priest with whom she allegedly violated her vow of chastity.

The bishop said she made the admission in front of him, Sister Francis Therese, Chancellor and Moderator of the Curia Msgr. E. James Hart, and Director of Safe Environment Sandra Schrader-Farry.

The reverend mother’s lawyer has claimed that she never had sexual relations with a priest and that she was under the influence of pain medication after an operation when the bishop questioned her and does not remember the admission. Olson is now saying that this conversation took place before she had the operation.

“This conversation took place the late afternoon of the day before she had surgery; not after the surgery,” Olson said. “She was not under the influence of anesthesia. She was clear and lucid and had normal use of her physical and mental faculties at that time. Claims to the contrary are false and baseless and untrue.”

Olson also contested the monastery’s characterization of the events, claiming that the phone and computers “were requested calmly and given freely by Mother Teresa Agnes for purposes of the internal inquiry into this matter.”

The bishop said he reported the priest to his superiors after being given his name and said the priest refused to either confirm or deny the allegations. He said the priest is not currently assigned and has restricted faculties. The reverend mother has been dismissed from religious life.

Olson also denied allegations that he is seeking information about the monastery’s donor list and said that accusations that he and the diocese are spying on the monastery are “baseless, ludicrous, and not true.”

Amid the investigation, Olson further alleged that individuals closely associated with the monastery have come to him with information about illegal drug activity, but did not elaborate on specifically who is accused of possessing the drugs. The diocese also released photos, which they claimed show marijuana edibles in the monastery.

“I want you to know that this evidence and information was immediately reported and turned over by the Diocese of Fort Worth to the Arlington Police Department,” the bishop said.

While the bishop’s investigation is ongoing, he has put restrictions on the monastery, which prevent the nuns from accessing daily Mass and regular confession. The restrictions also prevent lay participation in the Mass. The monastery requested that the bishop lift these restrictions, but he said they will stay in place as long as the civil lawsuit remains in place.

Olson also requested that the Dallas Carmelite Auxiliary halt a fundraiser that is intended to help the monastery with its legal funds. He accused the auxiliary of being “complicit in rebellious disobedience.”

The bishop also asked for prayers for the diocese, the monastery, the reverend mother, and for himself.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12661 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

9 Comments

  1. In the picture at the top the spelling of “Bishop” is wrong.

    If the allegations were true why shouldn’t/couldn’t the matter have been handled differently?

  2. When they had the drug fueled gay orgy at the Vatican, I don’t remember them shutting down Mass and Confession at St. Peter’s Basilica to investigate.

    The Drug-Fueled Homosexual Scandal Allegations at the Holy Office
    https://www.ncregister.com/blog/the-drug-fueled-homosexual-scandal-allegations-at-the-holy-office?

    “While the bishop’s investigation is ongoing, he has put restrictions on the monastery, which prevent the nuns from accessing daily Mass and regular confession. The restrictions also prevent lay participation in the Mass. The monastery requested that the bishop lift these restrictions, but he said they will stay in place as long as the civil lawsuit remains in place.”

  3. Wow. From what I can tell, they have 4 nuns and a very grand and palatial convent. I’m just going to guess that the Bishop has some idea of what that structure and its grounds cost.

  4. This is a very disturbing situation. Its too bad the whole affair could not be confined to withing church hierarchy to be handled. Even if the admission was not made during confession as the Bishop said, it still looks very intrusive for the parties involved to make these accusations for public consumption. Going public like this does nothing more than give the church another black eye in the secular world. Much is unsaid here. If the priest is from another diocese entirely, how did the two make contact? I believe it was inappropriate for the monastery to bring this into civil court. They are not a business, they are under church authority. Money they are spending on their suit could be used to support the nuns and their monastery, or to further their mission. With too many church hierarchy advocating “do your own thing” in spite of church law and tradition, this is where we end up. Sad.

  5. This Bishop hs no self-respect and no respect for his clerical Office whatsoever. Even if true, this matter should have been handled privately but he intentionally wants to defame in the worst way possible the True Catholics like the traditional nuns. That’s perverse!! By the way, how did the Mother Superior violate her chastity vows 5 times (next time the Bishop will say 40) from a wheelchair and looking as frail as she looks?

    The accusation against her is so perverse that it is the Bishop who violated his own chastity vows with an accusation that only the filthiest mind can come up with. The Bishop tries to cover up his perversity with the most unprecedented, hateful, draconian punishments the nuns could ever suffer but that, again, shows his own immoral perversity. Pray hard for both the Bishop and the nuns. May Jesus True Justice be glorified in all things for our humility and may we be free from perverse sin-empowering mercy that empowers and enthrones the evil.

  6. So, we read that the Vatican supports the authority of the bishop over this matter. Isn’t that the same Vatican that turned a blind eye to an Italian bishop having a lewd painting portrayed on the wall inside of a church? I mean, it portrays the naked bishop in a group of naked people. No problem? Yet if a nun has a discrete relationship with a priest, and it’s not actually perverted (as is the scene portrayed in the Italian church) then this becomes sensationalized. In Oregon it is laughable for someone to get bent out of shape over the consumption of edible marijuana. I think that Bishop Olsen is acting in an unbalanced manner.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*