Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 5, 2023 / 17:35 pm (CNA).
Church leaders, environmental activists, and Catholic groups around the world responded positively this week to Pope Francis’ latest apostolic exhortation Laudate Deum, what the Holy Father billed as a continuance of his earlier landmark writing on climate change and the environment.
The pope released Laudate Deum on Wednesday, having touted it as the “second part” of his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si’, which urged decisive and proactive measures to tackle the climate change crisis.
Laudate Deum took a more forceful and unapologetic stance on climate change, with the pope describing the matter as “no longer a secondary or ideological question.” The document, meanwhile, was met with praise both by Catholic and environmental leaders upon its publication.
Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales and archbishop of Westminster, said in a statement that the document was the pope’s “heartfelt appeal to all people of goodwill, to communities, business[es], governments, and international bodies that each play a part in facing and responding to the challenges of climate change.”
The pope “asks each of us to contribute by efforts ‘to reduce pollution and waste, to consume with prudence’ and thereby help ‘to create a new culture,’” Nichols said.
Marcene Mitchell, the senior vice president of climate change at the World Wide Fund for Nature, said in a statement that Francis in his exhortation “has once again called on us to protect our common home by fixing our broken relationship with nature.”
“His words are also a critical reminder of the importance of leaders everywhere speaking to the urgency of the climate crisis,” Mitchell said.
Individual bishops also responded positively to the exhortation. Columbus, Ohio, Bishop Earl K. Fernandes “warmly welcom[ed]” the document, the Diocese of Columbus said in a statement, calling the climate crisis “a moral issue” and the pope’s exhortation an invitation to “radical solidarity with those who suffer from the deleterious effects of environmental change and disaster.”
Trenton, New Jersey, Bishop David M. O’Connell said in a reflection that he “pray[ed] that the Holy Father’s vigilant attention to the threats to our ‘common home’ — which fundamentally includes every human life — falls upon fertile ground, converting our hearts and inspiring us all to do whatever we can to make a positive difference.”
Numerous Catholic nonprofit groups were also among those who reacted positively to the new document. Catholic Relief Services, the humanitarian initiative of the USCCB, said in a press release that Laudate Deum is “fundamentally a rallying cry for the crucial policy work needed to change paths.”
“[Francis] invites leaders everywhere to rise above self-interest and imagine a future shaped by the common good,” CRS wrote, calling on leaders to “intertwine the hopeful and borderless message of Laudate Deum into our collective actions.”
Catholic Climate Covenant, meanwhile — a climate-oriented group founded in 2006 — said in a press release that the exhortation “underscores the timely and intrinsic link between our Catholic faith and the moral imperative to protect our common home and all people and creatures today and tomorrow.”
“Driven by faith, facts on the ground, and clear science, Pope Francis’ exhortation urges us to look at what has happened to our planet and acknowledge what we need to do now to fix it,” the group said.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Bishop Earl K. Fernandes “warmly welcome(ed)” […] the new document, calling the climate crisis “a moral issue.” YES, and also clearly framing things morally, we have this from St. John Paul II:
“Clearly, an adequate solution cannot be found merely in better management or a more rational use of the earth’s resources, as important as these may be. Rather, we must go to the source of the problem and face in its entirety that profound moral CRISIS OF WHICH THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONLY ONE TROUBLING ASPECT [italics]” (“And God Saw that it was Good,” 1990 World Day of Peace, Dec. 8, 1989).
AND, in 1991, this too from Centesimus Annus (nn. 37-39, caps added):
“…worrying is THE ECOLOGICAL QUESTION [….] In addition to the irrational destruction of the natural environment, we must also mention the more serious destruction of THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT [….] Although people are rightly worried—though much less than they should be—about preserving the natural habitats of the various animal species threatened with extinction, because they realize that each of these species makes its particular contribution to the balance of nature in general, too little effort is made to SAFEGUARD THE MORAL CONDITIONS OF AN AUTHENTIC ‘HUMAN ECOLOGY’ [….]
“The first and fundamental structure for ‘human ecology’ is the FAMILY in which man receives his first formative ideas about truth and goodness, and learns what it means to love and to be loved, and thus what it actually means to be a person [….] These policies [e.g., recourse to abortion as] poisoning the lives of millions of defenseless human beings, as if in a form of ‘chemical warfare’ [….] These criticisms are directed not so much against an economic system as against an ethical and cultural system.”
_______________________________________________________________________
THEN, about “walking together” in gradualism to inevitably redefine the family?
While pretending that a selective change of Church practice will not alter moral teaching, the (c)hurchy SYNOD on SYNODALITY might as well annex itself to the gay agenda by blessing gay couplings…
And, to be equitably inclusive (!), also might as well admit to the Eucharist all those other natural (binary) but “irregular marriages.”
I’ll go with Francis X. Maier in First Things, Oct. 4.
And Phil Lawler in Catholic Culture, Oct. 4.
Singling out the U.S. and ignoring China (a much greater polluter) hardly seems to be a balanced approach.