Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 11, 2024 / 14:00 pm (CNA).
Speaking on behalf of the U.S. bishops, Bishop Robert Barron condemned the practice of surrogacy, joining Pope Francis in calling it a “grave injustice” that results in the “commercialization of women and children.”
Barron, who is the head of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, and chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family, and Youth, issued his statement on Jan. 10. His statement follows the pope’s speech Jan. 8 to the ambassadors to the Vatican in which he called for a global ban on surrogacy, calling it a “grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child.”
“The desire to utilize surrogacy might feel like the desire to form a family naturally, but no matter how well-intentioned, surrogacy always does grave injustice to the child, any discarded embryos (who are our fellow human beings), the commodified birth mother, and the loving union of the spouses,” Barron said.
“Surrogacy represents the commodification and instrumentalization of a woman’s body, treating her as a ‘carrier’ rather than a human person,” he went on, adding that “just as troubling is the fact that the child is reduced to terms of buying and selling as an object of human trafficking.”
Surrogacy is legal in most states, and according to Fortune, the surrogacy industry is “booming,” worth over $14 billion in the U.S. in 2022. Surrogate mothers who agree to carry other individuals’ babies are typically paid between $50,000 to $60,000 to do so, according to the group SENSIBLE Surrogacy.
Barron echoed the pope’s words, saying that “a child is a gift and as such can ‘never [be] the basis of a commercial contract.’”
“It might be the case that couples earnestly want to have children without resorting to surrogacy, but painful and even life-threatening medical obstacles make childbirth hazardous or impossible,” he granted.
“The Church teaches that married couples are not obliged to actually have children, but to be open to any life that might be the fruit of their union.”
The Church, he went on, has a “responsibility to accompany these couples [struggling with infertility] in their suffering.”
Nevertheless, he said that the “commercialization of women and children in surrogacy is underlined by the belief that there is a right to have a child. The child becomes an object for the fulfillment of one’s desires instead of a person to be cherished.”
“In this way,” he went on, “the genuine right of the child to be conceived through the love of his or her parents is overlooked in favor of ‘the right to have a child by any means necessary.’”
Barron said: “We must avoid this way of thinking and answer the call to respect human life, beginning with the unborn child.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Fine as far as it goes but skirts the issue of gay procurement of children via surrogacy.
We had the opposite issue. God gave us blessed fertility. We had two beautiful sons and wanted more children, but my wife’s life would be in danger with another pregnancy. Because we were young, we had to make a moral decision. We did. For life!
Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth”. Scripture makes no mention of the barren couple.
The moral fabric of the couple seeking IVF and the “gamble” they take with the emotional health of the baby and how they nurture that baby’s health moving forward.
My efforts to gain knowledge on the IVF process waned, I soon found out that I needed a medical degree to solve the myriad of complexities.
God help us.
Phil Lawler follows up where Bishop Barron leaves off.
See “The worst arguments for surrogate motherhood”, Catholic Culture, Jan. 12.