National Catholic Register, Jul 21, 2024 / 07:00 am (CNA).
Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance is one of the most overtly religious major politicians in America.
Vance has written extensively about his life in faith, both in a mega-selling memoir and in a long essay that describes how a drug-using teenager with anger problems, family problems, school problems, and doubts about God became an accomplished, successful family man excited about being a Catholic.
But nowadays, he’s also the most questioned of religious politicians, as pro-lifers ask if he’s still one of them.
Where did he come from in faith? And how did he get where he is now?
Vance, who comes from a long line of culturally Protestant Scots-Irish Americans from Appalachia, was baptized Catholic in August 2019.
Below are 13 items about his meandering journey to Rome and the aftermath, drawn largely from his 3-million-copy-selling 2016 memoir “Hillbilly Elegy” and a 6,777-word essay he wrote about his conversion for the Easter 2020 issue of The Lamp, a Catholic magazine.
Vance also talked about his conversion in an August 2019 interview with Rod Dreher published in The American Conservative.
1. J.D. Vance rarely went to church as a child.
Vance was largely raised by his grandmother, whom he called “Mamaw,” who believed in Jesus and liked Billy Graham but didn’t like what she called “organized religion.”
Vance wasn’t baptized as a child. The family members he spent the most time around generally didn’t go to church unless they were visiting their Appalachian ancestral home in Jackson, Kentucky.
Even so, he says in his memoir, his grandmother had “a deeply personal (albeit quirky) faith.”
2. Vance had a crisis of faith as a child.
When he was about 10, Vance had a moment of doubt.
“Mamaw, does God love us?” he asked his grandmother after a major disappointment, mindful of the fractured family life he and his half-sister were growing up in.
The question caused his grandmother to cry.
Vance doesn’t say how his grandmother answered the question. But he describes another instance when Mamaw accidentally went the wrong way on a three-lane interstate before making a U-turn, causing him to scream in terror.
“Don’t you know Jesus rides in the car with me?” his grandmother replied.
3. As a teenager, Vance was a Pentecostal.
As an adolescent, Vance reconnected with his biological father, whom he hadn’t seen much of after his parents split up. For a while, he stayed with his dad every other weekend.
“With little religious training, I was desperate for some exposure to a real church,” Vance wrote in “Hillbilly Elegy.”
His father had given up drinking and became a serious Pentecostal, and he would take Vance to a large Pentecostal church in southeastern Ohio with his new wife and their children.
Vance drank it in. Among other things, he rejected evolution and embraced millennialism, including a belief that the world would end in 2007.
“I’m not sure if I liked the structure or if I just wanted to share in something that was important to him — both, I suppose — but I became a devoted convert,” Vance writes in his memoir.
4. Vance didn’t like the Catholic Church when he was a kid.
Even before he started going to a Pentecostal church, Vance thought he knew certain things about Catholicism — which he didn’t like.
“I knew that Catholics worshipped Mary. I knew they rejected the legitimacy of Scripture. And I knew that the Antichrist — or at least, the Antichrist’s spiritual adviser — would be a Catholic,” Vance wrote in his April 2020 article in The Lamp of his once-misguided impressions.
5. Vance’s image of Jesus when he was growing up differed from his image of the Catholic Church’s image of Jesus.
One of Vance’s aunts married a Catholic, whom Vance liked and respected.
“I admired my uncle Dan above all other men …,” Vance wrote in “Hillbilly Elegy.”
His grandmother liked Dan, too.
But Catholicism seemed too formal and impersonal to her.
“The Catholic Jesus was a majestic deity, and we had little interest in majestic deities because we weren’t a majestic people,” Vance wrote in his conversion essay.
6. “Hillbilly Elegy” isn’t a conversion story.
Vance mentions the word “Catholic” or “Catholics” only five times in the 264-page book, and he never engages with Catholic teachings in it. He wrote it between 2013 and 2015, several years before he became a Catholic, and gives no hint that he had ever considered Catholicism.
He also doesn’t dwell in his book on his atheism as a young man, a period he describes at length in his conversion essay in The Lamp.
7. An Anglican philosopher provided the first crack in Vance’s atheism.
While he was still a nonbeliever, Vance encountered the work of English philosopher Basil Mitchell (1917–2011) in an undergraduate philosophy course at Ohio State.
As Vance describes it, Mitchell, who was a member of the Church of England, presented difficult experiences in life as a trial of faith that requires trust in God without fully understanding what God has in mind.
Vance was surprised by Mitchell’s presentation because as a young Christian he had always thought that “[d]oubt was unacceptable” and “that the proper response to a trial of faith was to suppress it and pretend it never happened.”
“But here was Mitchell,” Vance wrote in his conversion essay, “conceding that the brokenness of the world and our individual tribulations did, in fact, count against the existence of God. But not definitively.”
8. A homosexual billionaire influenced Vance’s outlook on life.
While a student at Yale Law School, Vance went to a talk by venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who was Facebook’s first outside investor and co-founded PayPal.
According to Vance, Thiel argued that elite professionals got themselves trapped into climbing rungs on the socioeconomic ladder at the expense of happiness.
Vance realized that he was “obsessed with achievement” for itself — “not as an end to something meaningful, but to win a social competition.” He also concluded that he “had prioritized striving over character.”
Thiel introduced Vance to the thought of René Girard (1923-2015), a French historian and philosopher whose writings, among other things, attracted Vance through the way he described Christianity as transcending the scapegoat myth of various cultures because Christ “has not wronged the civilization; the civilization has wronged him.”
Thiel, now 56, who identifies as a Christian and a conservative, is civilly married to a man. Vance worked for Thiel in venture capital, and Thiel was Vance’s major contributor in Vance’s successful run for U.S. Senate in Ohio in 2022.
9. Vance’s family ties kept him from becoming a Catholic for a long time.
Vance connected with Catholic doctrine several years after his grandmother died in 2005. It made sense to him.
“Yet I couldn’t shake the feeling that if I converted I would no longer be my grandmother’s grandson,” Vance wrote in The Lamp.
That left him in a sort of limbo.
“So for many years I occupied the uncomfortable territory between curiosity about Catholicism and mistrust,” he wrote.
10. Vance credits his Hindu wife with helping him convert to Catholicism.
Vance acknowledges having problems with anger stemming from his chaotic childhood and the destructive behavior of people in his family, especially his mother, who abused prescription drugs and went through a string of boyfriends and husbands.
That anger affected his relationship with Usha, his girlfriend in law school, but she helped him work through it to try to become the kind of husband and father he wanted to be. They married in 2014.
“The sad fact is that I couldn’t do it without Usha. Even at my best, I’m a delayed explosion — I can be defused, but only with skill and precision,” Vance wrote in “Hillbilly Elegy.”
Usha is the daughter of immigrants from India and a Hindu. Vance felt hesitant about joining the Catholic Church because he wasn’t a Catholic when they got married.
“But from the beginning, she supported my decision, so I can’t blame the delay on her,” Vance wrote in his conversion essay.
Vance has said the Church’s clergy sex-abuse scandal delayed his conversion by a few months.
11. Dominican priests helped draw Vance to Catholicism.
What Vance calls “a few informal conversations with a couple of Dominican friars” led to a period of serious study of Catholicism.
The process was gradual, with no a-ha moments.
But it included what he calls “some weird coincidences.”
During a late-night conversation at a hotel bar with an unnamed conservative Catholic writer, Vance says, he challenged the man for criticizing Pope Francis.
“While he admitted that some Catholics went too far, he defended his more measured approach,” Vance wrote in his conversion essay, “when suddenly a wine glass seemed to leap from a stable place behind the bar and crashed on the floor in front of us.”
That ended the conversation.
Another: While on a train from New York to Washington, D.C., Vance listened to a recording of an Orthodox choir singing a Psalm during Pope Francis’ visit to the country of Georgia in 2016.
When he got to Washington, he asked a Dominican friar to coffee.
“He invited me to visit his community, where I heard the friars chanting, apparently, the same psalm,” Vance wrote.
Vance was baptized in August 2019 by a Dominican priest, Father Henry Stephan, at St. Gertrude Priory, which is attached to a Dominican parish in Cincinnati, where Vance now lives.
Despite his Dominican connections, his confirmation saint is Augustine.
“I was pretty moved by the ‘Confessions,’” he told Rod Dreher. “I’ve probably read it in bits and pieces twice over the past 15 or so years. There’s a chapter from ‘The City of God’ that’s incredibly relevant now that I’m thinking about policy. There’s just a way that Augustine is an incredibly powerful advocate for the things that the Church believes. And one of the subtexts about my return to Christianity is that I had come from a world that wasn’t super-intellectual about the Christian faith. I spend a lot of my time these days among a lot of intellectual people who aren’t Christian. Augustine gave me a way to understand Christian faith in a strongly intellectual way. I also went through an angry atheist phase. As someone who spent a lot of his life buying into the lie that you had to be stupid to be a Christian, Augustine really demonstrated in a moving way that that’s not true.”
12. Vance credits practicing Catholicism with making him a better person.
Vance says practicing his Catholic faith has helped him increase his patience, curb his temper, forgive more easily, and choose his family over his career.
After he became a Catholic, Vance wrote in his conversion essay: “I realized that there was a part of me — the best part — that took its cues from Catholicism.”
13. Vance hasn’t yet explained how his current position on abortion squares with his Catholic faith.
Vance began public life as thoroughly pro-life.
In September 2021, several months after he began running for U.S. Senate in Ohio, Vance said he supported Texas’ law banning abortion.
“I think in Texas they’re trying to make it easier for unborn babies to be born,” Vance said during an interview with Spectrum News 1.
Asked about abortion in the cases of rape and incest, Vance said the question is “whether a child should be allowed to live.”
“Look, I think two wrongs don’t make a right. At the end of the day, we’re talking about an unborn baby,” Vance said (at 11:11 of the interview). “What kind of society do we want to have? A society that looks at unborn babies as inconveniences to be discarded?”
His tone shifted during a debate in October 2022 when he said he supported “reasonable exceptions,” including allowing a pregnant 10-year-old girl to have an abortion.
During a second debate that month, he said he supported a proposal in Congress at the time that would have banned abortion nationwide after 15 weeks.
More recently, Vance has aligned his public positions on abortion with those of his running mate, former president Donald Trump, who has said he wouldn’t sign a federal limitation on abortion and that he wouldn’t ban abortion pills.
On abortion pills, Vance told an interviewer on NBC on July 7 that he supports a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that, according to him, said that “the American people should have access to that medication.” Pressed about mifepristone, one of the two abortion chemicals, he said he supports access to it.
Vance has not at this writing publicly explained how he integrates his Catholic faith with his current position on abortion.
But he seemed to contemplate this sort of situation in an interview with Dreher in August 2019, shortly after his conversion and three years before he was elected to public office.
He noted that politics “is in part a popularity contest,” and he pointed out a tension between getting votes and living a life of faith.
“When you’re trying to do things that make you liked by as many people as possible, you’re not likely to do things that are consistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church,” Vance said then. “I’m a Christian, and a conservative, and a Republican, so I have definite views about what that means. But you have to be humble and realize that politics are essentially a temporal game.”
This story was first published by the National Catholic Register, CNA’s sister news partner, and has been adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
I am disappointed in Vance’s lack of nuance in his position on mifepristone (more specifically on the Supreme Court decision on the drug).
As I understand it, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case because the presenters did not have standing, i.e. they did not have the necessary qualifications to present the case. That’s not the same as approving mifepristone.
If I, as a non-lawyer, can grasp the difference, it surprises me that Vance can’t (or chooses not to).
Number 13 in the article above chronicles Vance’s journey from pro-life to pro-abortion, a journey which coincides with shifting public sentiment. Sadly, it looks like the path of a man lacking in principle or character.
Lucy, Mr Vance is not pro feticide. He’s simply acknowledging the Post Roe reality we have now after Dobbs. Each state has the right to be free of legally enshrined feticide if they so choose. That’s what my state did.
No candidate can win with a federal ban platform. Not in 2024. They’d only win here in the comment boxes.
Well, at least #4 is good for a laugh.
How many Protestants still buy this guff?
There’s still a few Cleo, but fewer and fewer these days.
“Number 13 in the article above chronicles Vance’s journey from pro-life to pro-abortion, a journey which coincides with shifting public sentiment. Sadly, it looks like the path of a man lacking in principle or character.”
Have you read Hillbilly Elegy? Read it and then make comments about his lack of principle or character.
And keep in mind that Pres. Biden is a Catholic who has been allowed by most priests to continue to receive Holy Communion in spite of his pro-abortion stance. And keep in mind that J.D. Vance is a fairly new convert to Catholicism, and has a lot to learn yet, but compared to the radical pro-abortion views of almost all Democrats, J.D. Vance’s views are much closer to the Catholic ideal. Finally, remember that at this point, although the current Republican Party Platform expresses a “softer” viewpoint on legal abortion than the previous pro-life stance, it’s still infinitely more pro-life by a hundred miles than the demonic Democratic Party Platform! The worst thing that could happen would be for Christians (Catholic, Protestant, or other) to throw their votes away by voting for a candidate who holds a strict pro-life stand but doesn’t have a chance with a hole in it of winning. The second worst thing would be for Christians to choose to stay home believing that their “silent protest” will actually accomplish anything good! This is the kind of foolishness that will give the election to the rabidly pro-abortion Democrats and plunge our nation into a blood-bath of infant deaths by abortion.
This is the guy who compared Trump to be the American Hitler and unfit to be POTUS. His memoir Hillbilly Elegy paints a very self-centered man who looks down on almost everybody, including Trump then. This guy views himself as the center of the universe. In his quest for naked power, he conveniently disregards his conservative moral principles to be a sychopant for an openly gay tech billionaire then and now for the person he once described as like the Nazi dictator. Just take a look at his conceited eyes. In him I don’t see a love for country but only for himself. He’s not Catholic for me.
“Just take a look at his conceited eyes.”
Well, that seals the deal. Sold! (Ahem.)
I avoided reading Hillbilly Elegy for some time because it seemed over-promoted but it was much better than I expected.
I’ve spent most of my life around the same sort of folks Mr. Vance grew up with. I’m missing how writing about that makes one self centered or conceited.
Sharing about childhood struggles and overcoming those without rejecting your family seems more an exercise in humility to me.
Considering the rough childhood Vance had, with an addict mother and raised in part by his grandmother, its sort of amazing he believes in God AT ALL!!! I cant stand the people who attack him for not being more Catholic than the Pope. This is all old ground. Those of you who would refuse to vote for the Republicans because they aren’t your version of perfect, ask yourself if you’d rather a DEM abortion radical ( which is most of them) elected to office. If he changed his perspective about Trump, so what? People DO change their minds about many things and Trump proved remarkably effective in his job, which his many critics did not expect. With both Vance and Trump, keep in mind we are electing a president and VP whose job it is to represent citizens with MANY points of view. We are not voting to elect someone a saint. And a strict catholic saint no less. You can cut off your nose to spite your face, or you can be realistic and vote for someone who will at least be sympathetic to your cause and if they have enough power, might DO something about it..
JD Vance is a changed man. But not in a good way. Can you even imagine stating that people who are childless should not get the same rights as people with Children. I wonder if Catholic priests or nuns are down with this. Vance is also against divorce….I guess he will be giving Trump a talking too over that. I have no doubt he is buddy buddy with Putin, and the VP position is just a stepping stone. Ask yourself how he will make America the kind of place you want to live in.
People who have children have a different sort of investment in the future and differing concerns.
War and conscription mean different things to people who have children and grandchildren. So does promoting child sterilization and mutilation. It becomes very personal to parents.
JD Vance wrote the forward to the book written by Heritage Foundation Director Kevin Roberts who has strong connections with Opus Dei. The release of the book was delayed recently.
That JD Vance wrote the forward does somewhat weaken the position of those who argue that there is minimal connection between the Trump Republican agenda and the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025.
One can be left to wonder about all of this for a suite if concerning potentialities, for one because Opus Dai is rather opaque in its involvement in the public sphere.
There seems to be a strong undercurrent of undermining the established norms underpinning effective governing via established protocols of the rule of law, due process and especially the separation of powers. Add to this the constitutions position regarding the separation if church and state and the reality that what is very much in the process of manoeuvring is rarely the subject of honest open discourse on the pages if this website. It is my assumotion that many who frequent these discussions are members if Opus Dai and I would welcome some clear and open discussion on what i have come to be somewhat alarmed at. After all we are people of the light
1 John 1:5-7 NIV
5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 6 If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.