Biden unveils plan to term limit Supreme Court justices, citing recent ‘extreme’ decisions

 

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House on July 25, 2024, in Washington, D.C. / Credit: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jul 29, 2024 / 14:57 pm (CNA).

President Joe Biden on Monday unveiled a proposal to reform the United States Supreme Court by adding term limits and an ethics code, saying he was motivated in part by the overturning of Roe v. Wade and other recent rulings.

In a July 29 op-ed for the Washington Post attributed to Biden, the president said “term limits would help ensure that the court’s membership changes with some regularity.” The plan would give justices one 18-year term. The president would appoint one justice every two years, which would ensure that the Supreme Court continues to have nine justices.

“The United States is the only major constitutional democracy that gives lifetime seats to its high court,” Biden continued. “Term limits would help ensure that the court’s membership changes with some regularity. That would make timing for court nominations more predictable and less arbitrary. It would reduce the chance that any single presidency radically alters the makeup of the court for generations to come.”

One motivation for these proposals cited by the president was the “dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedent  — including Roe v. Wade.” In the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe in a 6-3 ruling. Both states and the federal government can now restrict abortion, according to the new legal standard.

In the op-ed, the president also called for an “enforceable ethics code,” which would require Supreme Court justices to disclose gifts, refrain from political activity, and recuse themselves from cases if the justice or the justice’s spouse has a conflict of interest.

The president alleged in his op-ed that “scandals involving several justices have caused the public to question the court’s fairness and independence.” He added that undisclosed gifts and conflicts of interest “raise legitimate questions about the court’s impartiality.”

“Every other federal judge is bound by an enforceable code of conduct, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to be exempt,” Biden said.

Numerous Democratic lawmakers started calling for Supreme Court reforms after former President Donald Trump nominated Justice Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg upon the latter’s death. This altered the makeup of the court, which now has six justices appointed by Republicans and only three appointed by Democrats.

Biden did not indicate how the code would be enforced in his op-ed and did not say whether he intended to enact these changes legislatively or through constitutional amendments.

John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told CNA that he believes Biden would need constitutional amendments to enact either of these reforms but acknowledged that some respected constitutional scholars believe they could be enacted legislatively.

Malcolm, who testified to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States about such reforms, told CNA that “anything that is designed to curb [the Supreme Court’s] authority impinges on the separation of powers.”

Congress has established codes of conduct for lower courts, but Malcolm noted that “all other lower courts are created by Congress, so Congress has the authority to impose all kinds of restrictions.” Alternatively, he said the powers granted to the Supreme Court are established in the Constitution and that Congress has no more authority to enact a code of conduct on the Supreme Court “than the Supreme Court has to impose a code of conduct on Congress.”

However, even if the president tried to enact the reforms legislatively, Malcolm said there is no chance it could pass because it’s “such a patently political move that I can’t imagine any Republican supporting it.” He also noted that Biden did not propose these reforms as a senator, vice president, or even at the beginning of his presidency but only now that there is strong support from his Democratic base.

“Never at any time has he called for any Supreme Court reforms,” Malcom said. “Now all of a sudden, when there [is] … now 99 days until an election … now is when he calls for reforms. This is a blatant attempt to try to turn the Supreme Court into an election issue.”

In the Washington Post op-ed, the president also called for a constitutional amendment that would declare that former presidents do not have any immunity for crimes committed while in office. He criticized a recent Supreme Court ruling that found that presidents have some immunity from criminal prosecutions for official acts taken as commander in chief.

“I share our founders’ belief that the president’s power is limited, not absolute,” Biden said. “We are a nation of laws — not of kings or dictators.”

Republicans hold a narrow majority in the House of Representatives. Democrats hold a narrow majority in the Senate but not a large enough majority to overcome the 60-vote threshold needed to end debate on most bills.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12596 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

3 Comments

  1. Not satisfied with trying to install a one party system where even the votes of their own primary voters do not count, they now wish to RIG the Supreme Court to guarantee the results they want. Funny, they had no issue with the court when RBG was falling asleep during hearings.And shrugged when the court justices were attacked at their homes by pro-leftist crowds. I dont recall that anyone was ever arrested for those “demonstrations”, even though they are illegal. Yet this is the crowd who are claiming they need to be elected in order to “save democracy”??? Really? Anyone voting to approve these people and their sick policies are either selling their votes outright or are not the sharpest tools in the shed. Maybe both. As for Biden himself he is just typical of the self aggrandizing democrat politician, who is interested only in himself, not the welfare of the country. Still grasping for power as his own party kicks him down the stairs and out the door.

  2. I was happily reading this article until the words “Joe Biden” and “ethics code” appeared together in the same sentence.

    Alas, I could go no further.

  3. I remember back in high school when we were required to pass the U.S. Constitution test in order to graduate. The good reasons for a lifetime appointment for Supreme Court justices made sense to me (a teenager of the 1970s!) back then, and they still do now that I am in my late 60s. Of course, I’m not sure that the U.S. Constitution is being taught the same way by the ultra-liberal teachers in the ultra-liberal public schools. Propaganda is dangerous thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*