The Dispatch: More from CWR...

End-of-life care should never hasten death

Disregard for life at all stages is something that American Life League fights against on a daily basis, especially during Respect Life Month.

(Image: us.folia.com)

“I want to change how the world sees my patients.”

These words were spoken by a neurologist on a new show called Brilliant Minds, based loosely on the life of the late Oliver Sacks. Dr. Wolf, the fictional doctor, spoke these words after he had taken some unconventional methods to awaken the memories of an Alzheimer’s patient. Knowing that this man was at the end of his life, he argued that he wanted to bring him joy when he could because he would not just allow the man to “rot” in bed.

As the show implies, too often in our country, those who are sick or who have limited abilities are considered useless and therefore disposable. But our faith teaches the truth that all human beings—regardless of their age or ability—are valuable because we all have inherent dignity and are created in the image and likeness of God.

“I want to change how the world sees my patients” is a philosophy all doctors and medical professionals should live by, regardless of whether the patient is a preborn baby or someone who is sick or elderly. Imagine a world where all people are treated with the dignity they deserve, where all human beings are valued, and where no one’s life is prematurely taken.

Sadly, this is not the world we currently live in. One look at recent headlines illustrates a deep disdain for the people that society does not deem valuable. We see news of suicide pods, more assisted suicide laws, and people crying out for abortion “rights.” All of these things have one thing in common—a disregard for the sanctity of life.

This disregard for life at all stages is something that American Life League fights against on a daily basis, especially during Respect Life Month. And one of our primary concerns is how the sick and elderly are treated in hospitals when facing a life-threatening emergency or the end of life.

It’s no secret that medical personnel within hospitals sometimes forego critical care when it comes to treating the sick and elderly. Not only do they encourage family members to just “let go” of their loved ones, but they actively advocate for the harvesting of vital organs, something that, unless it’s a kidney or the lobe of a liver, can only be done on a body that’s still alive and that then results in a dead person. As the Healthcare Advocacy and Leadership Organization states, “All vital organs—heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas, and intestines—must be healthy for transplantation. Only living persons have healthy organs.”

Through our work and our educational tools, ALL seeks to advocate for and protect you and your loved ones during these vulnerable times. We want you to understand that end-of-life care does not mean hasting death. End-of-life care requires protection, attention to treatment, and a discerning eye when reading through the legalese of paperwork.

One of our latest tools to help facilitate this respect for life is the Pro-Life Healthcare Directive and Durable Power of Attorney. This new healthcare directive is an update to the Loving Will document we created over 30 years ago to combat the living wills frequently promoted by the culture of death. Understanding that the changes in our culture today pose even greater threats to the sick or those nearing the end of their lives, we recently updated it with the help of lawyers and euthanasia experts and changed the name to Pro-Life Healthcare Directive and Durable Power of Attorney.

Our free downloadable document includes a wealth of information to help you make an informed decision about your health and treatment options before you become sick or unable to provide input into your care. It “instructs your family, friends, and healthcare providers to do nothing intentionally—by act or omission—to cause your death” and “ensures life-affirming medical treatment and care, including food, water, and oxygen.”

This vital tool is something every Christian family should have.

Helping you and your loved ones prepare for catastrophic illness or death is just one of the ways ALL works to change how the world sees the humanity of all people, for it is only when patients are seen as human beings rather than as burdens or commodities that we will truly create a culture of life.

Dr. Wolf said of his patient, “I choose to walk with him,” and so must we make that same decision. Walking with our loved ones at the end of life or when terminally ill means caring for them emotionally, physically, and spiritually. Walking with people at the end of life never means leading them toward an early death.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Susan Ciancio 64 Articles
Susan Ciancio is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame and has worked as a writer and editor for nearly 19 years; 13 of those years have been in the pro-life sector. Currently, she is the editor of American Life League’s Celebrate Life Magazine—the nation’s premier Catholic pro-life magazine. She is also the executive editor of ALL’s Culture of Life Studies Program—a pre-K-12 Catholic pro-life education organization.

11 Comments

  1. I am against euthanasia, but I believe it misrepresents the issue to portray it as supply driven rather than demand driven. Too many people are seeing loved ones die in terrible conditions and have decided they don’t want that for themselves, and the euthanasia suppliers are meeting that demand. We need to ensure that no one dies in extreme pain (something several doctors have assured me need not be the case) or in a dim room in a soiled diaper with five strangers nearby in their own discomfort.

    • You may wish to consider an Advanced Medical Directive to limit your exposure to predatory medical practices in favor of palliative care. The ADA should include a definition of death the natural stopping of a beating heart, Many extraordinary procedures artificially maintain a beating heart to preserve organs for transfer and more nefariously to prescribe proceedures to milk the insurance companies and families. The ADA can direct the family to sign a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Order and palliative care.

  2. Thank you so much for sharing this.
    If you haven’t cared for someone with a terminal illness it might be more difficult to understand the real neglect of care that can occur & the pressures on vulnerable family members to hasten death. Sadly, hospice workers can sometimes be the worst offenders.
    At the end of a life you can encounter the very best & worst in people.

  3. Prolonging life when death is inevitable is also a grave sin that nobody ever talks about. Organ donation should not exist. Cancer treatments should not exist. If a disease cannot be cured, there is no reason to waste time and loads of money treating it. People should expire naturally, when it is their time. Not held hostage in a half-life riddled with pain and using up all of their family’s financial resources and bankrupting them just to reach the same conclusion of death as if the issue were never treated in the first place. By seeking to extend the life of the terminally ill, you are playing God and further lining the pockets of greedy doctors. You are arrogantly spitting in the face of God and saying “no I won’t go home to heaven, I know more than you and I am going to stay here and party more.” It’s not very pro-life at all.

    • “Cancer treatments should not exist.”

      Huh? I’ll have to share that with my 19-year-old son, who was diagnosed with a cancerous tumor in his chest in July and given no chance of surviving long without chemotherapy. Last week, after 80 days of treatment, the tumor was gone (the doctors had given him a 50/50 chance with treatment), an answer to prayer. He still has a long way to go to regain full health, of course, but without treatment, he probably would be dead by now. Would that have been better for him? For his mother and me? For society?

    • Having survived a rare, aggressive form of cancer that almost took my life, I disagree with your assumptions. There is a time and a way to fight for your life, and there is a time and a way to wrap up your life and try to die well.

  4. Mr. Texas – Be assured there are plenty of us grateful cancer survivors more than willing to give your post the ridicule it so richly deserves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*